Journals / Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2

The Use of Probiotic in Aquaculture

Su Ürünleri Yetiştiriciliğinde Probiyotiklerin Kullanımı

Pages
13–18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Further probiotic bacteria can function as agents that improve water quality.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Disease outbreaks are recognized as important constrains to aquaculture production and trade.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The development of antibiotic resistance has become a growing concern; thus, there is an urgent need for alternatives to antimicrobials, currently, the most prevalent agent used for disease control in aquaculture.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Further probiotic bacteria can function as agents that improve water quality.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Probiyotik · su ürünleri yetiştiriciliği · balık

Abstract

Disease outbreaks are recognized as important constrains to aquaculture production and trade. The development of antibiotic resistance has become a growing concern; thus, there is an urgent need for alternatives to antimicrobials, currently, the most prevalent agent used for disease control in aquaculture. An alternatives forms of disease control is the use of probiotics. Probiotics function as microbial control agents and are usually defined as a live microbial feed supplement which beneficially effect the host animal by improvements in the intestinal microbial balance, enhancement of the immune response of the animal. Further probiotic bacteria can function as agents that improve water quality.

Özet

Su ürünleri yetiştiriciliğinde hastalıklar, üretimi ve ticareti sınırlayan en önemli etken olarak bilinmektedir. Bunun yanında canlılarda antibiyotiklere karşı direncin artması önemli bir problemdir. Bundan dolayı, su ürünleri yetiştiriciliğinde hastalıkların kontrolünde yoğun olarak kullanılan antimikrobiyallere karşı alternatife ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır. Probiyotikler, hastalıkların kontrolünde kullanılan alternatif bir yol olup ve genellikle besin desteği olarak yeme veya suya ilave edilen canlı mikrobiyallerdir. Bu tip maddeler, bağırsak mikroflorasında denge sağlayarak ve konak canlının bağışıklık cevabını geliştirerek canlının sağlığına olumlu etki ederler. Bunun yanında probiyotikler, su kalitesinin iyileştirilmesinde de etkilidirler.

🔖

Cite This Article

TURGUT, E., DEVELİ, N., TIRIL, S. U. (2007). The Use of Probiotic in Aquaculture. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2, 13–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/224623

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Balcazar, J. L., Vendrell, D., Blas I., Zarzuela, I. R., Girones, O., and Muzquiz, J. L. 2007. Immune modulation by probiotic strains: Quantification of phagocytosis of Aeromonas salmonicida by leukocytes isolated from gut of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) using a radiolabelling assay. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 29, 5-6; 335-343
  2. Balcazar, J.L., Blas, I., Zarzuela, I.R., Cunningham, D., Vendrell, D. and Muzquiz, J. L. 2006. The role of probiotics in aquaculture. Veterinary Mikrobiol., 114, 173-186.
  3. Barug, D., Jong, J., Kies A.K., and Verstegen., M.W.A. 2006. Antimicrobial growth promoters. Where do we go from here? Wageningen Academic Publishers. 422 pp Byund, J.W., Park, S.C., Ben, Y., and Oh, T.K. 1997. Probitic effect of Lactobacillus sp. DS-12 in flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). Journal of General and Applied Microbiology, 43, 305-308.
  4. Cai, Y., Benno, Y., Nakase, T. and Oh, T.K. 1998. Specific probiotic characterization of Weissella hellenica DS-12 isolated from flounder intestine. Journal of general and Applied Microbiology, 44, 311-316.
  5. Carnevali, O., Zamponi, M.C., Sulpizio, R., Rollo, A., Nardi, M., Orpianesi, C., Silvi, S., Caggiano, M., Polzonetti, A.M. and Cresci, A. 2004. Administration of probiotic strain to improve sea bream wellness during development. Aquaculture International, 12, 377-386.
  6. Chang, C-I. and Liu, W-Y. 2002. An evaluation of two probiotic bacterial strains, Enterococcus faecium SF68 edwardsiellosis in cultured European eel, Anguilla anguilla L. Journal of Fish Disaeses, 25, 311-315.
  7. DeSchrijver, R and Ollevier, F. 2000. Protein digestion in juvenile turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) and effects of dietary administration of Vibrio proteolyticus. Aquaculture, 186, 107-116.
  8. Gatesoupe, F. J., 1999. The use of probiotics in Aquaculture 180: 48-165
  9. Gatesoupe, F.J. 1991. Siderophore production and probiotic effect of Vibrio sp. associated with turbot larvae, Scophthalmus maximus. Aquatic Living Resources, 10, 239-246.
  10. Gatesoupe, F.J. 1991. The effect of three strains of lactic abcteria on the production rate of rotifers, Brachionus plicatilis, and their diatary value for larval turbot, Scophthalmus maximus. Aquaculture 96. 335-342.
  11. Gatesoupe, F.J. 1994. Lactic acid bacteria the resistance of turbot larvae Scophthalmus maximus against pathogenic Vibrio. Aquatic Living Resources, 7, 277-282.
  12. Gibson, L. F. 1999. Bacteriocin activity and probiotic activity of Aeromonas media. Journal of Applied Microb