Journals / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2004 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3

Cervical length changes during normal pregnancy by transvaginal ultrasonography

Pages
175–178
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Reference ranges for the trimesters might be more useful than a single cot-off value for more efficient early diagnosis and management of preterm labour.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To evaluate the relationship between cervical length and gestational age in uncomplicated pregnancy in nulliparous versus multiparous women.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Study Design: We studied a cross-sectional sample of 120 singleton pregnancies, including 58 nulliparous and 62 multiparous women.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Reference ranges for the trimesters might be more useful than a single cot-off value for more efficient early diagnosis and management of preterm labour.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Serviks uteri · Gebelik yaşı · Gebelik

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the relationship between cervical length and gestational age in uncomplicated pregnancy in nulliparous versus multiparous women. Study Design: We studied a cross-sectional sample of 120 singleton pregnancies, including 58 nulliparous and 62 multiparous women. The ultrasonographic assessment of the cervix was performed between 10 and 12, 22 and 24, and 32 and 34 weeks of gestation. The inclusion criteria were ultrasonographic confirmation of gestational age by a combination of reliable last menstrual period and ultrasonographic measurements, absence of any risk factors for preterm birth, and an uncomplicated pregnancy with expected delivery after 37 completed weeks. If the cervical canal appeared curved, the canal length was measured in multiple linear segments. Means, SDs, and 95% confidence limits were reported for each study period. Student t test was used to compare the groups. Results: A linear relationship was found between cervical length and gestational age (R = 0.90; R2 = 0.85; P < 0.001). Cervical length actually shows a progressive, linear decrease throughout the investigated period of gestation. Although cervical length at each trimester was longer in multiparous than in nulliparous women there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: There is a spontaneous shortening in the pregnant cervix throughout gestation, whit a more shortening of the cervical length from the 22-24-week scan to the 32-34-week scan. Reference ranges for the trimesters might be more useful than a single cot-off value for more efficient early diagnosis and management of preterm labour.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDEMİR, İ., DEMİRCİ, F., YÜCEL, O., MAYDA, A. (2004). Cervical length changes during normal pregnancy by transvaginal ultrasonography. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3, 175–178. https://ajindex.com/articles/227164

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Morrison JC. Preterm birth: a puzzle worth solving. Obsted Gynecol 1990; 76:5-12
  2. Mahony BS. Ultrasound of the cervix during pregnancy. Abdominal Imaging 1997; 22:569-78
  3. Jackson G, Ludmir J, Bader T. The accuracy of digital examination and ultrasound in the evaluation of the cervical length. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 79:214-8
  4. Gomez R, Galasso M, Romero R, et al. Ultrasonographic examination of the uterine cervix is better than cervical digital examination as a predictor of the likelihood of premature delivery in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171:956-64
  5. Onderoglu L. Digital examination and transperineal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length to assess risk of preterm delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1997; 59:223-8
  6. Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. N Engl J Med 1996; 334:567-72
  7. Kushnir O, Vigil DA, Izguierdo L, Schiff M, Curet LB. Vaginal ultrasonographic assessment of cervical length changes during normal pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162:991-3
  8. Zorzoli A, Soliani A, Perra M, Caravelli E, Galimberti A, Nicolini U. Cervical changes throughout pregnancy as assessed by transvaginal sonography. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84:960-4
  9. Gramellini D, Fieni S, Molina E, Berretta R, Vadora E. Tranvaginal sonographic cervical length changes during normal pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med 2002; 21:227-32
  10. Anderson HF. Transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasonography of the uterine cervix during pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound 1991; 19:77-83
  11. Dijkstra K, Janssen HCJP, Kuczynski E, Lockwood CJ. Cervical length in uncomplicated pregnancy: A study of sociodemographic predictors of cervical changes across gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180:639-44
  12. Brieger GM, Ning XH, Dawkins RR, et al. Tranvaginal sonographic assessment of cervical dynamics during the third trimester of normal pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997; 76:118-22
  13. Cook CM, Ellwood DA. A longitudinal study of the cervix in pregnancy using transvaginal ultrasound. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103:16-8
  14. Murakava H, Utumi T, Hasegawa I, Tanaka K, Fuzimori R. Evaluation of threatened preterm delivery by transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82:829-32
  15. Yılmaz HA, Seyyah Y, Ark HC. Transvaginal ultrasonografi ile normal gebelikte gebelik haftalarına göre servikal uzunluğun incelenmesi. Perinatolo