Journals / Gülhane Tıp Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 4

Knowledge and attitude relating to exercise prescription of family medicine research assistant and specialist physicians who are working in Ankara

Pages
152–156
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Also, considering the quality of contents; patients’ expectations and maladaptation problems should be examined in detail and new practicable guidelines should be developed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims:Depending on the principle “exercise is medicine”, physicians are encouraged to prescribe exercise for treating chronic diseases.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods:145 research assistant and specialist physicians of Family Medicine branch in Ankara participated in our descriptive cross-sectional study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Also, considering the quality of contents; patients’ expectations and maladaptation problems should be examined in detail and new practicable guidelines should be developed.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Aims:Depending on the principle “exercise is medicine”, physicians are encouraged to prescribe exercise for treating chronic diseases. In this study, we aimed to evaluate Family Physicians’ exercise prescription (EP) knowledge and practice level, as well as the patient feedback through their perspective. Methods:145 research assistant and specialist physicians of Family Medicine branch in Ankara participated in our descriptive cross-sectional study. They answered a self-produced questionnaire that consisted of 6 sections and 15 questions; mainly presenting their approach. Results:There was statistically significant difference between participants’ EP frequency and learning EP at medical faculty and Family Medicine specialty training (Z=-2,25 p=0.024, and Z=-3,67 p<0.001, respectively); whereas learning at medical congresses or courses had no such effect. There was statistically significant difference between physicians’ thought of necessity and implementation regarding EP (p<0.001). A high percentage of participants (n=102, 70.3%) pointed out that the patients behave and comment as their expectations are not met when they prescribe only or primarily exercise; 127 (80.6%) remarked that patients have difficulty in adapting to EP. Many require a new guideline that is more appropriate for the lifestyle and abilities of the people in this nation and easily-applicable in primary health care centres (n=60, 41.4%). There was statistically significant correlation between the participants’ own exercising and prescribing exercise frequencies (r=0.169, p=0.042). Conclusions:The curriculum of medical faculties should include standardized EP lessons. Also, considering the quality of contents; patients’ expectations and maladaptation problems should be examined in detail and new practicable guidelines should be developed.

🔖

Cite This Article

AĞADAYI, E., KARASİMAV, Ö., ŞENCAN, İ., AĞADAYI, S., KASIM, İ., KAHVECİ, R., ÖZKARA, A. (2019). Knowledge and attitude relating to exercise prescription of family medicine research assistant and specialist physicians who are working in Ankara. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 4, 152–156. https://ajindex.com/articles/225249

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. World Health organization (WHO). (2009) Global Health Risks - Mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks [Online]. Available from:
  2. Fentem PH. ABC of sports medicine. Benefits of exercise in health and disease. BMJ. 1994;308(6939):1291- 1295
  3. Beaulac J, Carlson A, Boyd RJ. Counseling on physical activity to promote mental health: Practical guidelines for family physicians. Can Fam Physician. 2011;57(4):399- 401
  4. Alsairafi M, Alshamali K, Al-rashed A. Effect of physical activity on controlling blood pressure among hypertensive patients from Mishref area of Kuwait. Eur J Gen Med 2010;7(4):377-384
  5. Sönmez B, Aksoy H, Öztürk Ö, Öztürk Z, Kasım İ, Özkara A. The effects of diet and exercise on HbA1c levels in patients with type 2 diabetes under oral antidiabetic treatment. Konuralp Tıp Dergisi. 2015;7(2):93-98
  6. Yeşil P, Altıok M. The importance of physical activity in the prevention and control of cardiovascular diseases. Turk J Card Nur. 2012;3(3):39-48
  7. Groot C, Hooghiemstra AM, Raijmakers PG, et al. The effect of physical activity on cognitive function in patients with dementia: A meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Ageing Res Rev. 2016;25:13-23
  8. Thornton JS, Frémont P, Khan K, et al. Physical activity prescription: a critical opportunity to address a modifiable risk factor for the prevention and management of chronic disease: a position statement by the Canadian Academy of Sport and Exercise Medicine. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(18):1109-1114
  9. Naci H, Ioannidis JP. Comparative effectiveness of exercise and drug interventions on mortality outcomes: metaepidemiological study. BMJ. 2013;347:f5577
  10. Janssen I. Health care costs of physical inactivity in Canadian adults. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2012;37(4):803-806
  11. Anokye NK, Lord J, Fox-Rushby J. Is brief advice in primary care a cost-effective way to promote physical activity? Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(3):202-206
  12. Weidinger KA, Lovegreen SL, Elliott MB, et al. How to make exercise counseling more effective: lessons from rural America. J Fam Pract. 2008;57(6):394-402
  13. Orrow G, Kinmonth AL, Sanderson S, Sutton S. Effectiveness of physical activity promotion based in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2012;344:e1389
  14. Buffart LM, van der Ploeg HP, Smith BJ, Kurko J, King L, Bauman AE. General practitioners’ perceptions and practices of physical activity