Journals / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2009 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3

Sezeryan seksiyo sayısının maternal ve obstetrik sonuçlara etkisi

Impact of cesarean section number on maternal and obstetric outcome

Pages
144–147
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION: Among the causes of morbidity clinically most important was the triad of placenta previa, placenta accreta and hysterectomy, was also responsible for the most serious risk to the mother with increasing number of C/S.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the maternal and obstetric outcomes associated with increasing number of cesarean sections (C/Ss).
📊
Key Findings & Data:STUDY DESIGN: The clinical records of 408 women who were delivered by C/S at our clinic were examined for some maternal and neonatal outcomes, retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION: Among the causes of morbidity clinically most important was the triad of placenta previa, placenta accreta and hysterectomy, was also responsible for the most serious risk to the mother with increasing number of C/S.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the maternal and obstetric outcomes associated with increasing number of cesarean sections (C/Ss). STUDY DESIGN: The clinical records of 408 women who were delivered by C/S at our clinic were examined for some maternal and neonatal outcomes, retrospectively. The pregnant women were assigned to groups based on previous number of C/S; group 1 was consisted of the cases that had no C/S, group 2 one C/S, group 3 two C/Ss and group 4 three and more C/Ss. RESULTS: The most common indication for first C/S was fetal distress with 60 ( 30.3% ) of 198 cases. Mean maternal age, gestational age, birth weight, 1 and 5 minute Apgar scores, operating time, difference of post-op and pre-op hemoglobin level, and length of postoperative hospitalization were similar among groups (p>0.05). The ratio of placenta previa, and blood transfusion were significantly high in group 4 compared to group 1, 2, and 3 (p<0.05). Hysterectomy was performed in 5 (1.5%) cases and maternal mortality occured in 2 (0.6%) cases. CONCLUSION: Among the causes of morbidity clinically most important was the triad of placenta previa, placenta accreta and hysterectomy, was also responsible for the most serious risk to the mother with increasing number of C/S.

Özet

AMAÇ: Artan sezeryan seksiyo (SS) sayısı ile ilgili maternal ve obstetrik sonuçları araştırmak. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Kliniğimizde SS ile doğum yapan 408 gebenin klinik kayıtları bazı maternal ve neonatal morbidite yönünden incelendi. Gebe kadınlar daha önce oldukları SS sayısına göre gruplandırıldılar; grup 1 daha önce hiç SS olmayan, grup 2 bir SS olan, grup 3 iki SS olan ve grup 4 üç ve daha fazla SS olan olgulardan oluşmaktaydı. BULGULAR: İlk defa SS olan grupta en sık SS endikasyonu 198 olguda 60 (%30,3) olguyla fetal distresti. Ortalama anne yaşı, gebelik haftası, doğum ağırlığı, 1 ve 5. dakika Apgar skorları, operasyon süresi, post-op ve pre-op hemoglobin farkı ve postoperatif hastanede kalış süresi bütün gruplarda benzerdi (p>0,05). Plasenta previa ve kan transfüzyonu oranları grup 1, 2 ve 3 ile karşılaştırıldığında grup 4’te anlamlı olarak yüksekti (p<0.05). Beş (%1,5) olguya histerektomi yapıldı ve 2 (0,5%) olguda maternal mortalite gelişti. SONUÇ: Morbidite nedenleri arasında klinik olarak en önemli olan plasenta previa, plasenta akreta ve histerektomi triadı, ayrıca artan SS sayısı ile ilgili anne için olan en ciddi maternal riskten de sorumluydu.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARIKAN, C. D., COŞKUN, A., ÖZER, A., KIRAN, H., TOK, A., ZENCİR, E. (2009). Sezeryan seksiyo sayısının maternal ve obstetrik sonuçlara etkisi. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3, 144–147. https://ajindex.com/articles/227078

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Gonzalez-Perez GJ, Vega-Lopez MG, Cabrera-Pivaral C, Munoz A, Valle A. Caesarean sections in Mexico: are there too many? Health Policy Plan 2001;16:62-7
  2. Buist R, Brown J, McNamara T. For whom is the caesarean section rate high? N Z Med J 1999;112:469-71
  3. Paterson-Brown S, Fisk NM. Caesarean section: every woman’s right to choose? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1997; 9: 351-5
  4. Seidman DS, Paz I, Nadu A, Dollberg S, Stevenson K, Gale R, et al. Are multiple caesarean sections safe? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1994;57:7-12
  5. Kirkinen P. Multiple caesarean sections: outcomes and complications. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 95: 778-82
  6. Soltan MH, Al Nuaim L, Khashoggi T, Chowdhury N, Kangave D, Adelusi B. Sequelae of repeat cesarean sections. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1996; 52: 127-32
  7. Tamale-Sali EG, Iskander MN. Is there a risk of lower segment scar rupture in pregnancy after multiple caesarean section? J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 12: 19-21
  8. Chazotte C, Cohen WR. Catastrophic complications of previous cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163:738-42
  9. Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM. The association of placenta previa with history of cesarean delivery and abortion: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177:1071-8
  10. Lynch CM, Kearney R, Turner MJ. Maternal morbidity after elective repeat caesarean section after two or more previous procedures. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003; 106: 10-3
  11. Lilford JR, van Coeverden de Groot HA, Moore PJ, Bingham P. The relative risks of caesarean section (intrapartum and elective) and vaginal delivery: a detailed analysis to exclude the effects of medical disorders and other acute preexisting physiological disturbances. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97: 883-92
  12. Uygur D, Gun Ö, Kelekci S, Ozturk A, Ugur M, Mungan T. Multiple repeat caesarean section: is it safe?. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2005; 119: 171-5
  13. Rashid M, Rashid RS. Higher order repeat cesarean sections: how safe are five or more? BJOG 2004;111:1090-4
  14. Nisenblat V, Barak S, Griness OB, Degani S, Ohel G, Gonen R. Maternal complications associated with multiple cesarean deliveries.Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:21-6
  15. Hershkovitz R, Fraser D, Mazor M, Leiberman JR. One or multiple previous cesarean sections are associated with similar increased frequency of placenta praevia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1995; 62:185-8
  16. Makoha FW, Felimban HM, Fathuddien MA, Roomi F, Ghabra T. Multiple cesarean section morbidity.