Journals / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2004 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

Urinary incontinence: Prevalence and risk factors, association with anal incontinence and scope of incontinence in Turkish women

Pages
114–122
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

STUDY DESIGN: The prevalence of overall, stress, urge, mixed urinary incontinence and anal incontinence was assessed by a multichoice questionnaire form in 1021 patients who admitted to outpatient gynecology clinics of our hospital.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and risk factors of urinary and anal incontinence and to assess women's response and point of view to urinary incontinence.
📊
Key Findings & Data:STUDY DESIGN: The prevalence of overall, stress, urge, mixed urinary incontinence and anal incontinence was assessed by a multichoice questionnaire form in 1021 patients who admitted to outpatient gynecology clinics of our hospital.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Education of population is important in order to avoid complications of incontinence.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Türkiye · İdrar kaçırma · Yaygınlık

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and risk factors of urinary and anal incontinence and to assess women's response and point of view to urinary incontinence. STUDY DESIGN: The prevalence of overall, stress, urge, mixed urinary incontinence and anal incontinence was assessed by a multichoice questionnaire form in 1021 patients who admitted to outpatient gynecology clinics of our hospital. RESULTS: Of the 1021 patients, 162(15.9%) reported urinary incontinence, comprising 79(48.8%) with stress, 50(30.9%) with urge and 33(20.4%) with mixed urinary incontinence. There were significant differences regarding age, number of pregnancies and deliveries, route of delivery, duration of labor, infant birth weight, enuresis in childhood, enuresis nocturna, constipation, flatal and fecal incontinence between patients with and without urinary incontinence (p<0.05). In comparison of subgroups (stress, urge and mixed urinary incontinence) with patients without urinary incontinence, one by one, there were statistically significant differences concerning age, number of pregnancies and deliveries, route of delivery, and enuresis nocturna (p<0.05). Of the 1021 patients, 525(51.5%) reported flatal incontinence and 32(3.1%) reported fecal incontinence. The rates of flatal and fecal incontinence in patients with urinary incontinence were 65.4%(n=106) and 6.8%(n=11), respectively. Most of the women (66.1%) did not perceive urinary incontinence as a social or hygienic problem, however 84.6% of the patients with urinary incontinence did (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Ageing and obstetric events were the most prominent risk factors. According to our results, patients with urinary and anal incontinence could not yet seek for medical help. Education of population is important in order to avoid complications of incontinence.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜRBÜZ, A., KARATEKE, A., KABACA, C., HALİLOĞLU, B., ŞAHİNOĞLU, Z., BİLGİN, Z. (2004). Urinary incontinence: Prevalence and risk factors, association with anal incontinence and scope of incontinence in Turkish women. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 114–122. https://ajindex.com/articles/227736

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Abrams P, Blaivas JG, Stanton SL, Anderson JT. The standartisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function. The International Continence Society Committee on Standartisation of Terminology. Scand J Urol Nephrol Supp 1988; 114:5-19
  2. Swithinbank LV, Abrams P. The impact of urinary incontinence on the quality of life of women. World J Urol 1999; 17:225-9
  3. Ekelund P, Grimby A, Milsom I. Urinary incontinence: Social and financial costs high. BMJ 1993; 306:1344
  4. Samuelsson E, Victor A, Svardsudd K. Determinants of urinary incontinence in a population of young and middle-aged women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000; 79:208-15
  5. Thom D. Variations in estimates of urinary incontinence prevalence in the community: effects of differences in definition, population characteristics, and study type. J Am Geriatr Soc 1998; 46:473-80
  6. Faltin DL, Sangalli MR, Curtin F, Morabia A, Weil A. Prevalence of anal incontinence and other anorectal symptoms in women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2001; 12:117-21
  7. Ryhammer AM, Bek KM, Laurberg A. Multiple vaginal deliveries increase the risk of permanent incontinence of flatus and urine in normal premenopausal women. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38:1206-9
  8. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN. Pudental nerve damage during labour: prospective study before and after childbirth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 101:22-8
  9. Khullar V, Damiano R, Toozs-Hobson P, Cardozo L. Prevalence of faecal incontinence among women with urinary incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 105:1211-3
  10. Gonzalez-Argente FX, Jain A, Nogueras JJ, Davila GW, Weiss EG, Wexner SD. Prevalence and severity of urinary incontinence and pelvic genital prolapse in females with anal incontinence or rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44:920-6
  11. Lose G, Fantl JA, Victor A, et al. Outcome measure for research in adult women with symptoms of lower urinary tract dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn 1998; 17:255-62
  12. Chiverton PA, Wells TJ, Brink CA, Mayer R. Psychological factors associated with urinary incontinence. Clin Nurse Spec 1996; 10:229-33
  13. Hording U, Pedersen KH, Sidenius K, Hedegaard L. Urinary incontinence in 45-year old women. An epidemiological survey. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1986; 20:183-6
  14. Lagro-Janssen T, Smits A, van Weel C. Urinary incontinence in women and the effects on their lives. Scand J Prim Health Care 1992; 10:211-6
  15. Harrison GL, Memel DS. Urinary incontinence in women: its prevalence and its management in health p