AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI InsightIt can be used without colposcopic examination.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate diagnostic value of loop excision comparing with colposcopic biopsy in the cervical premalignant lesions. STUDY DESIGN: Consequently 200 patients having premalignant lesions in the cervical smear examination were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomized as loop excision group and colposcopic biopsy group for the diagnostic interventions. T test was used for statistical analysis and P< 0.05 was accepted to be statisticaly significant. RESULTS: Mean age was 38.2(26-63) and 126 of patients(63%) were in premenopausal period. There were no differances in demograpic characteristics of the two groups(p>0.05). Diagnostic value of loop excision was superior to colposcopic biopsy (p <0.05). CONCLUSION: Diagnostic value of loop excision in cervical premalignant lesion is reliable and over compared to colposcopic biopsy. It can be used without colposcopic examination.
Özet
Servikal premalign lezyonların tanısında loop eksizyon biopsinin değerini kolposkopik biopsi ile karşılaştırmak. Servikal smear incelemelerinde premalign servikal lezyonu olan 200 hasta çalışmaya alındı. Hastalar loop eksizyon ve kolposkopik biopsi için randomize edildi. İstatistiksel analizler için T testi kullanıldı ve P 0.05). Loop eksizyonun diagnostik değeri kolposkopik biopsiden üstün idi (p<0.05). Servikal premalign lezyonların tanısında loop eksizyon güvenilir ve kolposkopik biopsiden üstündür. Bu amaçla kolposkopik biopsi yapılmadan kullanılabilir.