Journals / Gülhane Tıp Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 7

The reference ranges of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in different age groups

Farklı yaş gruplarında nötrofil/lenfosit oranı referans aralıkları

Pages
414–418
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, the data obtained from this study may be helpful to clinicians to interpretation of complete blood test is considered.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The reference ranges of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in different age groupsNeutrophil-lymphocyte ratio is usually considered as an indicator of sub-clinical inflammation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients' records were achieved with the help of Hospital Information System for a year, and 71.897 measurement results which have erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels within the normal range were included the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, the data obtained from this study may be helpful to clinicians to interpretation of complete blood test is considered.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The reference ranges of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in different age groupsNeutrophil-lymphocyte ratio is usually considered as an indicator of sub-clinical inflammation. In the recent studies it is observed that neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio can be used to calculate the morbidity and mortality. In this study we aimed to describe the reference values of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in different age groups. Patients' records were achieved with the help of Hospital Information System for a year, and 71.897 measurement results which have erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels within the normal range were included the study. Patients were classified under 11 groups (0-1, 1-2, 2-5, 5-10 age and the rest as decades) according to the age range. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio values were calculated by dividing the neutrophil count to lymphocyte count parameter from complete blood count test results. It is found that there were statistically significant differences in eight groups of 11 among the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio values when male and female patients' results compared. In conclusion, the data obtained from this study may be helpful to clinicians to interpretation of complete blood test is considered.

Özet

Nötrofil lenfosit oranı genellikle sub-klinik inflamasyonun göstergesi olarak kabul edilmektedir. Son zamanlarda yapılan çalışmalarda nötrofil lenfosit oranının morbidite ve mortalitenin hesaplanmasında kullanılabileceği yönünde bulgulara ulaşılmıştır. Bu çalışmada farklı yaş gruplarında nötrofil lenfosit oranının referans değerlerinin tanımlanması amaçlanmıştır. Hastaların bir yıllık kayıtlarına Hastane Bilgi Sistemi yardımıyla ulaşıldı, eritrosit sedimantasyon hızı ve C-reaktif protein (CRP) değerleri normal sınırlarda olan 71.897 ölçüm sonucu çalışmaya dâhil edildi. Hastalar yaş aralıklarına göre 11 grup altında (0-1, 1-2, 2-5, 5-10 yaş ve kalan kısmı dekadlar şeklinde) sınıflandırıldı. Tam kan test sonuçlarından nötrofil sayısı, lenfosit sayısı parametresine oranlanarak nötrofil lenfosit oranı değerleri hesaplandı. Kadın ve erkek hasta sonuçları karşılaştırıldığında, 11 grubun sekiz tanesinde nötrofil lenfosit oranı değerleri arasındaki farklılığın istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olduğu tespit edildi. Sonuç olarak, bu çalışmada elde edilen verilerin tam kan testinin yorumlanmasında klinisyenlere yardımcı olacağı değerlendirilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDIN, İ., AĞILLI, M., AYDIN, F. N., KURT, Y. G., ÇAYCI, T., TAŞ, A., HONCA, T., ÖZGÜRTAŞ, T., TÜRKER, T., KOÇAK, N. (2015). The reference ranges of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in different age groups. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 7, 414–418. https://ajindex.com/articles/225292

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Litman G, Cannon J, Dishaw L. Reconstructing immune phylogeny: new perpectives. Nat Rev Immunol 2005; 5(11): 866-879 2. May R, Machesky L. Phagocytosis and the actin cytoskeleton. J Cell Sci 2001; 114: 1061-1077 3. Salzet M, Tasiemski A, Cooper E. Innate immunity in lophotrochozoans: the annelids. Curr Pharm Des 2006; 12(24): 3043-3050 4. Zen K, Parkos C. Leucocyte-epithelial interactions. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2003; 15: 557-564 5. Langermans J, Hazenbos W, van Furth R. Antimicrobial 6. Pancer Z, Cooper M. The evolution of adaptive immunity. Annu Rev Immunol 2006; 24: 497-518 7. Holtmeier W, Kabelitz D. Gammadelta T cells link innate and adaptive immune responses. Chem Immunol Allergy 2005; 86: 151-183 8. Harty J, Tvinnereim A, White D. CD8+ T cell effector mechanism in resistance to infection. Annu Rev Immunol 2000; 18: 275-308 9. Jilma B, Blann A, Pernerstorfer T, et al. Regulation of adhesion molecules during human endotoxemia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med1999; 159: 857-863 10. Dionigi R, Dominioni L, Benevento A, et al. Effects of surgical trauma of laparoscopic vs. open cholecystectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 1994; 41: 471-476 11. O'Mahony JB, Palder SB, Wood JJ, et al. Depression of cellular immunity after multiple trauma in the absence of sepsis. J Trauma 1984; 24: 869-875 12. Zahorec R. Ratio of neutrophil to lymphocyte countsRapid and simple parameter of systemic inflammation and stress in critically ill. Bratisl Lek Listy 2001; 102: 5-14 13. Duffy BK, Gurm HS, Rajagopal V, et al. Usefulness of an elevated neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in predicting long-term mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2006; 97: 993-996 14. Tsujimura A, Kawamura N, Ichimura T, et al. Telomerase activity in needle biopsied uterine myoma-like tumors: differential diagnosis between uterine sarcomas and leiomyomas. Int J Oncol 2002; 20: 361-365 15. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standarts: How to define and determine reference intervals in the clinical laboratory: approved guideline, NCCLS document C28-A2 (ISBN 1-56238-406-6)
  2. Wayne, Pann. USA 2000 16. International Federation of ClinicalChemistry, Expert Panel on Theory of Reference Values. Approved recommendation on the theory of referencevalues. Part 1. The concept of reference values. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1987; 25: 337-342 17. Masferrer MF, Arderiu XF, Ane RP. Indirect reference limits estimated from patients results by three mathematical procedures. Clin Chim Acta 1999; 279: 97-