Journals / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2010 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

Türkiye’de eğitim durumu daha önceki başarısız kontrasepsiyon sayısı cerrahi düşük sonrası kontraseptif tercihini etkilemiyor

Educational status, number of previous contraceptive failure do not effect the women’s contraceptive preference after surgical abortion in Turkey

Pages
98–102
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Our study suggests that educational status, number previous contraceptive failure or maternal age does not effect the contraceptive preference after surgical abortion.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the determinants of the contraceptive preference of couples after surgical abortion result of contraceptive failure or no contraception.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Study Design: Study population consisted of 302 women who admitted to Dr.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Our study suggests that educational status, number previous contraceptive failure or maternal age does not effect the contraceptive preference after surgical abortion.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the determinants of the contraceptive preference of couples after surgical abortion result of contraceptive failure or no contraception. Study Design: Study population consisted of 302 women who admitted to Dr. Sami Ulus Maternity and Women’s Health Teaching and Research Hospital family planning unit and underwent surgical abortion. All pregnancies were in their 5-10 th weeks of gestation. Gravida, parity, number of previous surgical abortions, living children number, last pregnancy status with current contraceptive method were recorded. Results: Mean age, gravida, parity, number of previous surgical abortions and living children were 31.05±6.52 (19-46 years), 4.30±1.83 (1-11), 2.33±1.32 (0-7), 0.96±1.05 (0-5), 2.28±1.29 (0-7) respectively. There were 183 (60,6%) women with previous surgical abortions, mean number of surgical abortions were 1.59±0.6. Among these patients there were 82 (45%) patients using no contraceptive method and 55 (30%) women were using coitus interruptus. Condoms were being used only by 29 (16%) women. Oral contraceptives (OCS) were being used in 11 (6%) women. No association was observed between condom or OCS use and educational status (p=0.786) in these patients . Condom or OCS users a little bit younger but not reached statistical significance (p=0.071). Women with different contraceptive use were similar in terms of gravida, parity, interval from previous pregnancy (p=0.423, p=0.402, 0.467 respectively). No association was obtained between number of previous surgical abortion, current contraceptive use (p=0.386) and educational status (p=0.735). Conclusion: Our study suggests that educational status, number previous contraceptive failure or maternal age does not effect the contraceptive preference after surgical abortion.

Özet

AMAÇ: Bu çalışmanın amacı, başarısız kontrasepsiyon sonu cu cerrahi düşük sonrası kontraseptif tercihinin belirleyicileri ni araştırmak. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Çalışma grubu Dr. Sami Ulus Kadın Do ğum, Çocuk Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları Eğitim Araştırma Hasta nesi aile planlamasına başvuran ve cerrahi düşük yaptırılan 302 hastadan oluşuyordu. Tüm gebelikler 5-10 gestasyonel hafta arasında idi. Gravida, parite, daha önceki cerrahi düşük sayısı, yaşayan çocuk sayısı, son gebelik durumu ve kontra septif metodu kaydedildi. BULGULAR: Ortalama yaş, gravida, parite, daha önceki cer rahi düşük sayısı ve yaşayan çocuk sayısı sırası ile 31.05±6.52 (19-46 years), 4.30±1.83 (1-11), 2.33±1.32 (0-7), 0.96±1.05 (0- 5), 2.28±1.29 (0-7) idi. Cerrahi düşüğü olan 183 (60,6%) has ta vardı ve ortalama cerrahi düşük sayısı 1.59±0.6 idi. Bu has taların 82 (45%) tanesi kontrasepsiyon kullanmıyor, 55 (30%) kadın geri çekme kullanıyordu. Kondomu sadece 29 (16%) ka dın kullanıyordu. Oral kontraseptif 11 (6%) kadında kullanılı yordu. Kondom veya oral kontraseptif kullanımı ve eğitim du rumu arasında ilişki izlenmedi (p=0.786). Kondom veya oral kontraseptif kullanıcıları daha gençti fakat fark anlamlı değildi (p=0.071). Farklı kontraseptif kullanıcıları gravida, parite ve son gebelikten sonraki süre bakımından benzerdi ( sırası ile, p=0.423, p=0.402, 0.467). Önceki cerrahi düşük sayısı, son kullanılan kontraseptif metod (p=0.386) ve eğitim düzeyi ara sında ilişki elde edilemedi (p=0.735). SONUÇ: Çalışmamıza göre, eğitim durumu, daha önceki ba şarısız kontrasepsiyon sayısı ve anne yaşı cerrahi düşük son rası kontrasepsiyon tercihini etkilemiyor.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZKAYA, E., KORKMAZ, V., KARA, O. F., KÜÇÜKÖZKAN, T. (2010). Türkiye’de eğitim durumu daha önceki başarısız kontrasepsiyon sayısı cerrahi düşük sonrası kontraseptif tercihini etkilemiyor. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 98–102. https://ajindex.com/articles/227043

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Ciftçioğlu S, Erci B. Coitus interruptus as a contraceptive method: Turkish women's perceptions and experiences. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65(8):1686-94
  2. Yanikkerem E, Acar H, Elem E. Withdrawal users' per ceptions of and experience with contraceptive methods in Manisa, Turkey. Midwifery. 2006;22(3):274-84
  3. Aytekin NT, Pala K, Irgil E, Aytekin H. Family planning choices and some characteristics of coitus interruptus users in Gemlik, Turkey. Womens Health Issues. 2001;11(5):442-7
  4. U.S. Bureau of the Census, International data base coun try summary: Turkey, 2008; 24
  5. Turkish Statistical Institute, Population and development indicators, 2007, 2008; 24
  6. Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies (HIPS) and Macro International, Inc., Turkish Demographic and Health Survey, 1998, Ankara, Turkey: HIPS; and Calverton, MD, USA: Macro International, Inc., 1999
  7. HIPS, Turkey Demographic and Health Survey, 2003, Ankara, Turkey: HIPS, 2004
  8. Kulczycki A, The determinants of withdrawal use in Turkey: a husband’s imposition or a woman’s choice? Social Science & Medicine, 2004, 59(5):1019–1033
  9. Ortayli N et al., Why withdrawal? Why not withdrawal? Men’s perspectives, Reproductive Health Matters, 2005, 13(25):164–173
  10. Ergöçmen BA et al., An Analytical Insight into a Traditional Method: Withdrawal Use in Turkey, Ankara, Turkey: HIPS; and Calverton, MD, USA: ORC Macro, 2001
  11. Yannikkerem E, Acar H and Elem E, Withdrawal users’s perceptions of and experience with contraceptive methods in Manisa, Turkey, Midwifery, 2006, 22(3):274–284
  12. Kulczycki A. Husband-Wife Agreement,Power Relations And Contraceptive Use in Turkey. International Family Planning Perspectives,2008,34(3):127–137
  13. El Hamri N. Approaches to family planning in Muslim communities. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2010; 36(1):27-31
  14. Olinto MT, Moreira-Filho Dde C. Risk factors and pre dictors of induced abortion: a population-based study. Cad Saude Publica. 2006;22(2):365-75
  15. Ceylan A, Ertem M, Saka G, Akdeniz N. Post abortion family planning counseling as a tool to increase contra ception use. BMC Public Health. 2009 15;9:20
  16. Rahnama P, Hidarnia A, Shokravi FA, Kazemnejad A, Oakley D, Montazeri A. Why Iranian married women use withdrawal instead of oral contraceptives? A qualitative study from Iran. BMC Public Health. 2010 28;10:289
  17. Zurriaga O, Martínez-Beneito MA, Galmés Truyols A, Torne MM, Bosch S, Bosser R, Portell Arbona M. Recourse to induced aborti