Journals / Gülhane Tıp Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 2

Retrospective evaluation of the laparoscopic treatment of ectopic pregnancies

Ektopik gebeliklerin laparoskopik yaklaşımla tedavilerinin retrospektif incelenmesi

Pages
99–103
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the treatment of ectopic pregnancies surgical approach was rather preferred than medical therapy in our series, and laparoscopic salpingectomy was the most frequently preferred procedure in cases with tubal damage as also recommended in the current literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to evaluate the ectopic pregnancies treated by laparoscopy in our clinic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Demographic characteristics, risk factors, clinical findings and therapeutic approaches of 182 patients treated with the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy by laparoscopic surgery between June 2003 and September 2010 were retrospectively evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the treatment of ectopic pregnancies surgical approach was rather preferred than medical therapy in our series, and laparoscopic salpingectomy was the most frequently preferred procedure in cases with tubal damage as also recommended in the current literature.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the ectopic pregnancies treated by laparoscopy in our clinic. Demographic characteristics, risk factors, clinical findings and therapeutic approaches of 182 patients treated with the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy by laparoscopic surgery between June 2003 and September 2010 were retrospectively evaluated. The mean age of the patients was 29.3±3.05 years, the mean number of gravidity and parity was 2.3±1.0 and 1.1±0.9, respectively, and the mean gestational age was 6.2±0.8 weeks. The mean β-HCG levels of the patients on admission was 3880±2510 IU/ml. The most common risk factor was the presence of a previous abdominopelvic surgery (14%), the most frequent admission reason was vaginal bleeding with pelvic pain (40%) and the most frequent preoperative ultrasonographic finding was the presence of an adnexial mass (60%). The most frequent locus of ectopic implants was tubal ampulla (83%), and the most commonly performed treatment modality was laparoscopic salpingectomy (56%). In the treatment of ectopic pregnancies surgical approach was rather preferred than medical therapy in our series, and laparoscopic salpingectomy was the most frequently preferred procedure in cases with tubal damage as also recommended in the current literature.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı kiniğimizde laparoskopik cerrahi ile tedavi edilen ektopik gebelik olgularının değerlendirilmesidir. Haziran 2003 ile Eylül 2010 tarihleri arasında ektopik gebelik nedeniyle laparoskopik cerrahi ile tedavi edilmiş olan 182 olgunun demografik özellikleri, risk faktörleri, klinik bulguları ve tedavi yaklaşımları retrospektif olarak incelenmiştir. Hastalarımızın yaş ortalaması 29.3±3.05 yıl olup, gravida ve parite ortalamaları sırasıyla 2.3±1.0 ve 1.1±0.9, ortalama gebelik haftaları ise 6.2±0.8’dir. Hastaların kliniğimize başvuruları sırasındaki ortalama serum β-HCG düzeyleri 3880±2510 IU/ml’dir. En sık saptanan risk faktörü %14 abdominopelvik cerrahi öykü, en sık kliniğe başvuru şikayeti %40 pelvik ağrı ile birlikte görülen vajinal kanama ve en sık preoperatif ultrasonografi bulgusu %60 adneksiyal kitle varlığıdır. Ektopik gebeliklerin en sık yerleşim yeri tubal ampulla (%75) olarak kaydedilmiş ve en sık uygulanan cerrahi tedavi yaklaşımı ise laparoskopik salpenjektomi (%56) olmuştur. Ektopik gebeliklerin tedavisinde cerrahi yaklaşım medikal tedaviye göre daha öncelikli tercihimiz olup, özellikle tubal hasar gelişmiş olgularda önerilen cerrahi girişim olan laparoskopik salpenjektomi en sık uyguladığımız prosedür olmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERCAN, C. M., KESKİN, U., ÇOKSÜER, H., KARAŞAHİN, K. E., ALANBAY, İ., DEDE, M., BAŞER, İ. (2011). Retrospective evaluation of the laparoscopic treatment of ectopic pregnancies. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 2, 99–103. https://ajindex.com/articles/225393

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Atasü T, Sahmay S. Jinekoloji. 2nci baskı. İstanbul: Nobel Yayınevi, 2001: 547-557
  2. Duran B, Çetin M, Timuroğlu Y, Demirköprülü N, Timuroğlu T. Ektopik gebelik olgularının β-hCG düzeylerinin ve mevsimlere göre dağılımının değerlendirilmesi. C. Ü. Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2003; 25: 193-196
  3. Cagnacci A, Landi S, Volpe A. Rhythmic variation in the rate of ectopic pregnancy throughout the year. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180: 1067-1071
  4. Kirk E, Condous G, Bourne T. Ectopic pregnancy deaths: what should we be doing? Hosp Med 2004; 65: 657-660
  5. Stovall TG, Ling FW. Single dose methotrexate: an expanded clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168: 1759-1765
  6. Kirk E, Condous G, Bourne T. The nonsurgical management of ectopic pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 91-100
  7. Musa J, Daru PH, Mutihir JT, Ujah IA. Ectopic pregnancy in Jos Northern Nigeria: prevalence and impact on subsequent fertility. Niger J Med 2009; 18: 35-38
  8. Storeide O, Veholmen M, Eide M, Bergsjø P, Sandvei R. The incidence of ectopic pregnancy in Hordaland County, Norway 1976-1993. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997; 76: 345-349
  9. Bouyer J, Coste J, Shojaei T, et al. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: A comprehensive analysis based on a large case-control, population-based study in France. Am J Epidemiol 2003; 157: 185-194
  10. Alsuleiman SA, Grimes EM. Ectopic pregnancy: a review of 147 cases. J Reprod Med 1982; 27: 101-106
  11. Turhan NÖ, İnegöl İ, Seçkin NC. A three-year audit of the management of ectopic pregnancy. J Turkish German Gynecol Assoc 2004; 5: 310-313
  12. Şahin HG, Zeteroğlu Ş. Sürücü R, Sucaklı MH, Kamacı M. Ektopik gebeliklerde risk faktörleri ve tanı yöntemlerinin değerlendirilmesi. Medical Network Klinik Bilimler ve Doktor 2004; 10: 696-700
  13. Tancer ML, Delke I, Veridiano NP. A fifteen year experience with ectopic pregnancy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1981; 152: 179-182
  14. Job-Spira N, Coste J, Aublet-Cuvelier B, et al. Incidence of extra-uterine pregnancy and characteristics of treated patients. First results of the auvergne registry. Presse Med 1995; 24: 351-355
  15. Randic L, Haller H. Ectopic pregnancy among past IUD users. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1992; 38: 299-304
  16. Doyle MB, DeCherney AH, Diamond MP. Epidemiology and etiology of ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1991; 18: 1-17
  17. Pradhan P, Thapamagar SB, Maskey S. A profile of ectopic pregnancy at Nepal medical college teaching hospital. Nepal Med Coll J 2006; 8: 238-242. 18.