Journals / Gülhane Tıp Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 1

The use of and satisfaction with prosthesis and quality of life in patients with combat related lower limb amputation, experience of a tertiary referral amputee clinic in Turkey

Pages
6–10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Future efforts should aim to improve prostheticdevice design and quality of life for patients with combat related lower limb amputation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims:The aim of current study was to evaluate the prosthesis use, level of satisfaction, reported problems and quality of life in patients with combat related lower limb amputation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods:In this descriptive study, a total of 30 patients with 35 amputations were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Future efforts should aim to improve prostheticdevice design and quality of life for patients with combat related lower limb amputation.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Aims:The aim of current study was to evaluate the prosthesis use, level of satisfaction, reported problems and quality of life in patients with combat related lower limb amputation. Methods:In this descriptive study, a total of 30 patients with 35 amputations were included. The survey collected data on basic demographics including age, time since amputation, gender, etiology, level and side of the amputation, daily prosthetic use frequency, daily total prosthetic wearing time, satisfaction with prosthesis, causes of dissatisfaction and any problems related to the amputation. Satisfaction with the prosthetic device was measured with a numeric scale (0 to 10).Quality of life was assessed with Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Results:The leading reasons for rejection or dissatisfaction with the lower limb prosthesis were excessive perspiration, itching and pain. The mean daily prosthesis wearing time was 11.4±3.8 hours. There was a negative correlation between daily prosthesis wearing time and cosmetic anxiety (r:-0.416) (p<0.05). The mean satisfaction level with prosthesis was 7±3.8 and itching, pain and wound were significantly correlated with satisfaction level (r:-0.491, -0.528 and -0.480, with respectively) (p<0.05). SF-36 scores were found to be lower for amputees when compared to those for the general population in Turkey. Conclusions:Participants reported high levels of use and satisfaction with prosthesis, in spite of excessive perspiration, itching and pain. Future efforts should aim to improve prostheticdevice design and quality of life for patients with combat related lower limb amputation.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİR, Y., ATAR, N. M. Ö., GÜZELKÜÇÜK, Ü., AYDEMİR, K., YAŞAR, E. (2019). The use of and satisfaction with prosthesis and quality of life in patients with combat related lower limb amputation, experience of a tertiary referral amputee clinic in Turkey. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 1, 6–10. https://ajindex.com/articles/225239

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Johannesson A, Larsson GU, Ramstrand N, Turkiewicz A, Wiréhn AB, Atroshi I. Incidence of lower-limb amputation in the diabetic and nondiabetic general population: a 10-year population-based cohort study of initial unilateral and contralateral amputations and reamputations. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(2):275-280
  2. Yaşar E, Tok F, Kesikburun S, et al. Epidemiologic data of trauma-related lower limb amputees: A single center 10-year experience. Injury. 2017;48(2):349-352
  3. Ziegler-Graham K, MacKenzie EJ, Ephraim PL, Travison TG, Brookmeyer R. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(1):422-429
  4. Dillingham TR, Pezzin LE, Mackenzie EJ. Limb amputation and limb deficiency: epidemiology and recent trends in the United States. South Med J. 2002;95(8):875-883
  5. Eskelinen E, Lepäntalo M, Hietala EM, et al. Lower limb amputations in southern Finland in 2000 and trends up to 2001. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;27(2):193-200
  6. Jensen PS, Petersen J, Kirketerp-Møller K, Poulsen I, Andersen O. Progression of disease preceding lower extremity amputation in Denmark: a longitudinal registry study of diagnoses, use of medication and healthcare services 14 years prior to amputation. BMJ Open. 2017;7(11):e016030
  7. Asadollahi R, Saghafinia M, Nafissi N, Montazeri A,Asadollahi M, Khatami M. Anxiety, depression and health-related quality of life in those injured by landmines, Ilam, Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J. 2010;16(11):1108-1114
  8. Surrency AB, Graitcer PL, Henderson AK. Key factors for civilian injuries and deaths from exploding landmines and ordnance. Inj Prev. 2007;13(3):197-201
  9. Pezzin LE, Dillingham TR, Mackenzie EJ, Ephraim P, Rossbach P. Use and satisfaction with prosthetic limb devices and related services. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(5):723-729
  10. Murray CD, Forshaw MJ. The experience of amputation and prosthesis use for adults: a metasynthesis. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(14):1133-1142
  11. Hawkins AT, Henry AJ, Crandell DM, Nguyen LL. A systematic review of functional and quality of life assessment after major lower extremity amputation. Ann Vasc Surg. 2014;28(3):763-780
  12. Çelik D, Çoban Ö. Short Form Health Survey version-2.0 Turkish (SF-36v2) is an efficient outcome parameter in musculoskeletal research. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016;50(5):558-561
  13. Demiral Y, Ergor G, Unal B, et al. Normative data and discriminative properties of short form 36 (SF-36)