Journals / Genel Tıp Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2

Artan yüke karşı egzersiz testi sırasında solunum etkinliğinin antrenmanlı ve sedanter erkek deneklerde karşılaştırılmalı incelenmesi

Pages
57–62
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

While increased VE/VCO2 ratio could be a useful criteria to evaluate reduced aerobic fitness levels, it can not be use to indicate increased aerobic fitness levels.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Ventilatory efficiency, which describes the ratio between ventilation to CO2 output (VE/VCO2) during an incremental exercise test has been used to evaluate fitness levels of the subjects.
📊
Key Findings & Data:During exercise, the lowest VE/VCO2 ratio above 34 shows increased mortality levels.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:While increased VE/VCO2 ratio could be a useful criteria to evaluate reduced aerobic fitness levels, it can not be use to indicate increased aerobic fitness levels.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Ventilatory efficiency, which describes the ratio between ventilation to CO2 output (VE/VCO2) during an incremental exercise test has been used to evaluate fitness levels of the subjects. During exercise, the lowest VE/VCO2 ratio above 34 shows increased mortality levels. In the present study, we comparatively evaluated ventilatory efficiency in trained and sedentary males that the lowest VE/VCO2 ratio could be related fitness levels of the subjects. Materials and Methods: Ten trained (age: 20.1±0.4 yr) and 10 sedentary (age:19.8±0.7 yr) male subjects were performed an incremental exercise (15 W/min) test. Ventilatory gas exchange parameters were evaluated breath-by-breath using metabolic gas analyser. Anaerobic threshold (AT) and respiratory compensation point (RCP) estimated from the gas exchange values. Results: Work rates for trained and sedentary subjects were found to be 143±8 W vs 123±5 W at the AT, 170±9 W vs 148±6 W at the RCP and 222±9 W vs 204±7 W at the end of the test, respectively. VE/VCO2 ratio for trained and sedentary subjects were found to be 32±0.6 vs 32±1.6 at the beginning of test and 26.5±0.7 vs 26±1 at the AT, 27.5±0.7 vs 26±0.9 at the RCP and 30±1.1 vs 30±1.3 at the end of the test. Conclusion: The lowest VE/VCO2 ratio, reflects optimal ventilatory efficiency obtained at the AT and RPC, was not statistically different in both groups. While increased VE/VCO2 ratio could be a useful criteria to evaluate reduced aerobic fitness levels, it can not be use to indicate increased aerobic fitness levels.

Özet

Amaç: Artan yüke karşı yapılan egzersiz sırasında solunum ve CO2 atılımı (VE/VCO2) oranı ile tanımlanmakta olan solunumun etkinliği aerobik fitnes seviyesinin belirlenmesinde kullanılmaktadır. Egzersiz sırasında en düşük VE/VCO2 oranının 34’ün üzerinde olduğu durumlar artan ölüm riskini göstermektedir. Bu çalışmadaki amacımız solunumun etkinliğini antrenmanlı ve sedanter deneklerde karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmesi ve düşük VE/VCO2 oranının fitnes değerlendirilmesinde kullanılıp kullanılamayacağını araştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: On antrenmanlı (yaş 20.1±0.4 yıl) ve 10 sedanter (yaş:19.8±0.7 yıl) erkek denek artan yüke karşı yapılan egzersiz testine katıldılar (15 W/min). Akciğer gaz değişim parametreleri metabolik gaz analizörü ile solunumdan solunuma ölçüldü. Anaerobik eşik (AE) ve solunum kompansasyon noktası (SKN) gaz değişim parametreleri ile hesaplandı. Bulgular: İş gücü antrenmanlı ve sedanter deneklerde AE de 143±8 W ile 123±5 W , SKN de 170±9 W ile 148±6 W ve testin sonunda 222±9 W ile 204±7 W olarak sırası ile bulundular. VE/VCO2 oranı antrenmanlı ve sedanter deneklerde testin başında 32±0.6 ile 32±1.6, AE de 26.5±0.7 ile 26±1, SKN de 27.5±0.7 ile 26±0.9 ve testin sonunda 30±1.1 ile 30±1.3 olarak bulundular. Sonuç: AE ve SKN de elde edilen ve solunum etkinliğini gösteren en düşük VE/VCO2 oranı her iki grupta istatistiksel olarak farklılık göstermedi. Böylece artan VE/VCO2 oranı, zayıflayan aerobik fitnes göstergesi olarak kullanılmasına rağmen, bu kriterin artan fitnes seviyesi göstergesi olarak kullanılamayacağı belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDENK, Ç., ÖZÇELİK, O. (2018). Artan yüke karşı egzersiz testi sırasında solunum etkinliğinin antrenmanlı ve sedanter erkek deneklerde karşılaştırılmalı incelenmesi. Genel Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2, 57–62. https://ajindex.com/articles/224822

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Wasserman K, Hansen JE, Sue DY, et al. Principles of Exercise Testing and Interpretation: Including Pathophysiolgy and Clinical Applications, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 5th edition, 2012.
  2. Palange P, Ward SA, Carlsen KH, et al. Recommendations on the use of exercise testing in clinical practice. Eur Respir J 2007;29 (1): 185-209.
  3. Ozcelik O, Aslan M, Ayar A, Kelestimur H. Effects of body mass index on maximal work production capacity and aerobic fitness during incremental exercise test. Physiol Res 2004;53:165–70. Whipp BJ. Physiological mechanisms dissociating pulmonary CO2 and O2 exchange dynamics during exercise in humans. Exp Physiol 2007;92:347-55.
  4. Algul S, Ugur FA, Ayar A, Ozcelik O. Comparative determination of ventilator efficiency from constant load and incremental exercise testing. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand) 2017;15;63(7):26-30.
  5. Sin PY, Webber MR, Galletly DC, Tzeng YC. Relationship between cardioventilatory coupling and pulmonary gas exchange. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2012;32:476-80.
  6. Sun XG, Hansen JE, Garatachea N, Storer TW, Wasserman K. Ventilatory efficiency during exercise in healthy subjects. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;166:1443-8. Ward SA. Ventilatory control in humans: constraints and limitations. Exp Physiol 2007;92:357-66.
  7. Whipp, BJ, Davis, JA, Wasserman, K. Ventilatory control of the ‘isocapnic buffering’ region in rapidly-incremental exercise. Respir Physiol 1989;76:357-67.
  8. Stringer W, Casaburi R, Wasserman K. Acid-base regulation during exercise and recovery in humans. J Appl Physiol 1992;72:954–61.
  9. Ingle L, Goode K, Carroll S, et al. Prognostic value of the VE/VCO2 slope calculated from different time intervals in patients with suspected heart failure. Int J Cardiol 2007;118:350-5.
  10. Myers J, Arena R, Oliveira RB, et al. The lowest VE/VCO2 ratio during exercise as a predictor of outcomes in patients with heart failure. J Card Fail 2009;15:756-62.
  11. Murphy RM, Weiner RB, Hough SS, et al. Determinants of VE/VCO2 slope in normal individuals – entilator efficiency is modifiable with endurance training. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:13-5.
  12. Kaya H, Özçelik O. Tıp öğrencilerinin bir yılda vücut kompozisyonlarında meydana gelen değişimlerin belirlenmesi Fırat Tıp Dergisi 2005;10(4):164-8.
  13. Whipp BJ, Davis JA, Torres F, Wasserman K. A test to determine parameters of aerobic function during exercise. J Appl Physiol 1981;50:217-21.
  14. Ozcelik O, Ward SA, Whipp BJ. Effect of altered body CO2 stores on pulmonary gas exchang