SavedAdd your journal

Journals / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2005 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3

Effect of cerclage technique on the pregnancy outcome

Tamer MUNGAN
EVRİM ERDEMOĞLU
Şevki ÇELEN
Pages
176–179
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is easier to apply, and less invasive than traditional McDonald suture.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVES: We planned a prospective-randomized trial to compare effect of modified McDonald and McDonald suture technique on the pregnancy outcome.
📊
Key Findings & Data:STUDY DESIGN: Patients were randomized into two groups; group I (n=40) were cerclaged at points 12 and 6'o clock positions on the cervix, group II (n=30) were cerclaged at four points at 12, 9, 6 and 3 o'clock positions with mersilen under inhaler anesthesia.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is easier to apply, and less invasive than traditional McDonald suture.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İleriye dönük çalışma · Gebelik yaşı · Gebelik sonucu

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We planned a prospective-randomized trial to compare effect of modified McDonald and McDonald suture technique on the pregnancy outcome. STUDY DESIGN: Patients were randomized into two groups; group I (n=40) were cerclaged at points 12 and 6'o clock positions on the cervix, group II (n=30) were cerclaged at four points at 12, 9, 6 and 3 o'clock positions with mersilen under inhaler anesthesia. Complications and duration of the operation, gestational week at the operation, delivery week, and pregnancy losses were analyzed. RESULTS: Characteristics of patients were similar in both of the groups (p>0,05). The mean duration of the procedure was 9.3±1.5 minutes in group I and 12.3±1.9 minutes in group II (p<0.001). The delivery week of subjects were significantly different between group I (36.9±2.6 week) and group II (33.0±82 week) (p=0.006) however, take a baby rate was similar in group I (%97.5) and group II (%90), respectively (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Modified McDonald suture at two points results in more term deliveries, although take a baby rate is similar. It is easier to apply, and less invasive than traditional McDonald suture.

🔖

Cite This Article

MUNGAN, T., ERDEMOĞLU, E., ÇELEN, Ş. (2005). Effect of cerclage technique on the pregnancy outcome. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3, 176–179. https://ajindex.com/articles/227569

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Weisman A, Jakobi P, Zahi S, Zimmer E. The effect of cervical cerclage on the course of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 76:168
  2. Ansari AH, Reynolds RA. Cervical incompetence: a review. J Reprod Med 1987; 32:161-70
  3. Li TC. Guides for practitioners. Recurrent miscarriage: principles of management. Human Reprod. 1998; 13:478-82
  4. MRC/RCOG working party on cervical cerclage. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 100:516-23
  5. Lidegaard O. Cervical incompetence and cerclage in Denmark 1980-1990. A register based epidemiological survey. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1994; 73:35-8
  6. Harger JH. Effectiveness of cervical cerclage. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984; 15:834
  7. Rush RW, Isaacs S, McPherson K, Jones L, Chalmers I, Grant A. A randomized controlled trial of cervical cerclage in women at high risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984; 91:724-30
  8. Shirodkar VN. A new method of operative treatment for habitual abortions in the second trimester of pregnancy. Antiseptic 1955; 52:299
  9. Hofmeister FJ, Schwartz WR, Vondrak BF, Martens W. Suture reinforcement of the incompetent cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1968; 101:58
  10. Bassaw B, Roopnarinesingh S. The efficiacy of cervical cerclage. West Indian Med J 1990; 39:39-42
  11. Jay D, lams, Robert L. The length of cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. N Engl J Med 1996; 334:567-72
  12. Guzman GR, Rosenberg JC. A new method using vaginal ultrasound and transfundal pressure to evaluate the asymptomatic incompetent cervix. Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 83:252-84
  13. Jewelewicz R. Incompetent cervix: pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. Seminars in perinatol. 1991; 15:156-61
  14. Christopher A. Sullivian. Sonographic evaluation of the uterine cervix. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America 1998; 25:623-37
  15. Althuisius SM, Dekker GA. The effect of therapeutic Mcdonald cerclage on cervical length as assessed by transvaginal ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 180:366-9. l6.Abdelhak YE, sheen JJ, Kuczynski E, Bianco A. Comparasion of delayed absorbable suture v nonabsorbable suture for treatment of incompetent cervix. J Perinat Med 1999; 27:250-2. 17.Frieden FJ, ordorica SA. Shirodkar operation: a reappraisal. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 163:830-3
  16. Golan A, Langer R, Wexler S, Segev E., Niv D., David MP. Cervical cerclage-its role in the pregnant anomalous uterus. Int JFertil 1990: 35:164-70. 19.Bider D, Kokia E, Seidman DS. Cervical cerclage for anomalous uteri. J reprod M