Journals / Gülhane Tıp Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 3

Sleep architecture in insomnia

İnsomniada uyku örüntüsünün özellikleri

Pages
159–163
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicated that, although the restorations were not sufficient, increased sleep efficiency index and total sleep time and decreased sleep latency were found in the second night recordings.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of the study was to investigate the sleep pattern in insomnia and to reveal the differences between psychophysiological and subjective insomniacs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The results indicated that, although the restorations were not sufficient, increased sleep efficiency index and total sleep time and decreased sleep latency were found in the second night recordings.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:All these findings suggest that polysomnographic examination should be recorded more than two nights, and biological arousal patterns should be investigated in detail.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Uyku · Uykuya giriş ve bakım bozuklukları · Sleep

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate the sleep pattern in insomnia and to reveal the differences between psychophysiological and subjective insomniacs. Fifty chronic insomniacs were evaluated. After completing routine examinations, the subjects spent two consecutive nights in the Sleep Research Center in Gülhane Military Medical Academy. The results indicated that, although the restorations were not sufficient, increased sleep efficiency index and total sleep time and decreased sleep latency were found in the second night recordings. Psychophysiological and subjective insomniacs had no differences in the first night in terms of sleep parameters. Subjective insomniacs showed more restoration in the second night than psychophysiological group. All these findings suggest that polysomnographic examination should be recorded more than two nights, and biological arousal patterns should be investigated in detail.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, insomniakların uyku örüntüsünün ve subjektif insomniaklar ile psikofizyolojik insomniaklar arasındaki farkların ortaya konulması amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmada yer alan hasta grubunu; kronik insomnia tanısı konulan 50 denek oluşturmaktadır. Denekler, GATA Ruh Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları AD Uyku Araştırma Merkezinde üst üste iki gece polisomnografik incelemeye alınmışlardır. Genel olarak insomniaklarda, ikinci gece uyku indeksi ve toplam uyku süresinin arttığı; uyku latansının kısaldığı, dolayısıyla, ikinci gecelerde birinci geceye göre, sağlıklı ölçülerde olmasa da, iyi uyunduğu görülmektedir. Birinci gece polisomnografik incelemede genel olarak, subjektif ile psikofizyolojik grup arasında anlamlı bir fark yoktur. Subjektif insomniada, psikofizyolojik insomnia grubundan daha iyi bir restorasyon dikkati çekmektedir. Bu bilgiler ışığında, biyolojik uyarılmışlık fenomenlerinin daha ayrıntılı incelenmesi ve polisomnografik incelemenin iki geceden fazla olması gerektiği düşünülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

SÜTÇİGİL, L., AYDIN, H., ÖZGEN, F., CÖNGÖLOĞLU, E., YAZIHAN, T. N. (2005). Sleep architecture in insomnia. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 3, 159–163. https://ajindex.com/articles/225609

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, American Psychiatric Association, Fourth Edition, Washington, DC, 1994
  2. American Sleep Disorders Association: International Classification of Sleep Disorders: Diagnostic and Coding Manual, Diagnostic Classification Steering Committee. Thorpy MJ, Rochester MN (eds). American Sleep Disorders Association. Lawrence, Kansas: Allen Press Inc., 1990
  3. Aslan S, Albayrak S, Bakar C, ve ark. Ankara ili Gölbaşı ilçesi uyku bozuldukları alan çalışması
  4. Ulusal Psikiyatri Kongresi, 2003, Antalya. Kongre Özet Kitabı, 573-575
  5. Carskadon MA, Dement WC, Mitler MM. Self-reports versus sleep laboratory findings in 122 drug-free subjects with complaints of chronic insomnia. Am J Psychiatry 1976; 133: 1382-1388
  6. Edinger JD, Fins AI. The distribution and clinical significance of sleep time misperceptions among insomniacs. Sleep 1995;18: 232-239
  7. Vanable PA, Aikens JE, Tadimeti L. Sleep latency and duration estimates among sleep disorder patients: variability as a function of sleep disorder diagnosis, sleep history, and psychological characteristics. Sleep 2000; 23: 71-79
  8. Riedel BW, Lichstein KL. Objective sleep measures and objective sleep satisfaction: how do older adults with insomnia define a good night's sleep? Psychol Aging 1998; 13: 159-163
  9. Salin-Pascual RJ, Roehrs TA, Merlotti LA, Sorick F, Roth T. Long-term study of the sleep of insomnia patients with sleep state misperception and other insomnia patients. Am J Psychiatry 1992; 149: 904-908
  10. Hauri PJ, Wisbey J. Wrist actigraphy in insomnia. Sleep 1992; 15: 293-301
  11. Lichstein KL, Wilson NM, Noe SL, Aguillard RN, Bellur SR. Daytime sleepiness in insomnia: behavioral, biological and subjective indices. Sleep 1994; 17: 693-702
  12. Anderson MW, Zendell SM, Rubinstein ML, Spielman AJ. Daytime alertness in chronic insomnia: diagnostic differences and response to behavioral treatment. Sleep Res 1994; 23: 217
  13. Dorsey MC, Bootzin RR. Subjective and psychophysiologic insomnia: an examina¬ tion of sleep tendency and personality. Biol Psychiatry 1997; 41: 209-216
  14. Halasz P, Terzano M, Parrino L, Bodizs R. The nature of arousal in sleep. J Sleep Res 2004; 13: 1-23
  15. Rechtschaffen A, Kales A. A manual of Standardized Terminology Techniques and Scoring System for Sleep Stages of Human Subjects. Brain Information Service/Brain Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, 1968
  16. Toussaint