Journals / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2008 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2

Kliniğimizde IVF-ET uygulanan hastalarımızda çoğul doğum oranlarımızın irdelenmesi

The evaluation of multiple birth rates for patients who had IVF-ET procedure in our clinic

Pages
77–79
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We determined the multiple pregnancy rates among the total births, and our overall success rates, and compared those with the embryo transfer policies and the multiple pregnancy rates of other countries.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the multiple birth rates for the patients who had undergone IVF-ET procedure in our clinic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:STUDY DESIGN: Total number of births and the amount of the births following assisted reproductive techniques (ART) in 2006 in Gulhane Military Medical Academy was investigated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We determined the multiple pregnancy rates among the total births, and our overall success rates, and compared those with the embryo transfer policies and the multiple pregnancy rates of other countries.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the multiple birth rates for the patients who had undergone IVF-ET procedure in our clinic. STUDY DESIGN: Total number of births and the amount of the births following assisted reproductive techniques (ART) in 2006 in Gulhane Military Medical Academy was investigated. We determined the multiple pregnancy rates among the total births, and our overall success rates, and compared those with the embryo transfer policies and the multiple pregnancy rates of other countries. RESULTS: 120 out of 1797 births (6.6%) in 2006 was the result of ART. A total of 345 embryo transfers made resulted in 176 pregnancies (51%). Live birth rate per embryo transfer was 35%, (120/345). Multiple births were 42 (2.5%), and all were the result of the ART. The ratio of multiples in ART pregnancies were 35%, (42/120). CONCLUSION: Elective single embryo transfer should be promoted by explaining the patients the possible complications of the multiple pregnancies in detail.

Özet

Kliniğimizde IVF-ET uygulanan hastalarımızdaki çoğul doğum oranlarımızın irdelenmesi. Gülhane Askeri Tıp Akademisi Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum kli-niğindeki 2006 yılında gerçekleşen toplam doğum sayısı ve bu doğumlardaki yardımcı üreme tekniklerinin oranını araştırdık. Ayrıca bu doğumlar içerisinde çoğul gebelik doğum sayısını belirleyerek, genel başarı oranımız ve bu konudaki embriyo transfer politikası ile diğer ülkelerin aynı konudaki oranlarını karşılaştırdık. 2006 yılında gerçekleşen toplam 1797 doğumdan 120 tanesi yardımcı üreme tekniklerinden elde edilen gebeliklerdir (%6.6). Yine 2006 yılında 345 embriyo transferi yapılmış ve 176 gebelik elde edilmiştir (%51). Embriyo transferi başına canlı doğum oranı %35'dir (120/345). Çoğul doğum sayısı 42 (%2.5) iken bu doğumların tamamı yardımcı üreme teknikleri sonucu elde edilen gebeliklerdir ve bu gebelikler içerisindeki oranı da %35'dir (42/120). Hastalara doğum sonrası ve gebelik sırasında çoğul gebeliklerin olası komplikasyonları hakkında detaylı bilgiler verilerek hastalar elektif tek embriyo transferine özendirilmelidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DURU, N. K., GEZGİNÇ, K., KARAŞAHİN, K. E., ALANBAY, İ., FİDAN, U., BAŞER, İ. (2008). Kliniğimizde IVF-ET uygulanan hastalarımızda çoğul doğum oranlarımızın irdelenmesi. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2, 77–79. https://ajindex.com/articles/227149

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Steptoe PC and Edwards RG. Birth after the reimplanta-tion of a human embryo. Lancet 1978;2:366. 2.Nyboe-Andersen A, Gianaroli L and Nygren KG. European monitoring programme, European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2000. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2004;19::490-503. 3.Schieve LA, Meikle SF, Ferre C, Peterson HB, Jeng G and Wilcox LS. Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology. New EnglJMed2002;346:731-7. 4.Helmerhorst FM, Perquin DA, Donker D and Keirse MJ Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies. Br Med J 2004;328:261-5. 5.Jackson RA, Gibson KA, Wu YW and Croughan MS. Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103:551-63. 6.Stro''mberg B, Dahlquist G, Ericson A, Finnstro"m O, Ko ster M and Stjernqvist K. Neurological sequelae in children born after in-vitro fertilisation: a population-based study. Lancet 2002;359:461-5. 7.Pinborg A, Loft A, Schmidt L, Greisen G, Rasmussen S and Nyboe Andersen A. Neurological sequelae in twins born after assisted conception: controlled national study. BrMedJ2004;329:311. 8.Vilska S, Tiitinen A, Hyde'n-Granskog C and Hovatta O. Elective transfer of one Cinbryo results in an acceptable pregnancy rate and eliminates the risk of multiple birth. Hum Reprod 1999; 14:2392-5. 9.Wolner-Hanssen P and Rydhstroem H. Cost-effectiveness analysis of in-vitro fertilization: estimated costs per successful pregnancy after transfer of one or two embryos. Hum Reprod 1998; 13:88-94. 10.National Board of Health and Welfare Official Statistics of Sweden 2004. 11.Gleicher N, Barad D.The relative myth of elective single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:1337-44. 12.Buckett W and Tan SL. What is the most relevant standard of successin assisted reproduction? The importance of informed choice. Hum Reprod 2004;19:1043-5.