Journals / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2021 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1

Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on COMPI Fertility Problem Stress Scale and the State-Trait Anxiety Scale in Patients Undergoing IVF/ICSI

Pages
49–55
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although participants were mostly stressed because of the COVID-19 outbreak, they didn’t change their in vitro fertilization treatment plans during the outbreak.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effect of the COVID-19 outbreak on infertile couples dealing with stress and anxiety during in vitro fertilization treatment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:STUDY DESIGN: 252 infertile patients who applied for in vitro fertilization treatment were included in this cross-sectional study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although participants were mostly stressed because of the COVID-19 outbreak, they didn’t change their in vitro fertilization treatment plans during the outbreak.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effect of the COVID-19 outbreak on infertile couples dealing with stress and anxiety during in vitro fertilization treatment. STUDY DESIGN: 252 infertile patients who applied for in vitro fertilization treatment were included in this cross-sectional study. Data were collected via four data collection tools including socio-demographic form, COVID-19 Inventory (COVID-I), COMPI fertility problem stress scale (COMPI-FPSS), and statetrait anxiety scale. Data analysis was conducted by SPSS statistical software included statistical analysis such as averages, standard deviations, correlation, regression, and t-test. RESULTS: Both negative and weak correlations were found between COMPI fertility problem stress scale and subscales of state-trait anxiety scale as well as the total score of state-trait anxiety scale. In terms of socio-demographic characteristics of the participants and their responses in state-trait anxiety scale and ISS forms, the correlation coefficients were also so low. The results also showed that public officials, health professionals, and educators showed lower state-trait anxiety scale (stress-related anxiety) scores. CONCLUSION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was an increase in spontaneous pregnancy expectations. Although participants were mostly stressed because of the COVID-19 outbreak, they didn’t change their in vitro fertilization treatment plans during the outbreak.

🔖

Cite This Article

YURCİ, A., KARAYAĞIZ, Ş. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on COMPI Fertility Problem Stress Scale and the State-Trait Anxiety Scale in Patients Undergoing IVF/ICSI. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1, 49–55. https://ajindex.com/articles/226947

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Cwikel J. Gidron Y. Sheiner E. Psychological interactions with infertility among women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004;117(2):126-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb. 2004.05.004
  2. Roupa Z. Polikandrioti M. Sotiropoulou P. Faros E, Koulouri A. Wozniak G., et al. Causes of infertility in women at reproductive age. Health Science Journal. 2009;3(2):80-7
  3. Seibel MM, Taymor ML. Emotional aspects of infertility. Fertil Steril. 1982;37(2):137-45. Doi: 10.1016/s0015- 0282 (16)46029-2
  4. Iammarrone E, Balet R, Lower AM, Gillott C, Grudzinskas JG. Male infertility. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;17(2):211-29. Doi: 10.1016/ s1521-6934(02)00147-5
  5. Geelhoed DW, Nayembil D, Asare K, Schagen van Leeuwen JH, van Roosmalen J. Infertility in rural Ghana. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002;79(2):137-42. doi: 10.1016/ s0020-7292(02)00237-0
  6. Deyhoul N. Mohamaddoost T. Hosseini M. Infertility-related risk factors: a systematic review. Int J Women’s Health Reprod Sci. 2017;5(1):24-9. doi: 10.15296/ijwhr.2017.05
  7. WHO, Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard, 2020. Available at
  8. Li R. Yin T. Fang F. Li Q. Chen J. Wang Y. et al. Potential risks of SARS-Cov-2 infection on reproductive health. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020;41(1):89-95. doi: 10.1016/ j.rbmo.2020.04.018
  9. Vaiarelli A. Bulletti C. Cimadomo D. Borini A. Alviggi C. Ajossa S. et al. COVID-19 and ART: the view of the Italian Society of Fertility and Sterility and Reproductive Medicine. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020;40(6):755-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.04.003
  10. Zahra D. Sadatmahalleh SJ. Samaneh Y. Mahnaz BK. Anoshiravan K. Influential Factors on quality of life in married Iranian women during the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020: A Path Analysis. Research Square. 2020. doi:10. 21203/rs.3.rs-27439/v1
  11. Petok WD. High Anxiety: Helping your patients (and yourself) cope with the impact of COVID-19. Top Obstet Gynecol. 2020;40(8):1-7
  12. ESHRE COVID-19 Working Group, Vermeulen N, Ata B, Gianaroli L, Lundin K, Mocanu E, et al. A picture of medically assisted reproduction activities during the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe. Hum Reprod Open. 2020;2020(3):hoaa035. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa035
  13. Veiga A. Gianaroli L. Ory S. Horton M. Feinberg E. Penzias A. Assisted reproduction and COVID-19: A joint statement of ASRM, ESHRE and IFFS. Fertil Steril. 2020;114(3):484-5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.06.044
  14. Roy D. Tripathy S. Kar SK. Sharma N. Verma SK. Kaushal V. Study of knowledge, a