Journals / Gülhane Tıp Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 2

Definition of pharyngeal airway, tongue dimensions and hyoid position in healthy subjects

Sağlıklı bireylerde farengeal hava yolu, dil boyutlarının ve hyoid pozisyonun belirlenmesi

Pages
117–122
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Cephalometric measurments of healthy male individuals showed statistically greater values in all sagittal pharyngeal structural dimensions when compared with healthy female subjects, with the exception of the craniocervical angulations related to head posture.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purposes of this study were to establish the normative data for the upper airway dimensions and tongue size; hyoid position and to evaluate the cervico-craniofacial skeletal morphology of the anatomical differences between sexes in healthy subjects.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The upper airways of 50 male and 53 female healthy volunteers were retrospectively evaluated by lateral skull radiographs.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Cephalometric measurments of healthy male individuals showed statistically greater values in all sagittal pharyngeal structural dimensions when compared with healthy female subjects, with the exception of the craniocervical angulations related to head posture.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to establish the normative data for the upper airway dimensions and tongue size; hyoid position and to evaluate the cervico-craniofacial skeletal morphology of the anatomical differences between sexes in healthy subjects. The upper airways of 50 male and 53 female healthy volunteers were retrospectively evaluated by lateral skull radiographs. Anatomical pharyngeal linear measurements and craniocervical postural relationships were analyzed. To set-up the reference values for cervico-craniofacial skeletal morphology of the healthy subjects, the craniovertical, craniocervical, cervicohorizontal postural relationships and the curvature of the cervical column were also analyzed. Cephalometric measurments of healthy male individuals showed statistically greater values in all sagittal pharyngeal structural dimensions when compared with healthy female subjects, with the exception of the craniocervical angulations related to head posture.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amaçları sağlıklı bireylerde üst solunum yolu, dil boyutları ve hyoid posizyonu hakkında standart dataları belirlemek ve sağlıklı bireylerde cinsiyetler arasında boyun-kafa yüz iskeletsel yapıdaki anatomik farklılıkları ortaya çıkarmaktı. Sağlıklı 50 erkek ve 53 kadın gönüllünün yan kafa radyografileri incelendi. Anatomik farengeal ölçümleri ve boyun-kafa postür ilişkileri analiz edildi. Sağlıklı bireylerin boyun-kafa yüz iskeletsel yapı referans değerleri belirlemek için dikey, yatay ve servikal kafa postür ilişkileri ile servikal kolon kavisleri de analiz edildi. Sağlıklı erkek bireylerin sefalometrik ölçümleri, kadın bireylerle karşılaştırıldığında; kafa postürü ile ilişkili olan kafa-servikal açıları haricindeki tüm sagital yöndeki farengeal yapısal mesafelerde istatistiksel olarak büyük bulundu.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKÇE, S. M., GÖRGÜLÜ, S., GÖKÇE, H. S., BENGİ, A. O., SAĞDIÇ, D. (2013). Definition of pharyngeal airway, tongue dimensions and hyoid position in healthy subjects. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 2, 117–122. https://ajindex.com/articles/225328

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Popovic RM, White DP. Upper airway muscle activity in normal women: Influence of hormonal status. J Appl Physiol 1998; 84: 1055-1062
  2. Schwab RJ. Sex differences and sleep apnoea. Thorax. 1999; 54: 284-285
  3. Daniel MM, Lorenzi MC, Leite C da C, Lorenzi-Filho G. Pharyngeal dimensions in healthy men and women. Clinics 2007; 62(1): 5-10
  4. Gross JB, Bachenberg KL, Benumof JL, Caplan RA, Connis RT, Cote CJ, Nickinovich DG, Prachand V, Ward DS, Weaver EM, Ydens L, Yu S: Practice guidelines for the perioperative management of patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Anesthesiology 2006; 104: 1081-1093
  5. Kheterpal S, Han R, Tremper KK, Shanks A, Tait AR, O’Reilly M, Ludwig TA. Incidence and predictors of difficult and impossible mask ventilation. Anesthesiology 2006; 105: 885-891
  6. Langeron O, Masso E, Huraux C, Guggiari M, Bianchi A, Coriat P, Riou B. Prediction of difficult mask ventilation. Anesthesiology 2000; 92: 1229-1236
  7. Schwab RJ, Gupta KB, Gefter WB, Metzger LJ, Hoffman EA, Pack AI. Upper airway and soft tissue anatomy in normal subjects and patients with sleep-disordered breathing. Significance of the lateral pharyngeal walls. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995; 152(5 Pt 1):1673-1689
  8. Fidan F, Ünlü M, Sezer M, Pala E, Geçici Ö. Obstrüktif uyku apne sendromu ile anksiyete ve depresyon arasındaki ilişki. Toraks Dergisi. 2006; 7(2): 125-129
  9. Dündar A, Gerek M, Akçam T, Papuşçu Y. Obstrüktif uyku apneli hastalarda üst hava yolu boyutlarının bilgisayarlı tomografi ile değerlendirilmesi. Kulak Burun Boğaz ve Baş Boyun Cerrahisi Dergisi 1998; 6(3): 134-138
  10. Siersbæk-Nielsen S, Solow B. Intra- and interexaminer variability in head posture recorded by dental auxiliaries. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1982; 82: 50-57
  11. Kurtulmuş H, Çötert S, Tuncer AV. Obstrüktif uyku apnesinin tanısında lateral sefalometrik yaklaşım ve mandibular ilerletici splint ile tedavisi. EÜ Dişhek Fak Derg 2007; 28: 113-122
  12. Newman AB, Foster G, Givelber R, Nieto FJ, Redline S, Young T. Progression and regression of sleep-disordered breathing with changes in weight: The Sleep Heart Health Study. Arch Intern Med 2005; 165: 2408-2413
  13. Tsai HH, Ho CY, Lee PL, Tan CT. Cephalometric Analysis of nonobese snorers either with or without obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Angle Orthod 2007; 77(6): 1054-1061
  14. Johal A, Battagel JM. Current principles in the management of obstructive sleep apnea with mandibular advancement appliances. Br Dent 2001; 190: 532-536. 15.