AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI InsightThe great majority (74%) of HS is required in order to define correctly nature of abnormalities which were revealed by HSG at higher rates (77%) CONCLUSIONS: This study show that diagnostic LS and HS are superior to HSG in terms of information provided by each of them.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine comparatively diagnostic values of HSG, LS and HS techniques and their accuracy. STUDY DESIGN: 173 patients in 82 event of was at average age of 27, age range was 18-43 years. Pelvic examination indicated primer infertility in 109 patients, seconder infertility in 50 patients, habitual abortus in 10 patients and amenorrhea in 4 patients. RESULTS: As a result in 53 cases in which tubal occlusion was found by HSG, 34(64%) of them are verified by LS and 19 (36%) of them are rejected. The great majority (74%) of HS is required in order to define correctly nature of abnormalities which were revealed by HSG at higher rates (77%) CONCLUSIONS: This study show that diagnostic LS and HS are superior to HSG in terms of information provided by each of them.
Özet
Bu çalışmanın amacı HSG LS ve HS uygulanmış vakalarda, bu tekniklerin karşılaştırmalı olarak diagnostik değerlerini ve doğruluklarını incelemektir.Kliniğimizde HSG ve diagnostik laparoskopi (LS) uygulanan 173 olgudan 82 olguda LS histeroskopi ile kombine edilmiştir. HSG uterin kavite normal olduğunda bunu göstermede efektif bir yöntemdir, intrauterin anomalileri yüksek oranlarda (%77)gösterebürnekle beraber lezyonun natürünü doğru ortaya koyabilmede çok başarılı değildir(%26).Bu konuda çoğunlukla (%74) HS ye ihtiyaç vardır.HSG ile saptanamayacak, ciddi infertilite nedenleri LS ile saptanabilir.Sonuç olarak diyagnostik LS veHS'nin sağladıkları ek bilgiler açısından HSG'ye üstün olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır.