SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gülhane Tıp Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 2

Retention principles in implant-supported maxillofacial prostheses

İmplant destekli çene-yüz protezlerinde retansiyon prensipleri

OSMAN CUMHUR SİPAHİ
Pages
119–124
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A literature review about the main concepts and application principles of implant supported maxillofacial prostheses are presented in the present article.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Conventional methods used for the retention of maxillofacial prostheses are far from providing efficient and satisfactory retention.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the last decades, the high success rates of implant supported intraoral prostheses have led to the use of osseointegrated implants to overcome the retention problems of maxillofacial prostheses.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A literature review about the main concepts and application principles of implant supported maxillofacial prostheses are presented in the present article.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Çene-yüz protezleri · Maksillofasiyal yaralanmalar · Dental implantasyon

Abstract

Conventional methods used for the retention of maxillofacial prostheses are far from providing efficient and satisfactory retention. In the last decades, the high success rates of implant supported intraoral prostheses have led to the use of osseointegrated implants to overcome the retention problems of maxillofacial prostheses. A literature review about the main concepts and application principles of implant supported maxillofacial prostheses are presented in the present article.

Özet

Çene-yüz protezlerinin tutuculuğunda kullanılan klasik yöntemler çoğunlukla etkili ve tatminkar bir tutuculuk sağlamaktan uzaktır. Son yıllarda, osseointegre implant destekli ağız içi protezlerinde elde edilen yüksek başarı oranı, çene-yüz protezlerinde sorun olan düşük tutuculuk düzeyinin implant kullanımı ile giderilebileceğini ortaya koymuştur. Bu çalışmada, implant destekli çene-yüz protezleri ile ilgili başlıca kavram ve uygulama prensipleri derleme tarzında sunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

SİPAHİ, O. C. (2006). Retention principles in implant-supported maxillofacial prostheses. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 2, 119–124. https://ajindex.com/articles/225601

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Yazdanie N, Mandersen RD. Prosthetic management and rehabilitation of an extensive intraoral and facial defect. Int J Prosthodont 1989; 2: 550- 554
  2. Ismail JHY, Zaki HS. Osseointegration in maxillofacial prosthetics. Dent Clin North Am 1990; 34:327-341
  3. Adisman IK. Prosthesis serviceability for acquired jaw defects. Dent Clin North Am 1990; 34: 265-283
  4. Yontchev E. Cranial and maxillofacial epithesis treatment of osseointegrated implants: concepts and principles. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 53: 552-554
  5. Beydemir B, Dalkız M. Çene-yüz protezleri. Gülhane Askeri Tıp Akademisi Ayın Kitabı 2000: 7
  6. Aramany MA. Basic principles of obturator design for partially edentulous patients. Part II: design principles. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86: 562-568
  7. Okay DJ, Genden E, Buchbinder D, Urken M. Prosthodontic guidelines for surgical reconstruction of the maxilla: a classification system of defects. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86: 352-363
  8. Polyzois GL, Qilo G. Tensile bond strength of maxillofacial adhesives. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 69: 374-377
  9. Tolman DE, Desjardins RR. Extraoral application of osseointegrated implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991; 49: 33-45
  10. Martin JW, King GE. Framework retention for maxillary obturator prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 51: 669-672
  11. Parel SM, Branemark PI, Tjellstrom A. Osseointegration in maxillofacial prosthetics. Part I: intraoral applications. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 55: 490- 493
  12. Parel SM, Branemark PI, Ohrnell LO, Swensson B. Remote implant anchorage for the rehabilitation of maxillary defects. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86: 377-381
  13. Etienne OM, Taddei CA. Use of barclip attachments to enhance the retention of a maxillofacial prosthetic obturator: a clinical report. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31: 618-621
  14. Mentag PJ, Kosinsky TF. Increased retention of a maxillary obturator prosthesis using osteointegrated intramobile cylinder dental implants: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 60: 411-415
  15. Roumanas ED, Nishimura RD, Davis BK, Beumer J. Clinical evaluation of implants retaining edentulous maxillary obturator prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 77: 184-190
  16. Arcuri MR, La Velle WE, Higuchi KW, Hofman HH. Combined percutaneous- permucosal titanium implants for retention of maxillary prosthesis: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 70: 288-290
  17. Niimi A, Ueda M, Kaneda T. Maxillary obturator supported by osseointegrated implants placed in irradiated bone: report of cases. J Maxillofac Surg 1993;