Journals / Gülhane Tıp Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 3

Periferal kan kök hücre transplantasyonu uygulanan hastalarda destek tedavisinde transplant sonrası +5. günde G-CSF uygulamak avantajlıdır

Applying G-CSF on post-transplant +5th day is advantageous on supportive treatment in patients undergoing peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

Pages
157–162
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study revealed that starting G-CSF on day +5 may fasten the neutrophil engraftment, decrease the number of days with fever and decrease the need for antibiotic therapy in post-transplant period.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The role of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration on day +5 after peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in terms of hematologic engraftment and supportive treatment need has been evaluated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Twenty seven patients were given G-CSF (5 μg/kg/day) from day +5 after the transplantation until the achievement of neutrophil engraftment.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study revealed that starting G-CSF on day +5 may fasten the neutrophil engraftment, decrease the number of days with fever and decrease the need for antibiotic therapy in post-transplant period.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kök hücre nakli · Nakil · otolog

Abstract

The role of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration on day +5 after peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in terms of hematologic engraftment and supportive treatment need has been evaluated. Forty two consecutive patients with solid and hematological malignancies were enrolled in two groups depending on G-CSF administration. Twenty seven patients were given G-CSF (5 &#956;g/kg/day) from day +5 after the transplantation until the achievement of neutrophil engraftment. Post-transplant GCSF was not given to the control arm of 15 patients. A number of at least 2X106 CD34+cells per kilogram collected by cytapheresis were given to all patients. A significant difference was found between the two groups in favor of G-CSF receiving group, in terms of neutrophil engraftment time (10.55±1.21 vs 11.93±2.89 days; p=0.04), number of days with fever (3.33±2.66 vs 5±2.95 days; p=0.03) and number of days requiring antibiotic therapy (7.07±3.46 vs 11.87±3.74 days; p<0.001), whereas no statistically significant differences were noted in terms of hospitalization period (13.30±4.79 and 13.53±2.56 days; p=0.26), platelet engraftment time (12.22±2.79 and 13.40±3.89 days; p=0.26) and erythrocyte transfusion need; however, platelet transfusion need was statistically significant between the groups with and without G-CSF support (1.27±0.96 vs 0.56±0.75, p=0.01). This study revealed that starting G-CSF on day +5 may fasten the neutrophil engraftment, decrease the number of days with fever and decrease the need for antibiotic therapy in post-transplant period.

Özet

Periferik kök hücre naklinden sonra +5. günde granülosit koloni stimüle edici faktör (G-CSF) uygulanmasının hematolojik engraftman ve destek tedavi gereksinimleri açılarından rolü araştırıldı. Solid ve hematolojik maligniteli 42 ardışık hasta G-CSF uygulanmasına göre iki kohort gruba ayrıldı. Yirmi yedi hastaya G-CSF (5 μg/kg/day) nakilden sonraki +5. günden nötrofil engraftmanına kadar verildi. On beş hastadan oluşan kontrol grubuna ise nakil sonrasında GCSF verilmedi. Hastaların hepsine sitaferezle toplanan en az 2X106/kg sayıda CD34+ hücre verildi. Her iki grup arasında, G-CSF alan grup lehine olmak üzere nötrofil engraftman zamanı (10.55±1.21 karşın 11.93±2.89 gün; p=0.04), ateşli gün sayısı (3.33±2.66 karşın 5±2.95 gün; p=0.03) ve antibiyotik tedavisi gerektiren gün sayısı (7.07±3.46 karşın 11.87±3.74 gün; p<0.001) açılarından istatistiksel anlamlı farklılık saptandı; ancak hospitalizasyon süresi (13.30±4.79 ve 13.53±2.56 gün; p=0.26), trombosit engraftman zamanı (12.22±2.79 ve 13.40±3.89 gün; p=0.26) ve eritrosit transfüzyon ihtiyacı bakımından anlamlı farklılık saptanmadı. Trombosit transfüzyon ihtiyacı ise G-CSF desteği yapılan ve yapılmayan gruplar arasında istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı farklı bulundu (1.27±0.96 vs 0.56±0.75, p=0.01). Bu çalışma nakilden sonra +5. günde G-CSF başlanmasının nötrofil engraftmanını hızlandırdığını, ateşli gün sayısını ve antibiyotik ihtiyacını azalttığını göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARPACI, F., BAŞKÖY, K., ATAERGİN, S., ÖZET, A., ÖZTÜRK, M., KUZHAN, O., KÖMÜRCÜ, Ş., ÖZTÜRK, B. (2007). Periferal kan kök hücre transplantasyonu uygulanan hastalarda destek tedavisinde transplant sonrası +5. günde G-CSF uygulamak avantajlıdır. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 3, 157–162. https://ajindex.com/articles/225540

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Beaujean F, Bourhis JH, Bayle C, et al. Successful cryopreservation of purified autologous CD34+ cells: influence of freezing parameters on cell recovery and engraftment.Bone Marrow Transplant 1998; 22: 1091-1096
  2. Colombat P, Delain M, Desbois I, et al. Granulocytemacrophage colony-stimulating factor accelerates hematopoietic recovery after autologous bone marrow or peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation and highdose chemotherapy for lymphoma. Bone Marrow Transplant 1996; 18: 293-299
  3. Gorin NC, Lopez M, Laporte JP, et al. Preparation and successful engraftment of purified CD34+ bone marrow progenitor cells in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.Blood 1995; 85: 1647-1654
  4. Jansen J, Thompson EM, Hanks S, et al. Hematopoietic growth factor after autologous peripheral blood transplantation:comparison of G-CSF and GM-CSF. Bone Marrow Transplant 1999; 23: 1251-1256
  5. McQuaker IG, Hunter AE, Pacey S, Haynes AP, Iqbal A,Russell NH. Low-dose filgrastim significantly enhances neutrophil recovery following autologous peripheralblood stem-cell transplantation in patients with lymphoproliferative disorders: evidence for clinical and economic benefit. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15: 451-457
  6. Spitzer G, Adkins DR, Spencer V, et al. Randomized study of growth factors post-peripheral-blood stem-cell transplant: neutrophil recovery is improved with modest clinical benefit. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12: 661-670
  7. Tricot G, Jagannath S, Vesole D, et al. Peripheral blood stem cell transplants for multiple myeloma: identification of favorable variables for rapid engraftment in 225 patients. Blood 1995; 85: 588-596
  8. Bence-Bruckler I, Bredeson C, Atkins H, et al. A randomized trial of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor(Neupogen) starting day 1 vs day 7 post-autologous stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 1998; 22: 965-969
  9. Bolwell BJ, Pohlman B, Andresen S, et al. Delayed GCSF after autologous progenitor cell transplantation: a prospective randomized trial. Bone Marrow Transplant 1998; 21: 369-373
  10. Faucher C, Le Corroller AG, Chabannon C, et al.Administration of G-CSF can be delayed after transplantation of autologous G-CSF-primed blood stem cells: a randomized study. Bone Marrow Transplant 1996; 17:533-536
  11. Piccirillo N, Sica S, Laurenti L, et al. Optimal timing of G-CSF administration after CD34+ immunoselected peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 1999; 23: 1245-1250
  12. Peters W. Bone marrow trans