SavedAdd your journal

Journals / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2004 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

Analyses of prenatally diagnosed fetal talipes cases

İbrahim Serdar SERİN
Mustafa BAŞBUĞ
Bülent ÖZÇELİK
MEHMET TAYYAR
Pages
4–6
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The management of cases must be determined whether the presence of additional structurel or chrosomal abnormalities and lethality.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: To analyse the prenatally diagnosed fetal talipes cases by ultrasonography in Diagnostic Unit of Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
📊
Key Findings & Data:STUDY DESIGN: All records of Erciyes University Prenatal Diagnosis Unit were reviewed between January, 2000 and January, 2002.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The management of cases must be determined whether the presence of additional structurel or chrosomal abnormalities and lethality.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Çarpık ayak · Gebelik · Doğum öncesi tanı

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the prenatally diagnosed fetal talipes cases by ultrasonography in Diagnostic Unit of Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. STUDY DESIGN: All records of Erciyes University Prenatal Diagnosis Unit were reviewed between January, 2000 and January, 2002. Fetal talipes with additional abnormalities and isolated cases were identified. Karyotype of fetuses and pregnancy outcomes were presented. RESULTS: There were 16 cases of prenatally diagnosed fetal talipes between January, 2000- January, 2002. These cases were diagnosed in gestational age from 16 through 35 weeks. Two isolated unilateral, 3 isolated bilateral, 7 bilateral with multiple abnormalities, 2 bilateral with skeletal dysplasia, 1 unilateral with sacrococcygeal teratoma, 1 unilateral with neural tube defect were identified by USG. One of 16 cases had chrosomal abnormality (trisomy 21). Lethal cases with multiple abnormalities were terminated after ultrasonographic diagnosis. Three isolated bilateral and 2 isolated unilateral talipes were corrected by surgery. CONCLUSION: The relationship between the shaft of tibia and plantar surface of the foot must be screened routinely in fetal USG. The management of cases must be determined whether the presence of additional structurel or chrosomal abnormalities and lethality.

🔖

Cite This Article

SERİN, İ. S., BAŞBUĞ, M., ÖZÇELİK, B., TAYYAR, M. (2004). Analyses of prenatally diagnosed fetal talipes cases. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 4–6. https://ajindex.com/articles/227588

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Smith DW. Recognizable patterns of human malformations: genetic, embryologic and clinical aspects. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1982:1-653
  2. Wynne-Davis R, Littlejohn A, Gormley J. Aetiology and inter-relationship of some common skeletal deformities. J Med Genet 1982; 19:321-8
  3. Drvaric DM, Kulvila TE, Roberts JM. Congenital clubfoot. Etiology, pathoanatomy, pathogenesis, and the changing spectrum of early management. Orthop Clin North Am 1989; 20:641-7
  4. Bronshtein M, Zimmer EZ. Transvaginal ultrasound diagnosis of fetal clubfeet at 13 weeks’ menstrual age. J Clin Ultrasound 1989; 17:518-20
  5. Benecerraf BR, Frigoletto FD. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of clubfoot. Radiology 1985; 155:211-3
  6. Tillett RL, Fisk NM, Murphy K, Hunt DM. Clinical outcome of congenital talipes equinovarus diagnosed antenatally by ultrasound. J Bone Joint Surg 2000; 82:876-80
  7. Carroll SGM, Lockyer H, Andrews H, et al. Outcome of fetal talipes following in utero sonographic diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18:437-40
  8. Hashimoto BE, Filly RA, Callen PW. Sonographic diagnosis of clubfoot in utero. J Ultrasound Med 1986; 5:81-3
  9. Kurjak A, Kos M, Benoit B, Kupesic S. The assessment of abnormal fetal anatomy. In: Kurjak A, Kupesic S, editors. Clinical application of 3D sonography, London: Parthenon Publishing Group 2000:133-42
  10. Shipp TD, Benacerraf BR. The significance of prenatally identified isolated clubfoot: Is amniocentesis indicated? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 178:60-2. 11.Malone FD, Marino T, Bianchi DW, Johnston K, Dalton M. Isolated clubfoot diagnosed prenatally: Is karyotyping indicated? Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95:437-40
  11. Yamomoto H. A clinical, genetic and epidemiologic study of congenital clubfoot. Jpn J Human Genet 1979; 24:37-44.