Journals / Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of pregnancy and neonatal outcome in spontaneous and invitro fertilization (IVF) twin pregnancies

Spontan ve invitro fertilizasyon ikiz gebeliklerinde gebeliğe ait ve neonatal verilerin karşılaştırılması

Pages
250–254
Publication Date
2018-12-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Perinatal mortality rates were found similar in both groups.Conclusion: In conclusion, it was shown in this study that the risks of preterm birth and lowbirthweight which are already higher in twin pregnancies than in singleton pregnancies were evenhigher in the IVF twin pregnancies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: This study aimed to investigate whether the differences between twininvitrofertilization (IVF) and twin spontaneous pregnancies in terms of pregnancy and perinataloutcome.Material and Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study carried out by examining the data ofdichorionic-diamniotic twin pregnancies with live births in a private hospital between 2015 and 2018.There were two study groups which were the twin pregnancy group with spontaneous pregnancyand the IVF twin group with pregnancy via assisted reproductive techniques.Results: Pregnancy and birth problems did not differ between the two groups.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The IVF twinpregnancies were observed to have higher rates of preterm birth, low birthweight and APGAR 1stminute scores.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Perinatal mortality rates were found similar in both groups.Conclusion: In conclusion, it was shown in this study that the risks of preterm birth and lowbirthweight which are already higher in twin pregnancies than in singleton pregnancies were evenhigher in the IVF twin pregnancies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:IVF · İkiz gebelikler · tekil gebelikler

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to investigate whether the differences between twininvitrofertilization (IVF) and twin spontaneous pregnancies in terms of pregnancy and perinataloutcome.Material and Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study carried out by examining the data ofdichorionic-diamniotic twin pregnancies with live births in a private hospital between 2015 and 2018.There were two study groups which were the twin pregnancy group with spontaneous pregnancyand the IVF twin group with pregnancy via assisted reproductive techniques.Results: Pregnancy and birth problems did not differ between the two groups. The IVF twinpregnancies were observed to have higher rates of preterm birth, low birthweight and APGAR 1stminute scores. Perinatal mortality rates were found similar in both groups.Conclusion: In conclusion, it was shown in this study that the risks of preterm birth and lowbirthweight which are already higher in twin pregnancies than in singleton pregnancies were evenhigher in the IVF twin pregnancies. It is recommended in accordance with these results that singleembryo transfers should be preferred and iatrogenic multiple pregnancies should not beencouraged.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı invitro fertizasyon(IVF) tedavisi ile gerçekleşen ikiz gebelikler ilespontan gerçekleşen ikiz gebeliklerin gebelik ve perinatal dönem bulguları açısındankarşılaştırılmasıdır.Materyal ve Method: Bu çalışma, 2015-2018 yılları arasında, canlı doğumu gerçekleşen dikoryonikdiamniotik ikiz gebeliklerin verileri incelenerek gerçekleştirilmiş bir retrospektif kohort çalışmasıdır.Bu araştırmada gebeliği spontan olarak gerçekleşmiş ikiz gebelikler grubu ve yardımcı üremeteknikleri kullanılarak gebe kalmış IVF ikiz grubu olmak üzere iki çalışma grubu vardırBulgular: Gebeliğe ve doğuma ait problemler her iki grup arasında farklılık göstermemiştir. IVF ikizgebeliklerinde prematurite, düşük doğum ağırlığı ve 1. Dakika APGAR skor düşüklüğü oranlarınındaha fazla olduğu görülmüştür. Perinatal mortalite oranları her iki grupta benzer bulunmuştur.Sonuç: Bu çalışmada gösterilmiştir ki; ikiz gebeliklerde tek gebeliklere göre zaten daha yüksekriske sahip olan erken doğum ve düşük doğum ağırlığı riskleri, IVF ikiz gebeliklerinde daha da fazlaartmaktadır. Bu sonuçlar gözönüne alınarak tek embryo transferine yönelmek ve iatrojenik çoğulgebeliklere destek vermemek önerilmelidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞİMŞİR, C., KALEM, Z., BAKIRARAR, B., KALEM, M. N. (2018). Comparison of pregnancy and neonatal outcome in spontaneous and invitro fertilization (IVF) twin pregnancies. Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3, 250–254. https://ajindex.com/articles/22442

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Kaveh M, Ghajarzadeh M, Davari Tanha F, Nayeri F, Keramati Z, et al. Pregnancy Complications and Neonatal Outcomes in Multiple Pregnancies:A Comparison between Assisted Reproductive Techniques and Spontaneous Conception. Int J Fertil Steril. 2015;8(4):367-72. Elster N. Less is more: the risks of multiple births. The Institute for Science, Law, and Technology Working Group on Reproductive Technology. Fertil Steril. 2000;74(4):617-23.
  2. Kerin JF, Warnes GM, Quinn PJ, Jeffrey R, Kirby C, Matthews CD, et al. Incidence of multiple pregnancy after in-vitro fertilisation and embryo transfer. Lancet. 1983;2(8349):537-40.
  3. Pandey S, Shetty A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S, Maheshwari A. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18(5):485-503
  4. Qin J, Wang H, Sheng X, Liang D, Tan H, Xia J. Pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in multiple pregnancies resulting from assisted reproductive technology: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(6):1492-508.e1-7. Massenkeil G, Alexander T, Rosen O, Dörken B, Burmester G, Radbruch A, et al. Long-term follow-up of fertility and pregnancy in autoimmune diseases after autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Rheumatol Int. 2016;36(11):1563-1568.
  5. Peterson B, Boivin J, Norré J, Smith C, Thorn P, Wischmann, T. An introduction to infertility counseling: a guide for mental health and medical professionals. J Assist Reproduction Gen.2012; 29(3), 243-248.
  6. Sazonova A, Källen K, Thurin-Kjellberg A, Wennerholm UB, Bergh C. Factors affecting obstetric outcome of singletons born after IVF. Human Reprod.2011; 26(10), 2878-2886.
  7. Greil AL, Slauson‐Blevins K, McQuillan J. The experience of infertility: a review of recent literature. Soc Health Ill. 2010;32(1), 140-162.
  8. Barda, G., Gluck, O., Mizrachi, Y., & Bar, J. (2017). A comparison of maternal and perinatal outcome between in vitro fertilization and spontaneous dichorionic-diamniotic twin pregnancies. J Matern Fet Neo Med. 2017; 30(24), 2974-2977.
  9. Pinborg A, Loft A, Schmidt L, Langhoff‐Roos J, Andersen AN. Maternal risks and perinatal outcome in a Danish national cohort of 1005 twin pregnancies: the role of in vitro fertilization. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004; 83(1), 75-84.
  10. Luke B, Gopal D, Cabral H, Stern JE, Diop H. Adverse pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes in twins: effects of maternal fertility status and infant gender combinati