Journals / Gülhane Tıp Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 4

Investigation of different dentin bonding agents administered to primary and permanent dentin by scanning electron microscopy

Süt ve sürekli dentin uygulanan farklı dentin bağlayıcı sistemlerin taramalı elektron mikroskobunda incelenmesi

Pages
205–211
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We conclude that different clinical applications may be helpful due to the structural changes of primary teeth.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to compare the adhesive efficacy of different dentin bonding agents on human permanent and primary dentin.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A statistically significant thicker hybrid layer formation was observed in primary dentin when compared to permanent dentin.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We conclude that different clinical applications may be helpful due to the structural changes of primary teeth.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the adhesive efficacy of different dentin bonding agents on human permanent and primary dentin. For this aim, different dentin bonding agents were administered on permanent and primary dentin, and samples prepared for the investigation of the formed hybrid layer and resin tags at the resin-dentin interface were investigated with scanning electron microscopy. While hybrid layer formation was observed with total-etch bonding systems, an obvious gap formation was seen with the self-etch system. A statistically significant thicker hybrid layer formation was observed in primary dentin when compared to permanent dentin. We conclude that different clinical applications may be helpful due to the structural changes of primary teeth.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı farklı dentin bağlayıcı sistemlerin süt ve sürekli insan molar dişi dentinlerindeki bağlanma etkinliklerinin karşılaştırılmasıdır. Bu amaçla süt ve sürekli diş gruplarına farklı dentin bağlayıcı sistemler uygulanmış ve rezin-dentin ara yüzünde oluşan hibrid tabakası ve rezin uzantıların incelenmesi amacıyla hazırlanan örnekler taramalı elektron mikroskobunda incelenmiştir. Yapılan incelemelerde “total-etch” bağlayıcı sistemler ile hibrid tabakası oluşumu gözlenirken, “self-etch” bağlayıcı sistemde belirgin bir boşluk oluşumu olduğu izlenmiştir. Süt dişlerinde sürekli dişlerden istatistiksel olarak daha kalın bir hibrid tabakası oluştuğu gözlenmiştir. Süt dişlerinin yapısal farklılıklarından dolayı farklı klinik uygulamaların yararlı olabileceği düşünülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARABULUT, B., CAN-KARABULUT, D. C., ÖZ, T. F. (2009). Investigation of different dentin bonding agents administered to primary and permanent dentin by scanning electron microscopy. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 4, 205–211. https://ajindex.com/articles/225481

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Van Meerbeek B, Vargas M, Inoue S, et al. Adhesives and cements to promote preservation dentistry. Oper Dent 2001; 6: 119-144
  2. Van Meerbek B, Dhem A, Goret-Nicaise M, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Comparative SEM and TEM examination of the ultrastructure of the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone. J Dent Res 1993; 72: 495-501
  3. Uno S, Finger WJ. Function of the hybrid zone as a stress- absorbing layer in resin-dentin bonding. Quintessence Int 1995; 26: 733-738
  4. Shashikiran ND, Gunda S, Subba Reddy VV. Comparison of resin-dentine interface in primary and permanent teeth for three different durations of dentine etching. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2002; 20: 124-131
  5. Uekusa S, Yamaguchi K, Miyazaki M, Tsubota K, Kurokawa H, Hosoya Y. Bonding efficacy of single-step self-etch systems to sound primary and permanent tooth dentin. Oper Dent 2006; 31: 569-576
  6. Araujo FB, Garcia-Godoy F, Issao M. A comparison of three resin bonding agents to primary tooth dentin. Pediatr Dent 1997; 19: 253-257
  7. Swift EJ. Bonding systems for restorative materials-a comprehensive review. Pediatr Dent 1998; 20: 80-84. 8. el Kalla IH, Garcia-Godoy F. Bond strength and interfacial micromorphology of four adhesive systems in primary and permanent molars. J Dent Child 1998; 65: 169-176
  8. Asakawa T, Manabe A, Itoh K, Inoue M, Hisamitu H, Sasa R. Efficacy of dentin adhesives in primary and permanent teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2001; 25: 231-236
  9. Agostini FG, Kaaden C, Powers JM. Bond strength of self-etching primers to enamel and dentin of primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 2001; 23: 481-486
  10. Sumikawa DA, Marshall GW, Gee L, Marshall SJ. Microstructure of primary tooth dentin. Pediatr Dent 1999; 21: 439-444
  11. Can-Karabulut DC, Öz FT, Karabulut B, Batmaz İ, İlk O. Adhesion to primary and permanent dentin and a simple model approach. Eur J Dent 2009; 3: 32-41
  12. Walshaw PR, Mc Comb D. Clinical considerations for optimal dentinal bonding. Quintessence Int 1996; 27: 619-625
  13. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 1998; 26: 1-20
  14. Burrow MF, Nopnakeepong U, Phrukkanon S. A comparison of microtensile bond strengths of several dentin bonding systems to primary and permanent dentin. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 239-245
  15. Senawongse P, Harnirattisai C, Shimada Y, Tagami J. Effective bond strength of current adhesive systems on deciduous and permanent dentin. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 196-202
  16. Nör JE, Feigal RJ