Journals / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2009 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3

İkinci trimestir konjenital anomali taramasında umbilikal kord çapı kalınlığının tanısal değeri

The diagnostic value of the umbilical cord diameter thickness in second trimester congenital anomaly screening

Pages
133–137
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION: Umbilical cord diameter was not found to be a valuable sonographic finding in the congenital anomaly screening.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: Diagnostic value of the umbilical cord thickness second trimester congenital anomaly screening.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients were examined by dividing them into 3 groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION: Umbilical cord diameter was not found to be a valuable sonographic finding in the congenital anomaly screening.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Diagnostic value of the umbilical cord thickness second trimester congenital anomaly screening. STUDY DESIGN: Eighty-three pregnant women in the study. Patients were examined by dividing them into 3 groups. The first group was comprised of 50 healthy individuals which exhibited no chromosomal or sonographic fetal anomaly. The second group consisted of 8 cases which displayed chromosomal anomaly by amniocentesis. The third group included 25 cases with fetal anomaly detected by USG. RESULTS: The first group mean cord diameter was 7.06±1.6 mm (4.50-11.80 mm). Second group was 8.32±2.2 mm (4.60-11.0 mm), third group was 7.24±1.5 mm (4.70-10.50). No significant difference was determined between the results (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Umbilical cord diameter was not found to be a valuable sonographic finding in the congenital anomaly screening.

Özet

AMAÇ: İkinci trimestirde konjenital anomali taramasında sonografik bir bulgu olarak umbilikal kord kalınlığının tanısal değerini araştırmayı amaçladık. GEREÇ ve YÖNTEM Çalışmaya 83 gebe dahil edildi Hastalar üç gruba ayrıldı. Birinci grup , kromozomal ya da ultrasonografik fetal anomali saptanmayan sağlıklı fetuslerden oluşan 50 olguluk kontrol grubu; ikinci grup, amniosentez sonucunda kromozomal anomali saptanan 8 olguluk grup ve üçüncü grup, ultrasonografik olarak saptanmış fetal anomaliye sahip 25 olgudan oluşan gruptu. BULGULAR: Birinci grubun kord çapları (4.5-11.80 mm) ortalama 7.06±1.6 mm olarak saptandı.İkinci grubun kord çapları (4.60-11.0 mm) ortalama 8.32 ± 2.2 mm ve üçüncü grubun kord çapları (4.70-10.50 mm) ortalama 7.24±1.5 mm olarak saptandı.Gruplar arasında anlamlı bir farklılık saptanmadı.( p>0.05). SONUÇ: İkinci trimestirde umbilikal kord çapı kalınlığı ölçümü konjenital anomali taramasında sonografik bulgu olarak değerli bulunmadı.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞENYUVA, İ., TANER, C. (2009). İkinci trimestir konjenital anomali taramasında umbilikal kord çapı kalınlığının tanısal değeri. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3, 133–137. https://ajindex.com/articles/227711

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Ghezzi F, Raio L, Di Naro E, Franchi M, Brühwiler H, D'Addario V, Schneider H First-trimester sonographic umbilical cord diameter and the growth of the human embryo Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Oct;18(4):348-51
  2. Predanic M, Perni SC, Chasen ST The umbilical cord thickness measured at 18-23 weeks of gestational age J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005 Feb;17(2):111-6
  3. Qin Y, Lau TK, Rogers MS. Second-trimester ultrasonographic assessment of the umbilical coiling index Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Nov;20(5):458-63 4. Weissman A, Jakobi P, Bronshtein M, Goldstein I. Sonographic measurements of the umbilical cord and vessels during normal pregnancies. J Ultrasound Med. 1994 Jan;13(1):11-4
  4. Strong TH Trisomy among fetuses with noncoiled umbilical blood vessels J Reprod Med. 1995 Nov;40(11):789-90
  5. Malpas P, Symonds EM. Observations on the structure of the human umbilical cord. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1966 Oct;123(4):746-50 7. Cullen TS.Embryology,anatomy,and diseases of the umbilicus,together with diseases of the urachus. Philadelphia. Sounders;1916
  6. Winckel FKLW.Lehrbuch der geburtshilfe, 2nd ed. Leipzig:Veit;1893
  7. Mills JL, Harley EE, Moessinger AC Standards for measuring umbilical cord length
  8. Lacro RV, Jones KL, Benirschke K. The umbilical cord twist: origin, direction, and relevance Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Oct;157(4 Pt 1):833-8
  9. Roach MR.1987.The Umbilical vessels.In Perinatol Medicine;.The basic science underlying clinical practice.Goodwin JW.Godden JO.Chance GW.Williams &Wilkins:Baltimore,MD134-142
  10. Raio L, Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Cereda E, Passi A. Sonographic morphology and hyaluronan content of umbilical cords of healthy and Down syndrome fetuses in early gestation. Early Hum Dev. 2004 Apr;77(1-2):1-12 13. Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Duerig P, Travaglini M, Buttarelli M, Raio L. Sonographic atypical vascular coiling of the umbilical cord Prenat Diagn. 2005 Jan;25(1):1-6
  11. Labarrere C, Sebastiani M, Siminovich M, Torassa E, Althabe OAbsence of Wharton’s's jelly around the umbilical arteries: an unusual cause of perinatal mortality Placenta. 1985 Nov-Dec;6(6):555-9
  12. Silver RK, Dooley SL, Tamura RK, Depp R Umbilical cord size and amniotic fluid volume in prolonged pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Sep;157(3):716-20 16. Ghezzi F, Raio L, Di Naro E, Franchi M, Balestreri D, D'Addario VNomogram of Wharton’s's jelly as depicted in the sonographic cross section of the umbilical cordUltrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Aug;18(2):121-5