Journals / Gülhane Tıp Dergisi / 2003 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 3

Total abdominal hysterectomy versus extra corporeal abdominal hysterectomy: A randomised prospective study that compares two techniques

Total abdominal histerektomi versus ekstrakorporeal abdominal histerektomi: İki tekniği karşılaştıran randomize çalışma

Pages
267–270
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Due to the above mentioned reasons, we suggest abdominal hysterectomy as a new operation technique.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective : Abdominal hysterectomy is the most frequently practiced type of operation by gynecologists.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods : Between March 1997 and December 2000 due to benign conditions (uterine leiomyoma, abnormal uterine bleeding, intractable bleeding) 126 patients were operated with Richardson's modified intrafacial technique while 112 patients were operated with the extra corporeal abdominal technique.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Due to the above mentioned reasons, we suggest abdominal hysterectomy as a new operation technique.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Histerektomi · Jinekolojik cerrahi prosedürler · Zaman

Abstract

Objective : Abdominal hysterectomy is the most frequently practiced type of operation by gynecologists. The techniques applied for this type of operation are intrafacial, exfrafacial and supracervical technique. In GATA Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the intrafacial technique that Richardson defined and modified is often used. As the new hysterectomy technique we have applied extracorporeal abdominal hysterectomy. The extracorporeal technique provides advantages such as leaving little incision scar, taking less operation time, causing less blood loss, early mobilization and discharge from hospital facilities and better operation visualization. Materials and Methods : Between March 1997 and December 2000 due to benign conditions (uterine leiomyoma, abnormal uterine bleeding, intractable bleeding) 126 patients were operated with Richardson's modified intrafacial technique while 112 patients were operated with the extra corporeal abdominal technique. Current hysterectomy techniques, average operation time, average blood loss, average uterus weight, hospitalization period, temperature and infection were compared in terms of tromboembolic illness. The findings were evaluated with two-tailed student test and chi square test. Results: As a result of extracorporeal abdominal hysterectomy there formed a smaller incision scar (p<0.01). The average operation time was shorter (p<0.01). The average blood loss was less (p<0.01) and hospitalization period was shorter (p<0.01). Furthermore less urinary infection was found (p<0.01). Conclusion: Extracorporeal abdominal hysterectomy provides smaller incision scar, shorter operation time, better operation visualization, and less postoperative complication rate compared to modified Richardson method. Due to the above mentioned reasons, we suggest abdominal hysterectomy as a new operation technique.

Özet

Giriş: Abdominal histerektomi jinekologlar tarafından en sık uygulanan operasyon tipidir. Bu operasyon için, uygulanan teknikler intrafasiyal, ekstrafasiyal ve supraservikal tekniklerdir. GATA Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Kliniğinde sıklıkla, Richardson'un tarif ve modifiye ettiği intrafasiyal teknik kullanılmaktadır. Biz yeni histerektomi tekniği olarak kliniğimizde ekstra-korporeal abdominal histerektomiyi uyguladık. Ekstrakorporeal teknik daha küçük insizyon skarı, daha az operasyon süresi ve kan kaybı, daha erken ambulasyon, daha erken taburcu etme süresi ve daha iyi operasyon vizualizasyonu konusunda avantajlar sağlamaktadır. Metod: Mart 1997 He Aralık 2000 tarihleri arasında benign kondisyonlar sebebiyle (myoma uteri, anormal uterin kanama, intractible kanama) 126 olgu Richardson'ın modifiye intrafasiyal tekniği ile öpere edilirken 112 olgu da ekstrakorporeal abdominal teknik ile öpere edildi. Mevcut histerektomi teknikleri ortalama operasyon süresi, ortalama kan kaybı, ortalama uterus ağırlığı, hospitalizasyon süresi, ateş, enfeksiyon, tromboembolik hastalık açısından karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular two-tailed student testchi square test ile değerlendirildi. Sonuç: Ekstrakorporeal abdominal histerektomi de daha küçük keşi yeri skarı oluştu (p<00.1), ortalama operasyon süresi daha kısa (p<0.01), ortalama kan kaybı daha az (p<0.01), hastanede kalma süresi daha kısa olarak saptandı(p<0.01). Üriner enfeksiyon daha az olarak tesbit edildi (p<0.01). Tartışma: Ekstrakorporeal abdominal histerektomi modifiye Richardson yöntemine göre daha küçük kesi yeri skarı, daha kısa operasyon süresi, daha geniş operasyon vizualizasyonu ve daha az postoperatif komplikasyon oranı sağlamaktadır. Bu nedenlerle ekstrakorporeal abdominal histerektomiyi, yeni abdominal histerektomi tekniği olarak önermekteyiz

🔖

Cite This Article

YENEN, M. C., KÜÇÜK, T., GÖKTOLGA, Ü., CEYHAN, S. T., PABUÇCU, R. (2003). Total abdominal hysterectomy versus extra corporeal abdominal hysterectomy: A randomised prospective study that compares two techniques. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 3, 267–270. https://ajindex.com/articles/225776

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Wilcox, L.S., Konin, L.M., Pokras, R., Strauss, L.T., Xia2, Peterson, H.B.: Hysterectomy in the United States, 1988-1990.Obstet Gynecol, 1994;83:549-555
  2. Graves, E.J.: NationalHospital discharge survey: Anual summary, 1990. Vital and health Statistics, series 13, no112. Hyattsville, Maryland:National center for Health Statistics, 1992
  3. Richorson, E.N.: A simplified technique for abdominal panhysterectomy.Surg. Gynecol Obstet, 1929;48;248-251
  4. Aldridge, A.H., Meredith, R.S.: Complete abdominal hysterectomy.Am.J.OBstet gynecol 1950;59:748-752
  5. Ostrzenski, A.: A new, simplified posterior culdoplasty and vaginal vault suspension during abdominal hysterectomy. Int. J Gynecol Obstet.1995;49:25-34
  6. Edovard, J.: Servy, Robert Kaufmann. Extrra Corporeal Abdominal Hysterectomy series by Robert Finkbeiner. http://finkbeiner.com/ Surgical /TAH.html 7. Dowling, R.A., Coriere, J.r., J.N., Sandler, C.M.: Iatrogenic ureteral injury. J ural 1986;135:912- 915
  7. Goodno, Jr. J.R., Powers, T.W., Haris, V.D.: Ureteral injury in gynecologic surgery: a ten year review in a community hospital.Am J.Obstet Gynecol 1995;172:1817-1822
  8. A.Conde-Agudelo. Intrafascial abdominal hysterectomy: ouycomes and complications of 867 operations.Int. J Gynecol&Obstet 2000;68:233- 239
  9. Moller, C., Kehlet, H., Ottesen, B.S.: Hospitalization and Convalescence after hysterectomy. Open or laporoscopic surgery.Ugeskr Laeger 1999;161:4620-4
  10. Raju, K.S., Auld, B.J.: A randomısed prospective study of laporascopic vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy each with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.Br J. Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;101:1068-71
  11. Kunz- G., Plath, T., Leyendecker, G.: Comparison of laporoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy with abdominal hysterectomy. Technique and results. Geburtshilfe Fravenheilkd 1996;56:453-457
  12. Summitt, Jr. R.L., Stovall, T.G., Steege, J.F., Lipscomb, G.H.: A multicenter randomized comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy in abdominal hysterectomy candidates. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:321-6
  13. Weber, A.M., Lee, J.C.: Use of alternative techniques of hysterectomy in ohio, 1988-1994. N. Engl. J. Med 1996;335:483-9
  14. Parys, B.T., Haylen, B.T., Hutton, J.L. et al.: Urodynamıc evaluatıon of lower urinary tract functıon in relation to total hysterectomy. Aust NZ J. Obstet Gynaecol 1990;30(2):161-5
  15. Parys, B.T., Haylen, B.T., Hutton, J.L. et al.: The effects of simple hysterectom