Journals / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2004 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

Tension-free vaginal tape versus burch colposuspension for primary treatment of female stress urinary incontinence

Pages
157–160
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although de novo detrusor instability was similar for the TVT and Burch procedure (17% vs 20% respectively), urinary retention was more common after the TVT procedure (23.5% vs 0%). we conclude that TVT should be considered first over other surgical procedures for SUI, because of its high cure rate, taken together with a shorter operation time and hospital stay and decreased analgesic requirement

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We aimed to evaluate the short-term outcomes of the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure for female urinary incontinence, comparing with Burch colposuspension.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A retrospective analysis was performed on 37 patients who underwent TVT (n=17) or Burch colposuspension (n=20) for stress urinary incontinence.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although de novo detrusor instability was similar for the TVT and Burch procedure (17% vs 20% respectively), urinary retention was more common after the TVT procedure (23.5% vs 0%). we conclude that TVT should be considered first over other surgical procedures for SUI, because of its high cure rate, taken together with a shorter operation time and hospital stay and decreased analgesic requirement
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İdrar kaçırma · stres · Geriyedönük çalışma

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the short-term outcomes of the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure for female urinary incontinence, comparing with Burch colposuspension. A retrospective analysis was performed on 37 patients who underwent TVT (n=17) or Burch colposuspension (n=20) for stress urinary incontinence. The diagnosis of incontinence was based on specific questionnaires and physical examinations including cough stress test, Q-tip test, but without preoperative urodynamic verification. The primary cure rate was estimated to be 70 % for the Burch procedure and 76% for the TVT. The operation time, hospital stay and post operative analgesic need for TVT was significantly less compared to Burch colposuspension. Although de novo detrusor instability was similar for the TVT and Burch procedure (17% vs 20% respectively), urinary retention was more common after the TVT procedure (23.5% vs 0%). we conclude that TVT should be considered first over other surgical procedures for SUI, because of its high cure rate, taken together with a shorter operation time and hospital stay and decreased analgesic requirement

🔖

Cite This Article

KAFALI, H., HARMA, M., HARMA, M., VERİT, A., YENİ, E. (2004). Tension-free vaginal tape versus burch colposuspension for primary treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 157–160. https://ajindex.com/articles/227742

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Brocklehurst JC.Urinary incontinence in the community-analysis of a MORI poll. Br Med J 1993;306:832-4. 2.Keane DP, Eckford SD, Shepherd AM, et al. Referral patterns and diagnoses in women attending a urodynamic unit. Br Med J 1992; 305:808. 3.Kılıçarslan H, Güvenal T, Ayan S, Gökçe G, Çetin A, Gültekin EY. Comparison of outcomes of three different surgical techniques performed for stress urinary incontinence. Int J Urol. 2003; 10:126-30. 4.Gordon D, Luxman D, Sarig Y, Groutz A. Pelvic floor exercise and biofeedback in women with urinary stress incontinence. Harefuah 1999; 136:593-6. 5.Bidmead J, Cardoza L. Retropubic urethropexy (Burch colposuspension). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct2001; 12:262-5. 6.Leach GE, Dmochowski RR, Appel RA, et al. Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence. The American Urological Association. J. Urol. 1997; 158:875-80. 7.McGuire EJ, Lytton B, Kohorn El, Pepe V. The value of urodynamic testing in stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 1980; 124:256-8. 8.Ulmsten U, Johnson P, Rezapour M. A three-year follow-up of tension free vaginal tape for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999; 106:345-50. 9.Ulmsten U, Falconer C, Johnsson P, et al. A multicenter study of tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J.1998; 9:210-3. 10.Moran P, Ward K, Johnson D, et al. Tension free vaginal tape for primary GSI: a two centre follow-up study. Br J Int 2000; 86:39-42. 11. Enzelsberger H, Helmer H, Schatten C. Comparison of Burch and Iyodura sling procedures for repair of unsuccessful incontinence surgery. Obstet. Gynecol. 1996; 88:251-6. 12.Nilsson CG, Kuuva N. The tension-free vaginal tape procedure is successful in the majority of women with indications for surgical treatment of urinary stress incontinence, Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2001; 108:414-9. 13.Beresford NM, Evans AA. Recent advances and contro¬versies in the surgical techniques for urinary stress in¬continence Reviews in Gynecological Practice, 2003; 3:137-41. 14. Laurikainen E, Kiilholma P. The tension-free vaginal tape procedure for female urinary incontinence without preoperative urodynamic evaluation. J Am Coll Surg 2003; 196:579-83.