Journals / Fırat Tıp Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4

Effects of nebivolol and telmisartan on blood pressure, diastolic functions, lipid and glucose metabolism in hypertensive cases

Hipertansif olgularda nebivolol ve telmisartan’ın kan basıncı, diyastolik fonksiyonlar, lipid ve glukoz metabolizması üzerine etkileri

Pages
201–209
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our study supports the fact that priority should be given to the property of effectively reducing blood pressure, rather than pharmacokinetic properties of the drug of choice in the treatment of essential hypertension.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Nebivolol and Telmisartan has been claimed to ensure effective control of the blood pressure and target organ.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: The study enrolled 100 patients whose mean age was 50.1 ± 9.9 and who had essential hypertension (50 patients were administered 5 mg/day Nebivolol and 50 patients were administered 80 mg/day Telmisartan for six months).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our study supports the fact that priority should be given to the property of effectively reducing blood pressure, rather than pharmacokinetic properties of the drug of choice in the treatment of essential hypertension.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Lipidler · Hipertansiyon · Glukoz

Abstract

Objectives: Nebivolol and Telmisartan has been claimed to ensure effective control of the blood pressure and target organ. The aim of our study was to investigate the effects of nebivolol and telmisartan on glucose-lipid metabolism, as well as diastolic dysfunction and left ventricle hypertrophy, which are held responsible for target organ damage. Materials and Methods: The study enrolled 100 patients whose mean age was 50.1 ± 9.9 and who had essential hypertension (50 patients were administered 5 mg/day Nebivolol and 50 patients were administered 80 mg/day Telmisartan for six months). Results: Mean blood pressure fell from 108.1±9.6 mmHg to 88.8±6.8 mmHg in the nebivolol group (p=0.001) and from 108.8±2.2 mmHg to 95.3±3.5 mmHg in the telmisartan group (p=0.001). Insulin resistance changed from 3.27±2.15 to 3.72±2.02 in the nebivolol group (p=0.13) and from 2.56±1.3 to 2.72±1.52 in the telmisartan group (p>0.05). Echocardiography showed a decrease in the left ventricle mass indices (p<0.05) and a significant improvement in left ventricle diastolic functions (p<0.05) in both groups. Conclusion: Nebivolol and Telmisartan improve left ventricle hypertrophy and diastolic functions, but do not affect the glucose metabolism. Both drugs have positive effects on lipid metabolism. It was seen that the effect of nebivolol on blood pressure, diastolic functions and left ventricle mass were better than those of telmisartan. Our study supports the fact that priority should be given to the property of effectively reducing blood pressure, rather than pharmacokinetic properties of the drug of choice in the treatment of essential hypertension.

Özet

Amaç: Nebivolol ve Telmisartan etkin kan basıncı kontrolü sağlar ve hedef organ hasarı üzerine olumlu etkileri vardır. Çalışmamızın amacı nebivolol ve telmisartanın glükoz-lipid metabolizması üzerine ve hedef organ hasarından sorumlu tutulan diyastolik disfonksiyon ve sol ventrikül hipertrofisi (SVH) üzerine olan etkilerini irdelemek idi. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya yaş ortalaması 50.1±9.9 olan esansiyel hipertansiyonlu 100 hasta alındı. Elli hastaya Nebivolol 5 mg/gün, diğer 50 hastaya ise Telmisratan 80mg/gün altı ay süre ile verildi. Bulgular: Ortalama kan basıncı nebivolol grubunda 108.1±9.6 mmHg’dan 88.8±6.8 mmHg’a (p=0.001), telmisartan grubunda ise, 108.8±2.2 mmHg’dan 95.3±3.5 mmHg’a geriledi (p=0.001). İnsülin direncinde nebivolol grubunda 3.27±2.15’den 3.72±2.02’ye (p=0.13) telmisartan grubunda ise 2.56±1.3’den 2.72±1.52’ye değişim tespit ettik (p>0.05). Ekokardiyografik olarak her iki grupta da sol ventrikül kitle indekslerinde azalma (p<0.05) ve sol ventrikül diyastolik fonksiyonlarında anlamlı düzelme saptandı (p<0.05). Sonuç: Nebivolol ve Telmisartan sol ventrikül hipertrofisini, diyastolik fonksiyonları düzeltir. Glükoz metabolizması üzerine etkisizdir. Her iki ilaçta lipid metabolizmasını olumlu yönde etkilemiştir. Nebivolol kan basıncı, diyastolik fonksiyonlar ve sol ventrikül kitlesi üzerine olan etkisi telmisartandan daha iyi olduğu görüldü. Çalışmamız esansiyel hipertansiyon tedavisinde seçilecek ilacın, kan basıncı etkin düşürme özelliğinin, farmakokinetik özelliklerinden daha ön planda olması gerektiğini desteklemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DAĞLI, N., KARACA, I. (2006). Effects of nebivolol and telmisartan on blood pressure, diastolic functions, lipid and glucose metabolism in hypertensive cases. Fırat Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4, 201–209. https://ajindex.com/articles/223781

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Report of the Joint National Commite on prevention, detection, eveluation and treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC-VI) Guidelines for the management of hypertension. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157: 2413-2466
  2. Andrew MD, Lip GYH, Blann D. Relation Endothelium, thrombogenesis, and haemorheology in systemic hypertension to ethnicity and left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Cordiol 1997; 80: 1566-1571
  3. Leysen JE, Pauwels PJ, Gommeren W, Lommen G, Janssen PAJ. The receptor binding profile of the new antihypertensive agent nebivolol and its steroisomers compared with various betaadrenergic blockers. Dur Invest 1991; 3(suppl 1): 120-121
  4. Janssens WJ, Xhonneux R, Janssen PAJ. Animal pharmacology of Nebivolol. Drug Investşgation 3 (Suppl. 1): 1991; 13-24
  5. Janssens WJ, Van de Water A, Xhonneux R, Reneman RS, Van Nueten JM, Janssen PA. Nebivolol is devoid of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity. Eur J Pharmacol 1989 Jan 2; 159: 89- 95
  6. The sixt report of Jiont İnternational Committe on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and treatment of high blood pressure; NIH Publication, November 1997
  7. Kurtz TW, Pravenec M. Antidiabetic mechanisms of angiotensinconverting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists: beyond the renin-angiotensin system. J Hypertens 2004; 22: 2253-2261
  8. Haffner SM, Miettinen H, Stern MP. The homeostasis model in the San Antonio Heart Study.Diabetes Care 1997 Jul; 20: 1087- 1092
  9. Castellanos A, Kessler KM, Myerburg RJ. The resting electrocardiogram. In Alexander RW, Schlant RC, Fuster V. Hurst's The Heart, volume 1, USA, The McGraw-Hill Companies, 9 th edition, 1998; pp.371
  10. Devereux RB. Method of recognition and assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy. Medicographia 1995; 17: 12
  11. Devereux RB, De simone G, Schlussel CY. Echocardiographic left ventricular mass predicts risk of developing subseguent borderline hypertension. Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 15: 210-18
  12. Garcia MJ, Thomas JD, Klein AL. New doppler echocardiographic applications for the study of diastolic dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32: 865-875
  13. Andrew MD, Lip GYH, Blann D. Relation Endothelium, thrombogenesis, and haemorheology in systemic hypertension to ethnicity and left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Cordiol 1997; 80: 1566-1571
  14. Gifford RWJ, Kirkendall W, O’Connor DT, Weidman W. Office evaluation of hypertension. A statement for health professionals by a writing group of the Council for High Blood Pressure Research, American Heart As