Journals / Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

MEASURING THE EFFICIENCY OF ENTREPRENEURIAL AND INNOVATIVE UNIVERSITIES

GİRİŞİMCİ VE YENİLİKÇİ ÜNİVERSİTELERİN ETKİNLİKLERİNİN ÖLÇÜLMESİ

Pages
323–338
Publication Date
2021-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, it has been determined that entrepreneurial and innovative universities in Turkey should use their available resources more efficiently and increase output

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Contributions of universities, especially those entrepreneurial and innovative, to the economy matter in the growth and development of countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the findings of the study, it was seen that 18 % of the universities were efficient in the constant return to scale analysis in which their efficiency in terms of Entrepreneurship and Innovation was evaluated, and 26% of them were efficient in the variable return to scale analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, it has been determined that entrepreneurial and innovative universities in Turkey should use their available resources more efficiently and increase output
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Girişimcilik · Yenilikçilik · Etkinlik

Abstract

Contributions of universities, especially those entrepreneurial and innovative, to the economy matter in the growth and development of countries. In the study, it is aimed to analyse efficiencies of entrepreneurial and innovative universities in Turkey in both entrepreneurial and academic terms. To achieve this goal, constant return to scale (CRS) and variable return to scale (VRS) methods of Data Envelopment Analysis was used by creating two different models. In addition, the Super-Efficiency scores of efficient universities were determined. In the findings of the study, it was seen that 18 % of the universities were efficient in the constant return to scale analysis in which their efficiency in terms of Entrepreneurship and Innovation was evaluated, and 26% of them were efficient in the variable return to scale analysis. In the constant return to scale analysis, in which their efficiency was evaluated in terms of scientific study, it was determined that 24% of the universities were efficient, and 40% were efficient in variable return to scale analysis. In conclusion, it has been determined that entrepreneurial and innovative universities in Turkey should use their available resources more efficiently and increase output

Özet

Ülkelerin büyümesinde ve gelişmesinde üniversitelerin, özellikle girişimci ve yenilikçi üniversitelerin ekonomiye katkıları önem taşımaktadır. Çalışmada Türkiye`deki girişimci ve yenilikçi üniversitelerin hem girişimsel ve hem de akademik açıdan etkinliklerinin analiz edilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaca ulaşmak için iki farklı model oluşturularak Veri Zarflama Analizi kullanılmıştır. Ayrıca, etkin üniversitelerin Süper Etkinlik skorları belirlenmiştir. Çalışma bulgularında, Girişimcilik ve Yenilikçilik yönünden etkinliklerinin değerlendirildiği ölçeğe göre sabit getirili analizde üniversitelerin %18`inin, ölçeğe göre değişken getirili analizde ise %26`sının etkin olduğu görülmüştür. Bilimsel Çalışma yönünden etkinliklerinin değerlendirildiği ölçeğe göre sabit getirili analizde üniversitelerin %24`ünün, ölçeğe göre değişken getirili analizde ise %40`ının etkin olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Çalışma sonucunda Türkiye`deki girişimci ve yenilikçi üniversitelerin mevcut kaynaklarını daha etkin kullanmaları ve çıktıları artırmaları gerektiği tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SELAMZADE, F., ÖZDEMİR, Y. (2021). MEASURING THE EFFICIENCY OF ENTREPRENEURIAL AND INNOVATIVE UNIVERSITIES. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 323–338. https://ajindex.com/articles/228120

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Bahçeci, A., Atıcı, K.B. ve Ulucan, A. (2020). Kamu-üniversite-sanayi işbirliği (KÜSİ) kapsamında bölgesel etkinlik ve potansiyel değerlendirmesi”. Maliye Dergisi, 178:289-312
  2. Bai, X. J., Li, Z. Y. and Zeng, J. (2020). Performance evaluation of China's innovation during the industry-university-research collaboration process—an analysis basis on the dynamic network slacks-based measurement model, Technology in Society, 62(101310): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101310.
  3. Banker, R. D., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9): 1078-1092.
  4. Bercovitz, J. ve Feldman, M. (2008). Academic entrepreneurs: organizational change at the individual level, Organization Science, 19(1): 69-89.
  5. Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., Esposito, E. and Shashi, (2019, a). Exploration and exploitation in the development of more entrepreneurial universities: A twisting learning path model of ambidexterity, Technological Forecasting ve Social Change, 141: 172-194,
  6. Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., Esposito, E. and Shashi, (2019, b). The mediating role of knowledge exploration and exploitation for the development of an entrepreneurial university, Management Decision, 57(12): 3301-3320. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-11-2018-1240,
  7. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. and Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operation Research, 2: 429-444.
  8. Clark, B.R.(1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities:organisational pathways of transformation, Pergamo Press. http://www.oktemvardar.com/articles/BRC%20entrepreneurial.pdf
  9. Coelli, T. J. et al., (1998). An introduction to efficiency ve productivity analysis, Second Ed. Springer. Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M. and Tone, K. (2010).
  10. Data envelopment analysis, Boston:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  11. Deluyi, A.H., Rashed, F., Sofian, S., and Daud, K. (2014). Measurement efficiency of entrepreneurial universities by using mathematical programming (DEA) approach”, Jurnal Teknologi 68(4): 33–36
  12. Er, F ve Yıldız, E. (2018). Türkiye girişimci ve yenilikçi üniversite endeksi 2016 ve 2017 sonuçlarının ORESTE ve faktör analizi ile incelenmesi, Alphanumeric Journal, 5(2): 293-310.
  13. Koyuncuoğlu, Ö. ve Tekin, M. (2019). Türkiye’de girişimci ve yenilikçi üniversitelerin gömülü teoriye göre değerlendirmesi ve bir model önerisi, Selçuk Ün. Sos. Bil. Ens. Der. (41): 16-31.
  14. Kutlar, A. ve Babacan, A. (2008). Türkiye’deki k