Journals / Fırat Tıp Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 4

Determination of adenomyosis incidence in hysterectomy materials

Histerektomi materyallerinde adenomyozis sıklığının araştırılması

Pages
247–249
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Adenomyosis must be remembered in mind in patients admitted to clinic due to different causes and before managing treatment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To determine the frequency of adenomyosis in hystrectomy materials.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: We herein analyse the adenomyozis frequency in histopathologic evaluation of 241 abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy materials performed due to bening causes in Sarahatun Obstetric and Gynecology Clinic and demographic properties of these patients are evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Adenomyosis must be remembered in mind in patients admitted to clinic due to different causes and before managing treatment.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To determine the frequency of adenomyosis in hystrectomy materials. Materials and Methods: We herein analyse the adenomyozis frequency in histopathologic evaluation of 241 abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy materials performed due to bening causes in Sarahatun Obstetric and Gynecology Clinic and demographic properties of these patients are evaluated. Results: 241 hysterectomy materials are evaluated in this study and 52 adenomyosis (%21.6) case are determined. Conclusion: Adenomyosis must be remembered in mind in patients admitted to clinic due to different causes and before managing treatment.

Özet

Amaç: Histerektomi materyallerinde adenomyozis sıklığının saptanması amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmamızda Sarahatun Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Kliniği'nde bening nedenlerle total abdominal ve vaginal histerektomi yapılan 241 hastanın postoperatif histerektomi materyallerinin histopatolojik değerlendirmelerinde adenomyozis sıklığı ve bu vakaların demografik özellikleri incelendi. Bulgular: Bu çalışmada toplam 241 histerektomi materyali incelendi ve 52 tanesinde (%21,6) adenomyozis varlığı tespit edildi. Sonuç: Adenomyozis tanısı, değişik nedenlerle kliniğe başvuran hastalarda tedavi planlaması esnasında akılda tutulmalıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAVAK, S. B. (2009). Determination of adenomyosis incidence in hysterectomy materials. Fırat Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 4, 247–249. https://ajindex.com/articles/223729

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Zaloudek C, Hendrickson MR. Mesenchymal tumors of the uterus. In Blausteins' pathology of the female genital tract. Kurman RJ ed. Fifth edition, New York: Springer, 2002: 561-573
  2. Ferenczy A. Pathophysiology of adenomyosis. Hum Reprod Update. 1998; 4: 312-22
  3. Kumar V, Cotran R, Robbins SL. Basic Pathology. Fifith edition, Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1992: 615-616
  4. Pernoll ML. Obstetrik ve Jinekoloji El Kitabı. Ayhan A (Çeviren). 10. baskı, Ankara: Palme, 2002: 755-767
  5. Parazzini F, Vercellini P, Panazza S, Chatenoud L, Oldani S, Crosignani PG. Risk factors for adenomyosis. Hum Reprod. 1997; 12: 1275-1279
  6. Matalliotakis IM, Katsikis IK, Panidis DK. Adenomyosis: what is the impact on fertility? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 17: 261-264
  7. Atri M, Reinhold C, Mehio AR, Chapman WB, Bret PM. Adenomyozis: US features with histologic correlation in an in vitro study. Radiology. 2000; 215: 783-790
  8. Speroff L, Fritz MA. Klinik Jinekolojik Endokrinoloji ve İnfertilite. Erk A, Günalp S (Çeviren). 7. baskı, Ankara: Güneş Tıp Kitabevi, 2007: 562-605
  9. Ayhan A. Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Bilgisi. 2. baskı, Ankara: Güneş Tıp Kitabevi, 2008: 969-981
  10. Kunz G, Beil D, Huppert P, Noe M, Kissler S, Leyendecker G. Adenomyosis in endometriosis prevalence and impact on fertility. Evidence from magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 2309-2316
  11. Farquhar C, Brosens I. Medical and surgical management of adenomyosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006; 20: 603-616
  12. Azziz R. Adenomyosis in pregnancy. J. Reprod. Med.1986; 31: 224-227
  13. McCausland V, McCausland A. The response of adenomyosis to endometrial ablation/resection. Hum Reprod Update, 1998; 4: 350-359
  14. Wood C, Maher P, Hill D. Biopsy diagnosis and conservative surgical treatment of adenomyosis. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 1993; 33: 319-321
  15. Fong YF, Singh K. Medical treatment of a grossly enlarged adenomyotic uterus with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. Contraception, 1999; 60: 173-175
  16. Sheng J, Zhang WY, Zhang JP, Lu D. The LNG-IUS study on adenomyosis: a 3-year follow-up study on the efficacy and side effects of the use of levonorgestrel intrauterine system for the treatment of dysmenorrhea associated with adenomyosis. Contraception, 2009; 79: 189-193
  17. Igarashi M, Abe Y, Fukuda M, Ando A, Miyasaka M, Yoshida M. Novel conservative medical therapy for uterine adenomyosis with a danazol-loaded intrauterine device. Fertil Steril, 2000;