SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Genel Tıp Dergisi / 1998 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Relation of dental arches morphology of mandible and maxilla to cranio-facial measurements in adults in Konya

Konya ilinde erişkinlerde arkus dentalis maksillaris ve arkus dentalis mandibularis morfolojisinin kraniyofasiyal boyutlarla ilişkisi

M. Ali MALAS
Bünyamin BÜYÜKAVCI
Pages
21–24
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: It is concluded that in this population mandibular bigonial distance and dental arches may be different from other populations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: It was aimed to search the relation of dental arches morphology with cranio-facial structure in adults.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: We examined 50 subjects (25 male, 25 female) aged 17 to 35 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: It is concluded that in this population mandibular bigonial distance and dental arches may be different from other populations.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: It was aimed to search the relation of dental arches morphology with cranio-facial structure in adults. Methods: We examined 50 subjects (25 male, 25 female) aged 17 to 35 years. There was no anomaly in mandibular and cranio-facial morphology, no previous or current orthodontic treatment and clinically normal arch shapes in all cases. Results: There was significant difference between cranio-facial measurements of dental arches in both sexes for transvers and sagittal measurements. Mandible width and intermolar width of lower and upper dental arch were negatively correlated in adult male. Mandible width and face width in adult female and transverse and sagittal measurements of lower and upper dental arch in adult male and female were positively correlated. Conclusion: It is concluded that in this population mandibular bigonial distance and dental arches may be different from other populations.

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmada, erişkinlerde, mandibula ve maksillada, arkus dentalis superior ve arkus dentalis inferior yapısının morfolojik özellikleri ile diğer kraniyofasiyal boyutlar arasındaki ilişkilerin araştırılması amaçlandı. Yöntem: Kraniyofasiyal, maksiller ve mandibular yapılar ile ilgili anomalisi olmayan ve ortodontik bir tedavi, ameliyat veya travma geçirmemiş, klinik olarak normal diş kavsine sahip, yaşları 17-35 arasında değişen, 25 erkek, 25 kadın, toplam 50 olgudan yararlanıldı. Bulgular: Kraniyofasiyal boyutlar ile arkus dentalis superior ve arkus dentalis inferiorun morfolojik özellikleri arasında transversal ve sagittal ölçümler açısından iki cinsiyet arasında anlamlı farklılıkların olduğu tespit edildi. Erişkin erkeklerde mandibula genişliği ile alt ve üst diş kavsindeki intermolar genişlikler arasında negatif, erişkin kadınlarda mandibula genişliği ile yüz genişliği arasında ve erişkin erkek ve kadınlarda alt ve üst diş kavsinin transvers ve sagittal ölçümleri arasında pozitif korelasyonların olduğu saptandı. Sonuç: Çalışılan toplumda mandibula bigonial mesafenin ve diş kavsinin diğer toplumlardan farklı olabileceği kanısına varıldı.

🔖

Cite This Article

MALAS, M. A., BÜYÜKAVCI, B. (1998). Relation of dental arches morphology of mandible and maxilla to cranio-facial measurements in adults in Konya. Genel Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 21–24. https://ajindex.com/articles/225154

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Sadler TW. Longmans’ medical embriyology, 6th ed. USA: Williams & Wilkins; 1990. Soames RW. Skeletal system. In: Williams PL, Bannister LH, Berry MM, Collins P, Dyson M, Dussek JE, Ferguson MWJ, editors. Gray's anatomy, 38th ed. London: Churchill-Livingstone; 1995. p.547-613.
  2. Richards LC, Townsend GC, Brown T, Burgess VB. Dental arch morphology in South Australian twins. Archiv Oral Biol 1990;35:983-9.
  3. Merz ML, Isaacson RJ, Germane N, Rubenstein LK. Tooth diameters and arch perimeters in a black and a white population. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1991;100:53-8.
  4. Frost DE, Kandel BD. Applied surgical anatomy of the head and neck. In: Fonseca RJ, Walker RV, editors. Oral and maxillofacial trauma, Volume 1. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Comp; 1991. p.233-8.
  5. Bishara SE, Jakopsen JR, Treder JE, Stasi MJ. Changes in the maxillary and mandibular tooth size-arch length relationship from early adolescence to early adulthood. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1989;95:46-59.
  6. Laine L, Alvesalo L. Size of the alveolar arch of the mandible in relation to that of the maxilla in 45 females. J Dent Res 1986;65:1432-4.
  7. Myazaki H, Yamaguchi Y, Takehara T. Dental arch and palate in Taiwan aboriginals. Archiv Oral Biol 1993;38:729-35.
  8. Dalidjan M, Sampson W, Townsend G. Prediction of dental arch development: An assessment of Pont’s Index in three human populations. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995;107:465-75.
  9. Athanasiou AE, Droschl H, Bosch C. Data and patterns of transverse dentofacial structure of 6 to 15 year old children: Posteroanterior cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992;101:465-71.
  10. Güray E, Aytan S, Karaman Aİ. Nazal obstrüksiyonlu bireylerde dentofasiyal yapının incelenmesi. Selçuk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 1994;4:1-11.
  11. Yüksel S, Üçem TT. Konjenital ikinci premolar eksikliğinin fasiyal ve dental ark asimetrisine etkisi. Türk Ortodonti Derg 1994;7:201-6.
  12. Germane N, Lindauer SJ, Rubenstein LK, Revere JH Jr, Isaacson RJ. Increase in arc perimeter due to orthodontic expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100:421-7.
  13. Huggare J, Lahtela P, Viljamaa P, Nystrom M, Peck L. Comparison of dental arch dimensions in children from southern and northern Finland. Proceed Finnish Dental Soc 1993;89:95-100.
  14. Tamari K, Shimizu K, Ichinose M, Nakata S, Takahama Y. Relationship between tongue volume and lower dental arch sizes. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1991;100:453-8.
  15. Burdi AR, Lawton TJ, Grosslight J. Prenatal pattern emergence in early human facial development. Cleft Palate 19