Journals / Gülhane Tıp Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 4

Konjenital mandibuler lateral eksikliğinin multidisipliner yaklaşım ile tedavisinde mini implant kullanımı: olgu sunumu

Use of mini implants in the multidisciplinary treatment of congenitally missing mandibular lateral incisors: A case report

Pages
311–316
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In cases with insufficient bone mini implants may be preferred instead of conventional implants.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this case report is to present the multidisciplinary treatment of a patient with congenitally missing mandibular lateral incisors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the intraoral examination of a 35 years old female patient, it was determined that neighbor teeth were migrated to the space of the congenital missing mandibular lateral incisors.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In cases with insufficient bone mini implants may be preferred instead of conventional implants.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this case report is to present the multidisciplinary treatment of a patient with congenitally missing mandibular lateral incisors. In the intraoral examination of a 35 years old female patient, it was determined that neighbor teeth were migrated to the space of the congenital missing mandibular lateral incisors. Sufficient mesiodistal space was prepared by orthodontic treatment to place the implants. 3 dimensional (3D) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) revealed that vestibulolingual and mesiodistal bone dimensions were not adequate for conventional implants so crowns supported with mini implants were performed to the patient. At the end of multidisciplinary treatment approach, stabile occlusion and esthetic appearance was achieved. In cases with insufficient bone mini implants may be preferred instead of conventional implants.

Özet

Vaka sunumunda amaç, konjenital mandibular lateral eksikliği olan hastanın multidisipliner tedavi yaklaşımı ile tedavisinin açıklanmasıdır. 35 yaşında bayan hastanın ağız içi muayenesinde komşu dişlerin konjenital mandibular lateral diş eksikliği boşluğuna doğru hareket ettiği belirlendi. İmplant yerleştirilmesi amacıyla yeterli mesiodistal mesafe ortodontik tedaviyle hazırlandı. İmplant yerleştirilecek bölgedeki kemiğin incelenmesi amacıyla 3 boyutlu computerize tomografi yöntemine başvuruldu ancak vestibulolingual ve mesiodistal olarak kemik boyutlarının standart implant uygulaması için uygun olmadığı belirlendi ve hastaya mini implant destekli kuron yapımına karar verildi. Multidisipliner tedavi yaklaşımı sonunda uygun bir kapanış ilişkisi ve estetik bir görünüme ulaşılmış oldu. Yetersiz kemiğin mevcut olduğu vakalarda standart implantlar yerine mini implantlar tercih edilebileceği değerlendirilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATAY, A., KARAÇAY, Ş., GÜRBÜZER, B., TUNALI, M., SÜER, B. T. (2012). Konjenital mandibuler lateral eksikliğinin multidisipliner yaklaşım ile tedavisinde mini implant kullanımı: olgu sunumu. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 4, 311–316. https://ajindex.com/articles/226393

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Burzynski NJ,Escobar VH. Classification and genetics of numeric anomalies of dentition. Birth Defects. 1983;19: 95-106
  2. Anderson BL, Thompson GW, Popovich F. Evolutionary dental changes. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 1975;43 (1): 95-102
  3. Kindelan JD, Rysiecki G, Childs WP. Hypodontia: genotypeor environment? A case report of monozygotic twins. British Journal of Orthodontics 1998; 25(3): 175-8
  4. Stafne EC, Gibilisco JA. Oral roentgenographic diagnosis. Philadelphia. London. Toronto: WB Saunders, 1975;16-43
  5. Sperber GH. Anodontia: two cases of different etiology. Oral surg oral medicine and oral pathology. 1963;16: 73-82
  6. Goose DH. Preliminary study of tooth size in families. J Dent Res. 1967; 46: 959-62
  7. Lewis DW, Grainger RM. Sex-linked inheritance of tooth size, a family study. Arch Oral Biol. 1967; 12: 539-44
  8. Muller TP, Hıll IN, Peterson AC, Blayney JR. A survey of congenitally missing permanent teeth. J Am Dent Assoc. 1970; 81: 101-7
  9. Endo T, Ozoe R, Kubota M, Akiyama M, Shimooka S. A survey of hypodontia in Japanese orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod. Dentofac Orthop. 2006; 129: 29-35
  10. Endo T, Yoshino S, Ozoe R, Kojima K, Shimooka S. Association of advanced hypodontia and craniofacial morphology in Japanese orthodontic patients. Odontology. 2004; 92(1): 48-53
  11. Ben-Bassat Y, Brin I. Skeletal and dental patterns in patients with severe congenital absence of teeth. Am J Orthod. Dentofac Orthop. 2009; 135: 349-56
  12. Endo T, Ozoe R, Kojima K, Shimooka S. Congenitally missing mandibular incisors and mandibular symphysis morphology. Angle Orthod. 2007; 77: 1079-84
  13. Park JH, Okadakage S, Sato Y, Akamatsu Y, Tai K. orthodontic treatment of a congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisor. J Esthetic Restor Dent. 2010; 22: 297-313
  14. Nissan J, Mardinger O, Strauss M, Peleg M, Sacco R, Chaushu G. Implant-supported restoration of congenitally missing teeth using cancellous bone blockallografts. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011; 111: 286-291
  15. Hallman M. A prospective study of treatment of severely resorbed maxillae with narrow nonsubmerged implants: results after 1 year of loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001;16(5): 731-6
  16. Weng D, Jacobson Z, Tarnow D, Hurzeler MB, Faehn O, Sanavi F, et al. A prospective multicenter clinical trial of 3i machined-surface implants: results after 6 years of follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003; 18(3): 417-23
  17. Fritz U, Diedrich