Journals / Gülhane Tıp Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 1

Aesthetic restoration of peg lateral incisors with direct composite resin

Pages
25–27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this case report we have presented 3 patients presenting with “conical tooth anomaly” following the clinical and radiographical evaluation and diagnosis of those patients treated with direct composite resin.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:“Conical tooth anomaly” is defined as those anomalies associated with volumes and shapes of the teeth, and as the malformation in which dental crowns are similar with cone and shape bluntly and in which mesiodistal crown size is smaller than cervical size.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although many treatment options are adopted for regaining the aesthetic structure and functions in such individuals, direct and indirect options are generally preferred.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this case report we have presented 3 patients presenting with “conical tooth anomaly” following the clinical and radiographical evaluation and diagnosis of those patients treated with direct composite resin.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

“Conical tooth anomaly” is defined as those anomalies associated with volumes and shapes of the teeth, and as the malformation in which dental crowns are similar with cone and shape bluntly and in which mesiodistal crown size is smaller than cervical size. Although many treatment options are adopted for regaining the aesthetic structure and functions in such individuals, direct and indirect options are generally preferred. In this case report we have presented 3 patients presenting with “conical tooth anomaly” following the clinical and radiographical evaluation and diagnosis of those patients treated with direct composite resin.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDIN, N., KARAOĞLANOĞLU, S., MERSİN, T. Ö., OKTAY, E. A., DEMİR, F. (2019). Aesthetic restoration of peg lateral incisors with direct composite resin. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 1, 25–27. https://ajindex.com/articles/225240

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Nieminen P. Genetic basis of tooth agenesis. J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.) 2009;312B: 320-342
  2. De Coster PJ, Marks LA, Martens LC, Huysseune A. Dental agenesis: genetic and clinical perspectives. J Oral Pathol Med. 2009; 38(1):1-17
  3. Küçükeşmen Ç, Küçükeşmen HC. The esthetic and functional treatment with composit veneer restorations of three different cases affected by conical tooth anomaly. Journal of Dental Faculty of Ankara University. 2005;32(3): 215-221
  4. Alvesalo L, Portin P. The inheritance pattern of missing, peg-shaped, and strongly mesio-distally reduced upper lateral incisors. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 1969;27(6):563-575
  5. Miller WB, McLendon WJ, Hines FB. Two treatment approaches for missing or konik-shaped maxillary lateral incisors: a case study on identical twins. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 1987; 92(3):249-256
  6. Kim JH, Choi N, Kim S. A retrospective study of association between konik-shaped maxillary lateral ıncisors and dental anomalies. The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry 2017;41(2):150-153
  7. Kotsomitis N, Freer TJ. Inherited dental anomalies and abnormalities. ASDC Journal of Dentistry for Children. 1997; 64(6):405-408
  8. Chattopadhyay A, Srinivas K. Transposition of teeth and genetic etiology. Angle Orthod. 1996; 66(2):147-152
  9. Bäckman B, Wahlin YB. Variations in number and morphology of permanent teeth in 7-year-old Swedish children. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2001;11(1):11-17
  10. Altug-Atac AT, Erdem D. Prevalence and distribution of dental anomalies in orthodontic patients. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2007;131(4):510-514
  11. Celikoglu M, Konik K, Yıldırım Y, Ceylan İ. Investigation of the maxillary lateral incisor agenesis and associateddental anomalies in an orthodontic patient population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012;17 (6):e1068-1073
  12. Hua F, He H, Ngan P, Bouzida W. Prevalence of konik-shaped maxillary permanent lateral incisors: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2013;144(1):97-109
  13. Bacetti T. A controlled study of associated dental anomalies. Angle Orthod. 1998; 68(3): 267-274
  14. Gupta SK, Saxena P, Jain S, Jain D. Prevalence and distribution of selected developmental dental anomalies in an Indian population. Journal of Oral Science. 2011; 53(2):231-238
  15. Walls AW, Murray JJ, McCabe JF. Composite laminate veneers: a clinical study. Journal of