Journals / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2010 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1

Selçuk Üniversitesinde beş yıllık doğum oranları ve sezaryen endikasyonları

Birth rates and cesarean indications at Selçuk University during five -year period

Pages
22–25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We concluded that to determine the real indications for primary cesarean deliveries and to be more selective and careful are assumed to decrease the cesarean delivery rates.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to evaluate the rates, indications and complications of cesarean sections (CS) in our hospital during 5 years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:STUDY DESIGN: Patients who gave birth between January 2004 and December 2008 in our clinic were enrolled in this study and retrospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We concluded that to determine the real indications for primary cesarean deliveries and to be more selective and careful are assumed to decrease the cesarean delivery rates.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to evaluate the rates, indications and complications of cesarean sections (CS) in our hospital during 5 years. STUDY DESIGN: Patients who gave birth between January 2004 and December 2008 in our clinic were enrolled in this study and retrospectively analyzed. The CS rates, its complications, indications, and maternal mortality and morbidity rates were studied. RESULTS: The total number of births in five years was 11121. Of these births, 4818 (43.32%) were vaginal births and the remaining 6303 (56.67%) were cesarean deliveries. Previous cesarean deliveries were the major indication with 2118 (33.6%) cases, fetal distress with 880 (13.96%) cases, elective cesarean with 715 (11.34%) and cephalo-pelvic disproportion (CPD) with 622 (9.86%) cases. Eight cases of maternal mortality were detected in CS group (12.69/10000). The morbidity rate was found to be 12%. CONCLUSIONS: The rates of cesarean deliveries are increasing day by day. The increased rates of previous cesarean deliveries are a critical factor for the risks of recurrent surgeries and cost-effectiveness. We concluded that to determine the real indications for primary cesarean deliveries and to be more selective and careful are assumed to decrease the cesarean delivery rates.

Özet

AMAC: kliniğimizde 5 yıllık sürede yapılan sezaryen oranları, endikasyonları ve komplikasyonlarını değerlendirmek. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Kliniğimizde Ocak 2004 ile Aralık 2008 tarihleri arasında doğum yapan hastalar retrospektif olarak incelendi. Sezaryen oranları, komplikasyonları, endikasyonları, maternal mortalite ve morbidite oranları incelendi. BULGULAR: Çalışmamızda 5 yılda kliniğimizde toplam doğum sayısı 11121 idi. Bunun 4818’ini (%43,32) vajinal doğumlar, 6303’ünü (%56,67) sezaryenler oluşturuyordu. Sezaryen endikasyonlarından eski sezaryen 2118 (%33,6) vaka ile başı çekmekte idi, fetal distres 880 (%13,96), elektif sezaryen 715 (%11,34) ve baş-pelvis uyumsuzluğu (CPD) nedeniyle 622 (%9,86) hastaya sezaryen yapıldı. Çalışmamızda sezaryen olan hastalarda 8 maternal mortalite vakası saptandı (12,69/10000). Morbidite oranı %12 olarak bulundu. SONUÇ: Sezaryen oranları her geçen gün artmaktadır. Eski sezaryen oranının giderek artması, tekrarlayan operasyon riskleri ve maliyeti konusunda endişe vericidir. Primer sezaryen endikasyonlarının belirlenmesinde daha dikkatli ve seçici davranılmasının sezaryen oranlarını azaltacağı kanısındayız.

🔖

Cite This Article

BALCI, O., ÖZDEMİR, S., MAHMOUD, A. S., ACAR, A. (2010). Selçuk Üniversitesinde beş yıllık doğum oranları ve sezaryen endikasyonları. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1, 22–25. https://ajindex.com/articles/227040

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Wolman WL, Chalmers B, Hofmeyr GJ, Nikodem VC. Postpartum depression and companionship in the clinical birth environment: a randomized, controlled study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168:1388-93
  2. Deep R. Cesarean delivery and other surgical procedures. In: Gabbe S, Niebly J, Simpson JL. Obstetrics: Normal and problem pregnancies. 2. ed. New York: Churchill Livingston, 1991;635
  3. Penna L, Arulkumaran S. Cesarean section for non-medical reasons. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2003;82:399-409
  4. Ryding EL. Investigation of 33 women who demanded a cesarean section for personal reasons. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1993;72:280-5
  5. Durfee R. Cesarean Section. Nichol’s Gynecologic and Obstetric surgery. Chapter 67. Mosby-Year Book Inc. Westline, 1993;1075-1122
  6. World Health Organization. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet 1985;2:436-7 7. Abbassi H, Aboulfalah A, Morsad F, Matar N, Himmi A, Mansouri AE. Maternal complications of cesarean section: retrospective analysis of 3,231 interventions at the Casablanca University Hospital, Morocco. Sante 2000;10:419-23
  7. FIGO statement on caesarean section (2007).
  8. Ventura SJ, Martin JA, Curtin SC, Mathews TJ. Report of final natality statistics, 1996. Mon Vital Stap Rep 1998; 46:1-99
  9. Resnik R. Can a 29% cesarean delivery rate possibly be justified? Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:752-4
  10. Florica M, Stephansson O, Nordstrom L. Indications associated with increased cesarean section rates in a Swedish hospital. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2006;92:181-5
  11. Betrán AP, Merialdi M, Lauer JA, Bing-Shun W, Thomas J, Van Look P, Wagner M, Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2007;21:98-113
  12. Koc I. Increased cesarean section rates in Turkey. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2003;8:1-10
  13. Yalinkaya A, Bayhan G, Kale A, Yayla M. The rate and indications of cesarean sections at Dicle University during 20 years’ period. T Klin Jinekol Obst 2003;13:356-60
  14. Rates of cesarean delivery in United States, 1993, MMVR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1995;44:303-7
  15. Notzon FC, Cnattingius S, Bergsjo P, Cole S, Taffel S, Irgens L, Daltveit AK. Cesarean section delivery in the 1980s: international comparison by indication. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:495-504
  16. Perlow JH, Morgan MA. Massive maternal obesity and perioperative cesarean morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:560-5
  17. Mushinski M. Average charges for uncomplicated ce