Journals / Gülhane Tıp Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 2

Robotic Hysterectomy: First Experience Within University Hospitals in Turkey

Robotik histerektomi: Türkiye’de üniversite hastanelerindeki ilk deneyim

Pages
141–145
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

With the expansion of robotic hysterectomy experience, operation time and morbidity of the patients are expected to decrease and the overall comfort of the patients would be increased.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Thanks to the rapid advances in methods of endoscopic surgery, minimally invasive methods are gradually replacing conventional techniques in gynecologic surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Myoma uteri was diagnosed in a 48 years old woman with a history of pelvic pain and intermittent bleeding, and she has been scheduled for robotic hysterectomy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:With the expansion of robotic hysterectomy experience, operation time and morbidity of the patients are expected to decrease and the overall comfort of the patients would be increased.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Thanks to the rapid advances in methods of endoscopic surgery, minimally invasive methods are gradually replacing conventional techniques in gynecologic surgery. Robotic surgery methods are the most recent point of the minimally invasive methods. Robotic hysterectomy is the most common example in which minimally invasive gynecological surgery procedures. In this case, we would like to present the first robotic hysterectomy case within university hospitals in Turkey. Myoma uteri was diagnosed in a 48 years old woman with a history of pelvic pain and intermittent bleeding, and she has been scheduled for robotic hysterectomy. Informed consent had been taken before the operation. The robotic hysterectomy was performed using Da Vinci robotic system. The robotic hysterectomy operation started with the central docking technique under general anesthesia. The docking time was 34 minutes, total operation time was 148 minutes. Estimated intraoperative blood loss was 40 ml and the uterus weiged 350 grams. There were no intraoperative complication. The patient was discharged on the postoperative second day. In university hospitals, the robotic procedures are important for application of the advanced endoscopic methods and for assistant training. With the expansion of robotic hysterectomy experience, operation time and morbidity of the patients are expected to decrease and the overall comfort of the patients would be increased. The aim of this case report was to share the first robotic hysterectomy experience within university hospitals in Turkey.

Özet

Endoskopik cerrahi yöntemlerdeki hızlı gelişmeler sayesinde, jinekolojik cerrahi uygulamalardaki konvansiyonel yöntemlerin yerini, minimal invaziv yöntemler almaktadır. Robotik cerrahi yöntemler, minimal invaziv yöntemlerdeki en son noktadır. Robotik histerektomi, minimal invaziv jinekolojik cerrahi prosedürlere en sık örnektir. Biz bu olguda, Türkiyede üniversite hastaneleri arasındaki ilk robotik histerektomi uygulamasını sunmayı amaçlıyoruz. 48 yaşında, pelvik ağrı ve ara kanama öyküsü ile başvuran hastaya myoma uteri tespit edilmiş ve hastaya robotik histerektomi planlanmıştır. Operasyon öncesi dönemde hasta onamı alındı. Robotik histerektomi, Da Vinci robotik sistem kullanılarak uygulandı. Robotik histerektomi operasyonu, genel anestezi altında santral yerleştirme işlemi ile başladı. Yerleştirme süresi 34 dakika, toplam operasyon süresi ise 148 dakika idi. Tahmini intraoperatif kan kaybı 40ml ve uterus ağırlığı 350 gram idi. İntraoperatif komplikasyon gelişmedi. Hasta postoperatif 2 inci günde taburcu edildi. Üniversite hastanelerinde, robotik prosedürler, ileri endoskopik yöntemlerin uygulanması ve asistan eğitimi açısından önemlidir. Robotik histerektomi deneyiminin artması ile operasyon süresi ve hasta morbiditesinin azalması umulmaktadır ve genel hasta konforunda artış olacaktır. Bu olgu sunumunun amacı, Türkiyede üniversite hastaneleri arasındaki ilk robotik histerektomi deneyimimizi paylaşmaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEDE, M., YENEN, M. C., KESKİN, U., ALANBAY, İ., ÖZKAN, Ö. (2013). Robotic Hysterectomy: First Experience Within University Hospitals in Turkey. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 2, 141–145. https://ajindex.com/articles/225330

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Kwoh YS, Hou J, Jonckheere EA, Hayati S. A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1988; 35:153-160
  2. Davies BL, Hibberd RD, Coptcoat MJ, Wickham JE. A surgeon robot prostatectomy - a laboratory evaluation. J Med Eng Technol 1989; 13: 273-277
  3. Bauer A, Borner M, Lahmer A. Clinical experience with a medical robotic system for total hip replacement. In: Nolte LP, Ganz R (eds). Computer Assisted Orthopedic surgery. Bern: Hogrefe & Huber; 1999: 128-133
  4. Stylopoulos N, Rattner D. Robotics and ergonomics. Surg Clin North Am 2003; 83: 1321-1337
  5. Advincula AP, Song A. The role of robotic surgery in gynecology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2007; 19(4):331- 336. Review. PubMed PMID: 17625414
  6. Diaz-Arrastia C, Jurnalov C, Gomez G, Townsend C Jr. Laparoscopic hysterectomy using a computer- enhanced surgical robot. Surg Endosc 2002; 16: 1271- 1273
  7. Göçmen A, Sanlikan F, Uçar MG. Turkey’s experience of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: A series of 25 consecutive cases. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2010; 282(2): 163-171. Epub 2009 Oct 17. PubMed PMID: 19838722
  8. Payne TN, Dauterive FR. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008; 15: 286-291
  9. Ascher-Walsh CJ, Capes TL. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy is an improvement over laparotomy in women with a limited number of myomas. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010; 17: 306-310
  10. Nezhat C, Lavie O, Hsu S, Watson J, Barnett O, Lemyre M. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy compared with standard laparoscopic myomectomy: Aretrospective matched control study. Fertil Steril 2009; 91: 556-559
  11. Cho JE, Shamshirsaz AH, Nezhat C, Nezhat C, Nezhat F. New technologies for reproductive medicine: Laparoscopy, endoscopy, robotic surgery and gynecology. A review of the literature. Minerva Ginecol 2010; 62: 137-167
  12. Nezhat C, Lewis M, Kotikela S, Veeraswamy A, Saadat L, Hajhosseini B, Nezhat C. Robotic versus standard laparoscopy for the treatment of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 2010; 94:2758-2760
  13. Beste TM, Nelson KH, Daucher JA. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy utilizing a robotic surgical system. JSLS 2005; 9:13-15
  14. Fiorentino RP, Zepede MA, Golldstein BH, John CR, Rettenmaier MA. Pilot study assessing robotic laparoscopic hysterectomy and patient outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecology 2006; 13 (1): 60-63. 15