Journals / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2005 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3

Retrospective comparison of urografin versus standard therapy in postoperative intestinal obstructions after gynecologic and obstetric surgery

Pages
194–198
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION: It was concluded that water soluble contrast substances are effective, safe and easy to use in diagnosis and treatment of postoperative ileus.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic effect of water soluble contrast substances such as Urografin in postoperative intestinal obstructions following major gynecological and obstetrical surgical interventions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Following the diagnosis of ileus, standing plain abdominal X-ray (SPAR) was taken and 40 ml Urografin+40 ml water were administered to the patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION: It was concluded that water soluble contrast substances are effective, safe and easy to use in diagnosis and treatment of postoperative ileus.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ameliyat sonrası dönem · Diatrizoat meglumin · Bağırsak tıkanması

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic effect of water soluble contrast substances such as Urografin in postoperative intestinal obstructions following major gynecological and obstetrical surgical interventions. STUDY DESIGN: In this retrospective study, data from patients at the Departments of General Surgery or Gynecology-Obstetrics, who admitted with the diagnosis of or developed ileus were analyzed. Patient demographics, surgical procedures, treatment modalities, information about ileus, and results of Urografin study were recorded. Following the diagnosis of ileus, standing plain abdominal X-ray (SPAR) was taken and 40 ml Urografin+40 ml water were administered to the patients. Serial plain abdominal X-rays at standing position were taken at the 1st, 2nd, 4th and 6th hours after administration. If Urografin failed to pass to colon after 6 hours, ileus was treated. RESULTS: In 40 cases (74.07%), Urografin passage to colon was observed in 6 hours following the administration. Colon passage was most frequent between the first 2-4 hours (52.2%). These patients were treated medically (IV fluid replacement, naso-gastric decompression, antibiotics). In 14 patients (25.9%), no passage was present. Three of them recovered with medical treatment, while others underwent surgical intervention. Sensitivity was 93.02%, specificity was 100%, positive predictive value was 100% and negative predictive value was 78.5% for therapeutic efficacy of Urografin passage to colon 6 hours after administration. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that water soluble contrast substances are effective, safe and easy to use in diagnosis and treatment of postoperative ileus.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEDE, M., YAĞCI, G., KAYMAKÇIOĞLU, N., GÖKTOLGA, Ü., YENEN, M. C., BAŞER, İ., ÇETİNER, S. (2005). Retrospective comparison of urografin versus standard therapy in postoperative intestinal obstructions after gynecologic and obstetric surgery. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3, 194–198. https://ajindex.com/articles/227123

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Holmdahl L, Risberg B. Adhesions: prevention and complications in general surgery. Eur J Surg 1997; 163:169-74
  2. McEntee G, Pender D, Mulvin D, et al. Current spectrum of intestinal obstruction. Br J Surg 1987; 74:976-80
  3. Mucha P, Jr. Small intestinal obstruction. Surg Clin North Am 1987; 67:597-620
  4. Sosa J, Gardner B. Management of patients diagnosed as acute intestinal obstruction secondary to adhesions. Am Surg 1993; 59:125-8
  5. Brolin RE. Partial small bowel obstruction. Surgery 1984; 95:145-9
  6. Seror D, Feigin E, Szold A, Allweis TM, Cannon M, Nissan S, Freund HR. How conservatively can postoperative small bowel obstruction be treated? Am J Surg 1993; 165:121-5
  7. Assalia A, Schein M, Kopelman D, Hirshberg A, Hashmonai M. Therapeutic effect of oral Gastrografin in adhesive, partial small-bowel obstruction: a prospective randomized trial. Surgery 1994; 115:433-37
  8. Chen SC, Chang KJ, Lee PH, Wang SM, Chen KM, Lin FY. Oral urografin in postoperative small bowel obstruction. World J Surg 1999; 23:1051-4
  9. Watkins DT, Robertson CL. Water-soluble radiocontrast material in the treatment of postoperative ileus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 152:450-5
  10. Livingston EH, Passaro EP, Jr. Postoperative ileus. Dig DisSci 1990; 35:121-32. ll.MacMİllan SL, Kammerer-Doak D, Rogers RG, Parker KM. Early feeding and the incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms after major gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 96:604-8
  11. Jones PF, Munro A. Recurrent adhesive small bowel obstruction. World J Surg 1985; 9:868-75. 13.LaRosa JA, Saywell RM, Jr, Zollinger TW, Oser TL, Erner BK, McClain E. The incidence of adynamic ileus in postcesarean patients. Patient-controlled analgesia versus intramuscular analgesia. J Reprod Med 1993; 38:293-300
  12. Soriano D, Dulitzki M, Keidar N, Barkai G, Mashiach S, Seidman DS. Early oral feeding after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87:1006-8
  13. Kammen BF, Levine MS, Rubesin SE, Laufer I. Adynamic ileus after caesarean section mimicking intestinal obstruction: findings on abdominal radiographs. Br J Radiol 2000; 73:951-5. 16.Brolin RE, Krasna MJ, Mast BA. Use of tubes and radiographs in the management of small bowel obstruction. Ann Surg 1987; 206:126-33
  14. Deutsch AA, Eviatar E, Gutman H, Reiss R. Small bowel obstruction: a review of 264 cases and suggestions for management. Postgrad Med J 1989; 65:463-7. 18.Ericksen AS, Krasna MJ, Mast BA, Nosher JL, Brolin RE. Use of gastrointestinal contrast studies in obstru