Journals / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2008 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3

Doğum indüksiyonu uygulanan nurriparlarda başarılı vajinal doğum öngörü testi olarak indüksiyon öncesi servikal fetal fibronektin (FFN) değerlendirmesinin yeri

Value of pre-İnduction cervical fetal fibronectin (FFN) assessment as a predictor of succesful vaginal birth in nulliparas undergoing labor induction

Pages
150–153
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION: In nulliparas undergoing pre-induction cervical ripening, positive FFN test prior to labor induction did not predict successful vaginal birth within 24 hours.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: To determine the value of pre-induction assessment of cervical FFN in the prediction of succesful vaginal birth within 24 hours post-sampling.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Inclusion criterias were: gestational age between 36 to 42 weeks, singleton cephalic presentation of the fetus, intact membrane and Bishop score <6.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION: In nulliparas undergoing pre-induction cervical ripening, positive FFN test prior to labor induction did not predict successful vaginal birth within 24 hours.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the value of pre-induction assessment of cervical FFN in the prediction of succesful vaginal birth within 24 hours post-sampling. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective observational trial of nulliparous women undergoing labor induction. Inclusion criterias were: gestational age between 36 to 42 weeks, singleton cephalic presentation of the fetus, intact membrane and Bishop score <6. Pre-induction cervical ripening was performed by using 25 microgr intravaginal misoprostol (PGE1), repeated every four hours, up to a maximum dose of three doses. Induction was subsequently continued by oxytocin and amniotomy. Prior to cervical ripening, FFN samples were collected by using steril speculum and analyzed by standard quantitative immunoassay. RESULTS: A total number of 43 women met the inclusion criterias, of which 51.1% delivered vaginally within 24 hours of labor induction. There was no statistically significant difference in the rates of vaginal delivery betwen women with positive (84%) and negative (72.0%) FFN results (p=0.54), although more FFN positive cases were vaginally delivered. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of FFN in predicting successful vaginal birth within 24 hours of labor induction were:0.44,0.67,0.83 and 0.24, respectively. There were no differences in any of the neonatal outcomes between FFN negative and positive groups. Indications of cesarean section did not differ among two groups. CONCLUSION: In nulliparas undergoing pre-induction cervical ripening, positive FFN test prior to labor induction did not predict successful vaginal birth within 24 hours.

Özet

Yapılan bu gözlemsel, prospektif çalışmada nullipar olgularda indüksiyon öncesi servikal sıvıda fetal FFN'nin örnekleme sonrası ilk 24 saat içinde başarılı vajinal doğumu öngörmedeki yeri araştırılmıştır.36-42 hafta arası, Bishop skoru 6'nın altında ve membranları sağlam olan olan 43 olgu çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir. İndüksiyon: 25 mikrogram intravajinal misoprostol (PGE1), 4 saatte bir, toplam 3 doz şeklinde uygulanmıştır. Bishop skoru uygun hal gelen olgularda oksitosin ve arriniyotomi başlanmıştır. Ser-vikal olgunlaşma öncesi, FFN örnekleri steril spekulum muayenesi sırasında Dakron swab ile toplanmış ve standard semi-kantitatif immunoassay yöntemi ile sonuçlar yorumlanmıştır. Çalışmada, %51,1 olgu indüksiyon başlangıcından sonraki ilk 24 saat içinde vajinal yolla doğurtul m ustur. Pozitif (%84) ve negatif FFN (%72) sonuçları olan olgular arasında istatiksel önemde bir farka rastlanmamıştır. Testin ilk 24 saat içindeki vajinal doğumu öngörmedeki sensitivite, spesifisite, pozitif ve negatif öngörü değerleri sırasıyla, 0,44, 0,67, 0,83 ve 0,24'tür. FFN negatif ve pozitif olgular arasında yenidoğan sonuçları açısından bir farka rastlanmadı. Aynı zamanda sezaryen endi-kasyonları her iki grupta farklı bulunmadı.Sonuçta, indüksiyon öncesi servikal olgunlaştırıcı ilaç kullanılan nullipar olgularda, indüksiyon öncesi servikal FFN değerlendirmesi ilk 24 saat içindeki başarılı vajinal doğumu öngörmemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TANIR, H. M., ŞENER, K. T., YILDIZ, Z. (2008). Doğum indüksiyonu uygulanan nurriparlarda başarılı vajinal doğum öngörü testi olarak indüksiyon öncesi servikal fetal fibronektin (FFN) değerlendirmesinin yeri. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3, 150–153. https://ajindex.com/articles/227087

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. 1Arulkumaran S, Gibbs DM, Tambyraja RL, Heng SL, Ratnam SS. Aust NZJ Obstet Gynaecol 1985
  2. Seyb ST, Berka RJ, Socol ML, Dooley SL. Eisk of ce sarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 1999
  3. Baacke KA, Edwards RK. Preinduction cervical assessment. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006
  4. 49(3):564-72. 4.Rozenberg P, Goffinet F, Hessabi M. Comparison of the Bishop score, ultrasonographically measured cervical lenght, and fetal fibronectin assay in predicting time until delivery and type of delivery at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000
  5. Blanch G, Olah KS, Walkinshaw S. The presence of fetal fibronectin in the cervicovaginal secretions of women at term-its role in the assessment of women before labor induction and in the investigation of the physiologic mechanisms of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996
  6. 174 (1 Pt 1:262-6. 6.Ahner R, Egarter C, Kiss H, et al. Fetal fibronectin as a selection criterion for induction of term labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995
  7. 173(5):1513-7. 7.Peregrine E, O'Brien P, Omar R, Jauniaux E. Clnical and ultrasound parameters to predict the risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2006,107(2 Pt l):227-33. 8.Bartha JL, Romero-Carmona R,Martinez-Del-Fresco M, Comino-Delgado R. Bsihop score and transvaginal ultrasound for preinduction cervical assessment: a randomized clinical trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005
  8. Tan PC, Vallikkannu N, Suguna S, Quek KF, Hassan J. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical lenght vs. Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of cesarean delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007
  9. Sciscione A, Hoffman MK, DeLuca S, et al. Fetal fibronectin as a predictor of vaginal birth in nulliparas undergoing preinduction cervical ripening. Obstet Gynecol 2005
  10. Garite TJ, Casal D, Garcia-Alonso A, et al. Fteal fibronectin: a new tool for the prediction of successful induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol
  11. 175(6): 1516-21. 12.Tam WH, Tai SM, Rogers MS. Prediction of cervical response to prostaglandin E2 using fetal fibronectin. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999
  12. 78(10):861-5. 13.Reis FM, Gervasi MT,Florio P, Bracelente G, Fadalti M, Severi M, Petraglia F. Prediction of successful induction of labor at term: role of clinical history, digital examination, ultrasound assessment of the cervix, and fetal fibronectin assay. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003
  13. Mouw RJ, Egb