Journals / Gülhane Tıp Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 4

Childhood invaginations

Çocukluk çağı invajinasyonları

Pages
236–239
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Full success in treatment can be achieved by early diagnosis and fulltime availability of radiologic support.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Childhood invaginations Invagination is the second most common acute abdomen pathology after appendicitis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In our study, 20 cases treated because of invagination between February 2000 and May 2007 were analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Full success in treatment can be achieved by early diagnosis and fulltime availability of radiologic support.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Kusma · İnvajinasyon · Tanı

Abstract

Childhood invaginations Invagination is the second most common acute abdomen pathology after appendicitis. It is defined as telescopic insertion of terminal ileum to colon after cecum and colon. In our study, 20 cases treated because of invagination between February 2000 and May 2007 were analyzed. Age, gender, complaints, admission time, diagnostic and surgical methods administered, postoperative complications and types of invagination were evaluated in the patients. Of all the patients, 15 were male and 5 were female. Age distribution of the patients was between 2 to 97 months. Major complaints were abdominal pain, bilious vomiting and rectal bleeding. A palpable abdominal mass was detected on physical examination in 7 cases (35%). Twelve patients (60%) were treated by barium enema under fluoroscopy whereas 8 (40%) were treated with surgery. Among the 8 patients operated, Meckel's diverticulum was detected as the cause of invagination in only one patient (12.5%). Ileus developed in 2 patients treated surgically because of intraabdominal adhesions complicating in the long-term. No morbidity or mortality was noted in any of the patients. While invagination is a disease that can be treated by minimally invasive methods when diagnosed early, complications such as intestinal resection or sepsis may develop in cases diagnosed late. Full success in treatment can be achieved by early diagnosis and fulltime availability of radiologic support.

Özet

İnvajinasyon çocukluk çağında akut karın nedenlerinde apandisitten sonra ikinci sıklıkta gelir. Patoloji, terminal ileumun çekum ve sonrasında kolona doğru teleskopik olarak iç içe girmesi olarak tanımlanır. Çalışmamızda, kliniğimizde Şubat 2000 ile Mayıs 2007 tarihleri arasında invajinasyon nedeni ile tedavi edilen 20 olgu değerlendirilmiştir. Hastalarda yaş, cinsiyet, başvuru şikayetleri, başvuru zamanı, tanı ve cerrahi yöntemleri, postoperatif komplikasyonlar ve invajinasyon tipleri değerlendirildi. Hastaların 15'i erkek, 5'i kız idi. Yaş dağılımları 2 ile 97 ay arasındaydı. Hastaların başlıca yakınmaları karın ağrısı, safralı kusma ve rektal kanama olarak bulundu. Fizik muayenede 7 olguda (%35) karında kitle palpe edildi. On iki olguda (%60) floroskopi eşliğinde baryum enema ile hidrostatik redüksiyon sağlanırken, 8 olgu (%40) cerrahi yöntemle tedavi edildi. Opere edilen 8 hastanın sadece birinde (%12.5) invajinasyona neden olan Meckel divertikülü saptandı. Opere olan 2 hastada geç dönemde karın içi yapışıklıklara bağlı ileus gelişti. Hastaların hiçbirisinde mortalite veya morbidite görülmedi. Invajinasyon erken tanı konduğunda minimal invaziv yöntemler ile tedavi edilebilecek bir hastalık iken, geç tanı konan olgularda bağırsak rezeksiyonu ve sepsis gibi komplikasyonlar gelişebilir. Tedavide başarı erken tanı ve tam gün radyolojik destek ile elde edilebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇALIŞKAN, M. B., GÜVEN, A., ATABEK, C., DEMİRBAĞ, S., SÜRER, İ., ÖZTÜRK, H. (2007). Childhood invaginations. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 4, 236–239. https://ajindex.com/articles/226209

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Aschcraft K. Intussusception. In: Aschcraft K, Holter T (eds). Pediatric Surgery. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 1993: 416-419
  2. Young D. Intussusception. In: O'Neil JA, Rowe MI, Grosfeld JL (eds). Pediatric Surgery. St. Louis: MosbyYear Book Inc, 1998: 1185-1198
  3. Ein SH, Alton D, Palder SB, Shandling B, Stringer D. Intussusception in the 1990s: has 25 years made a difference? Pediatr Surg Int 1997; 12: 374-376
  4. Ong NT, Beasley SW. The leadpoint in intussusception. J Pediatr Surg 1990; 25: 640-643
  5. Byrne AT, Geoghegan T, Govender P, Lyburn ID, Colhoun E, Torreggiani WC. The imaging of intussusception. Clin Radiol 2005; 60: 39-46
  6. Munden MM, Bruzzi JF, Coley BD, Munden RF. Sonography of pediatric small-bowel intussusception: differentiating surgical from nonsurgical cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188: 275-279
  7. Yang CM, Hsu HY, Tsao PN, Chang MH, Lin FY. Recurrence of intussusception in childhood. Acta Paediatr Taiwan 2001; 42: 158-161
  8. Crankson SJ, Al-Rabeeah AA, Fischer JD, Al-Jadaan SA, Namshan MA. Idiopathic intussusception in infancy and childhood. Saudi Med J 2003; 24: 18-20
  9. Kim YS, Rhu JH. Intussusception in infancy and childhood. Analysis of 385 cases. Int Surg 1989; 74: 114-118
  10. Beasley SW. Current radiological management of intussusception. Pediatr Radiol 1993; 23: 78
  11. Tiao MM, Wan YL, Ng SH, et al. Sonographic features of small-bowel intussusception in pediatric patients. Acad Emerg Med 2001; 8: 368-373
  12. Bonadio WA. Intussusception reduced by barium enema. Outcome and short-term follow-up. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1988; 27: 601-604
  13. Ikeda T, Koshinaga T, Inoue M, Goto H, Sugitou K, Hagiwara N. Intussusception in children of school age. Pediatr Int 2007; 49: 58-63
  14. Okuyama H, Nakai H, Okada A. Is barium enema reduction safe and effective in patients with a long duration of intussusception? Pediatr Surg Int 1999; 15: 105-107.