SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Maliye ve Finans Yazıları / 2020 / Sayı: 114

The Relationships Among Corporate Governance Principles and Firm Performance

Tuğba KARABULUT
Mustafa Emre CİVELEK
Pınar BAŞAR
Sabri ÖZ
Recep Ali KÜÇÜKÇOLAK
Pages
401–418
Publication Date
2020-10-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Analyses results have been concluded that accountability has a positive effect on the firm performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to analyse the effects of transparency and responsibility on accountability and fairness respectively and the effects of accountability and fairness on the firm performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The principles of corporate governance which are fairness, transparency, responsibility and accountability have been studied.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Analyses results have been concluded that accountability has a positive effect on the firm performance.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:corporate · governance

Özet

This study aims to analyse the effects of transparency and responsibility on accountability and fairness respectively and the effects of accountability and fairness on the firm performance. The principles of corporate governance which are fairness, transparency, responsibility and accountability have been studied. The data were collected randomly from 116 companies in Istanbul in 2019 based on field study including five-point Likert scales questionnaire. Structural equation modelling (SEM) method was used to conduct the analyses. The hypotheses have been put forward to clarify the relationships among corporate governance principles and company performance in conceptual research model. Analyses results have been concluded that accountability has a positive effect on the firm performance. Additionally, responsibility has a positive effect on fairness. Conversely, the hypotheses suggested positive relations between transparency and accountability and between fairness and firm performance were not supported. Consequently, analyses results have been discussed in managerial implications perspective.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARABULUT, T., CİVELEK, M. E., BAŞAR, P., ÖZ, S., KÜÇÜKÇOLAK, R. A. (2020). The Relationships Among Corporate Governance Principles and Firm Performance. Maliye ve Finans Yazıları, Sayı: 114, 401–418. https://ajindex.com/articles/228817

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. REFERENCES Abrahman, N. A., Hassan, S., Said, J., & Ramli, A. (2016). Improving Employees Accountability and Firm Performance Through Management Accounting Practices. Procedia Economics and Finance(35), 92-98.
  2. Akgün, A. e., Ince, H., Imamoğlu, S., Keskin, H., & Kocoğlu, I. (2014). The mediator role of learning capability and business innovativeness between total quality management and financial performance. International Journal of Production Research, 52(3), 888-901.
  3. Anderson, J., & Gerbing, D. (1988). Structural Equation Modelling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin. Ayboğa, H. (2020). Risk Yönetiminin Kurumsal Yönetimde Şeffaflık Ve Hesap Verebilirlik İlkeleri. P. Başar, & D. Celayir içinde, Kurumsal Yönetim ve Risk Yönetimi (s. 25-49). Ankara:
  4. Nobel. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1990). Assessing Method Variance in Multitrait-Multimethod Matrices: The Case of Self-reported Affect and Perceptions at Work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(1), 547-560.
  5. Baloğlu, G. (2020). Kurumsal Risk Yönetimi. P. Başar, & D. Celayir içinde, Kurumsal Yönetim ve Risk Yönetimi (s. 50-80). Ankara:
  6. Nobel. Başar, P., & Celayir, D. (2020). Risk Yönetiminin Kurumsal Yönetimdeki Rolü ve Sistemin Güvencesi: İç Denetim. P. Başar, & D. Celayir içinde, Kurumsal Yönetim ve Risk Yönetimi (s. 1-25). Ankara:
  7. Nobel. Boğan, E., Türkay, O., & Dedeoğlu, B. B. (2018). Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility and Job Satisfaction: The Mediator Role of Organizational Identification. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 10(2), 51-68.
  8. Bommaraju, R., Ahearne, M., Krause, R., & Tirunillai, S. (2019). Does a Customer on the Board of Directors Affect Business-to-Business Firm Performance? Journal of Marketing, 83(1), 8-23.
  9. Burak, E. (2017). Effects of Corporate Governance Principles and Human Resources Practises on Business Performance, Basılmamış Doktora Tezi. Istanbul: Gebze Technique University. Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. CGRDC, P. C. (2012). Privatization Corporate Governance and Business Environment: A Comperative Study of Private Sector Development In Iran, Pakistan and Turkey. 1-72.
  10. Civelek, M. (2018). Essentials of Structural Equation Modeling. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Lincoln-Zea Books. Cummings, L. (2000). The Financial Performance of Ethical Investment Trusts: An Australian Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 79-92.
  11. Davies, A. (2011). The