Journals / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2021 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1

Factors Indicating the Accuracy of Fetal Weight Estimation in Preterm Newborns with Normal Amniotic Fluid Volume

Pages
17–21
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Examination during labor was the most important factor for the prediction of the absolute percentage error, followed by gestational age at delivery, presence of small for gestational age, and body-mass-index.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: To determine the factors indicating the accuracy of fetal weight estimation in the last prenatal ultrasonography before delivery in preterm newborns with normal amniotic fluid volume.
📊
Key Findings & Data:STUDY DESIGN: Three hundred and seventy-one singleton pregnancies with normal amniotic fluid volume and delivered at between 24+0 and 37+0 gestational weeks were evaluated in a retrospective study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Examination during labor was the most important factor for the prediction of the absolute percentage error, followed by gestational age at delivery, presence of small for gestational age, and body-mass-index.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

OBJECTIVE: To determine the factors indicating the accuracy of fetal weight estimation in the last prenatal ultrasonography before delivery in preterm newborns with normal amniotic fluid volume. STUDY DESIGN: Three hundred and seventy-one singleton pregnancies with normal amniotic fluid volume and delivered at between 24+0 and 37+0 gestational weeks were evaluated in a retrospective study. Any possible associations between the absolute percentage error of fetal weight estimations and the maternal and fetal data were examined. RESULTS: In 135 of the 371 women (36%), the absolute percentage error was greater than 10%. The mean absolute percentage error was 8.7±7.5%. The mean absolute percentage errors were 4.1±2.7% and 16.8±6.4% in the accurate and inaccurate estimation groups, respectively. The rate of women examined during labor was significantly higher in the inaccurate estimation group compared to the accurate estimation group. There were no significant differences in age, body-massindex, gestational age at delivery, estimated-fetal-weight, actual birth weight, days from the last ultrasound examination to delivery, small for gestational age rate, placenta localization or fetal presentation between the two groups. Examination during labor (β=0.224) was the most important factor for the prediction of the absolute percentage error, followed by gestational age at delivery (β=–0.198), presence of (β=–0.158), and bodymass-index (β=0.142). CONCLUSION: In 36% of our study population, the absolute percentage error was >10%. Examination during labor was the most important factor for the prediction of the absolute percentage error, followed by gestational age at delivery, presence of small for gestational age, and body-mass-index.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜRALP, O., TÜTEN, N., TÜTEN, A., GEZER, A. (2021). Factors Indicating the Accuracy of Fetal Weight Estimation in Preterm Newborns with Normal Amniotic Fluid Volume. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1, 17–21. https://ajindex.com/articles/226941

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Dudley NJ. A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 25(1):80-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.1751
  2. Kurmanavicius J. Burkhardt T. Wisser J. Huch R. Ultrasonographic fetal weight estimation: accuracy of formulas and accuracy of examiners by birth weight from 500 to 5000 g. J Perinat Med. 2004;32(2):155-61. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2004.028
  3. Siemer J. Egger N. Hart N. Meurer B. Müller A. Dathe O. et al. Fetal weight estimation by ultrasound: comparison of 11 different formulae and examiners with differing skill levels. Ultraschall Med. 2008;29(2):159-64. doi: 10.1515/ JPM.2004.028
  4. Huber C. Zdanowicz JA. Mueller M. Surbek D. Factors influencing the accuracy of fetal weight estimation with a focus on preterm birth at the limit of viability: a systematic literature review. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2014;36(1):1-8. doi: 10.1159/000358518
  5. Melamed N. Yogev Y. Ben-Haroush A. Meizner I. Mashiach R. Glezerman M. Does use of a sex-specific model improve the accuracy of sonographic weight estimation? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39(5):549-57. doi: 10.1002/uog.10064
  6. Berger TM. Bernet V. El Alama S. Fauchere JC. Hösli I. Irion O. et al. Perinatal care at the limit of viability between 22 and 26 completed weeks of gestation in Switzerland. 2011 revision of the Swiss recommendations. Swiss Med Wkly. 2011;141:w13280. doi: 10.4414/ smw.2011.13280
  7. Tyson JE. Parikh NA. Langer J. Green C. Higgins RD. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Intensive care for extreme prematurity - moving beyond gestational age. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(16):1672-81. doi:10.1056/ NEJMoa073059
  8. Heer IM. Kumper C. Vogtle N. Muller-Egloff S. Dugas M. Strauss A. Analysis of factors influencing the ultrasonic fetal weight estimation. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2008;23 (3):204-10. doi: 10.1159/000116742
  9. Mills MD. Nageotte MP. Elliott JP. Crade M. Dorchester W. Reliability of ultrasonographic formulary in the prediction of fetal weight and survival of very-low-birthweight infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;163(5 Pt 1): 1568-74. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)90629-l
  10. Edwards A. Goff J. Baker L. Accuracy and modifying factors of the sonographic estimation of fetal weight in a high-risk population. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001; 41(2):187-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.2001.tb01206.x
  11. Ragosch V. Entezami M. Hundertmark S. Mutz A. Becker R. Weitzel H. Accuracy of ultrasound weight assessment- -comparison of v