SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2003 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1

The effects of oviposition time on egg quality in white and brown layers

Yumurtlama zamanının beyaz ve kahverengi yumurtacı hibritlerin yumurta kalitesi üzerine etkileri

AHMET ŞEKEROĞLU
Musa SARICA
Pages
173–175
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Effects of genotype and ovoposition time on-other charecteristics such as specific gravity, breakage strength, yolk indices, Haugh unit and yolk colour were not statisticaly significant.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out to determine the effects of oviposition time on egg quality charecteristics in white and brown layers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The effect of genotype on eggs shape index (P<0.05) and on shall thickness (P<0.01) was statisticaly significant.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Effects of genotype and ovoposition time on-other charecteristics such as specific gravity, breakage strength, yolk indices, Haugh unit and yolk colour were not statisticaly significant.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:kümes hayvanları · yumurta tavuğu · genotip

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine the effects of oviposition time on egg quality charecteristics in white and brown layers. The effect of genotype on eggs shape index (P<0.05) and on shall thickness (P<0.01) was statisticaly significant. The effect of ovoposition time on albumen index was significant (P<0.05). Effects of genotype and ovoposition time on-other charecteristics such as specific gravity, breakage strength, yolk indices, Haugh unit and yolk colour were not statisticaly significant.

Özet

Bu çalışma yetiştirme sisteminin (Altlıklı yer ve serbest ) genotipin ve yumurtlama zamanının yumurta kalite özelliklerine etkisini araştırmak amacıyla yapılmıştır. Yumurta şekil indeksine (P<0.05) ve kabuk kalınlığına (P<0.01) genotiplerin etkisi, yumurta ak indeksine de yumurta toplama zamanının etkisi önemli bulunmuştur (P<0.05). Ele alman özgül ağırlık, kırılma direnci, sarı indeksi. Haugh birimi ve sarı rengi gibi'diğer özelliklerde önemli farklılıklar bulunmamıştır P(<0.05).

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞEKEROĞLU, A., SARICA, M. (2003). The effects of oviposition time on egg quality in white and brown layers. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1, 173–175. https://ajindex.com/articles/224706

References (16)

  1. Sheldon, B,L.,.2000. World's Poultry Science Assosacation Invited Lecturü. Research And Development In 2000. Directions And Priorities For The World's Poultry Science Community. Poultry Science 79:147-158.
  2. Broom, D.M, 2001. Assessing The Welfare Of Hens And Broilers. Proc. Aust. Poult. SCI. Sym. 2001,1-13.
  3. Holt, P.S., 1995. Horizontal Transmission Of Salmonella Enteritis In Molted And Unmolted Laying Chickens. Avian Diseases 39:239-249.
  4. Rollin, B.E, 1995.
  5. Famı Animal Welfare Social, Bisethical And Research Issues Ames: Iowa State University Press.
  6. Gentle, M.J., 1986. Beak Trimming hi Poultry World's Poultry Science Journal 42:268-275.
  7. Appleby, M.C., 1991. Do Hens Suffer In Battery Cage? Institute Of Ecology And Resource Management The University Of Edinburg. Lymbery, P., 1997. Beyond The Battery A Welfare Charter For Laying Hen A Compassion In World Farming, Farm Animal Welfare Council Uluocak, N., 1991. Yumurta Büyüklüğü Nelere Bağlıdır. Teknik Tavukçuluk Dergisi. TOK Bakanlığı Tavukçuluk Araş.Enst.Müd. 72 (25-40)
  8. Ankara.
  9. Türkoğlu, M., Arda, M., Yetişir, R., Sanca, M., Ersaym, C, 1997.
  10. Tavukçuluk Bilimi. Samsun. Keeling, L.J., Dun, A., 1988. Polythene Housing For Free Range Layers: Bird Performance And Behavior, Poultry Report. The West Of Scotland Scottish Agricultural College. Technical Note, Number:249, Auchincrvive, Ayr, January 1988.
  11. Pavlovski, Z., Masic,B., Josipovic,S., Hopic,S.,1992. The Effect Of System Of Housing On The Laying Performance Of Hens hi Small Flocks. Biotechnologija U Stocarstvu, Vol.8, No. 1-2,Pp. 57-63.
  12. Mostert, Be, Bowers, E.H., Van Der Walt, J.C., 1995. Influence Of Different Housing Systems On The Performance Of Hens Of Four Laying Strains. S. Afr. J. Animal Sci., 1995, 25(3) 80-86.
  13. Hughes, B.O., Dun, P., 1983. Production And Behavior Of Laying Domestic Fowls hi Outside Pens (Abstract). Applied Animal Ethology, 1983, Vol.11, No.2,P.201. Purvis, J.,1986. Practical Experience Of Free Range Egg Production. Agriculture hi Northern Ireland, 1986, Vol.1, No.4, pp. 18-19.
  14. Pavlovski, Z., Hopic, S., Uracar, S., Masic, B., 1994a. The Effect Of Housing System On Interval Egg Quality hi Small Layer Flocks. Biotech. U Stocarstvu 10(5-6) P.37,43,1994.
  15. Pavlovski, Z., Svetlana, V., Masic, B., 1994b. The Effect Of Housing System On External Egg Quality Traits hi Small Layers Flocks. Biotehnologija U Stocarstvu 10 (3-4) P. 13-20.
  16. Sauveur, B.,.1991. Effect Of Method Of Rearing Of Fowls On Egg Characters. Production Animales,l 991,Vol.4, No.2, Pp