Journals / Fırat Tıp Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 4

The preventing effects of lisinopril, sildenafil and combined usage of them on the formation of intra-abdominal adhesion

Lisinopril,sildenafil ve birliktekullanımlarının karıniçi yapışıklık oluşmasınıönleyici etkileri

Pages
167–169
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Their combination does not incre- ase their potencies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In this study, it was aimed to compare the effectiveness of lisinopril and sildenafil on the prevention of intraabdominal adhesions and to investigate whether there was a synergistic effect if they were combined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:No medication was given to rats in group 1, lisinopril (6.5 mg/kg/d) in group 2, sildenafil (0.8 mg/kg/d) in group 3, and lisinopril combined with sildenafil in group 4 were given to rats by gavage for 7 days.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Their combination does not incre- ase their potencies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: In this study, it was aimed to compare the effectiveness of lisinopril and sildenafil on the prevention of intraabdominal adhesions and to investigate whether there was a synergistic effect if they were combined. Materials and Methods: Fourty rats divided into four groups and mesothelial damage created. No medication was given to rats in group 1, lisinopril (6.5 mg/kg/d) in group 2, sildenafil (0.8 mg/kg/d) in group 3, and lisinopril combined with sildenafil in group 4 were given to rats by gavage for 7 days. Then, abdominal cavities were re-opened and adhesion scores were determined. Results: The mean intra-abdominal adhesion scores of groups were 2.3±0.5, 0.9±0.7, 0.6±0.8, and 0.7±0.9, respectively. The mean adhesion scores of all treatment groups were significantly lower than control group (p<0.001). Whereas, there were no statistically differences between treatment groups (group 2 vs group 4 p>0.05,and group 3 vs group 4 p>0.5). Conclusion: : Lisinopril and sildenafil alone is effective in preventing the formation of intra-abdominal adhesions. Their combination does not incre- ase their potencies.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada lisinopril ve sildenafilin karın içi yapışıklıkları önlemedeki etkinliklerinin karşılaştırılması ve birlikte uygulanmaları halinde sinerjik etki gösterip göstermeyeceklerinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Kırk adet rat 4 gruba ayrılıp mezotel hasarı oluşturuldu. Birinci gruptaki ratlara her hangi bir ilaç verilmez iken 2. gruptakilere lisinopril (6.5 mg/kg/gün), 3. gruptakilere sildenafil (0.8 mg/kg/gün) ve 4. gruptakilere hem lisinopril hem de sildenafil gavaj yoluyla 7 gün verildi. Sonra karın boşluğu tekrar açılıp yapışıklık skorları belirlendi. Bulgular: Grupların ortalama karın içi yapışıklık skorları sırasıyla 2.3±0.5, 0.9±0.7, 0.6±0.8 ve 0.7±0.9 idi. Tüm tedavi gruplarının yapışıklık skorları kontrol grubununkinden belirgin olarak daha düşüktü (p 0.05, grup 3 vs grup 4 p>0.5). Sonuç: Lisinopril ve sildenafil tek başlarına karın içi yapışıklık gelişmesini önlemede etkilidir. Birlikte kullanımları onların güçlerini artırmaz.

🔖

Cite This Article

KIRKILa, C., COŞKUN, S., BÜLBÜLLER, N., AYGEN, E., KARABULUT, K. (2011). The preventing effects of lisinopril, sildenafil and combined usage of them on the formation of intra-abdominal adhesion. Fırat Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 4, 167–169. https://ajindex.com/articles/223643

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Hellebrekers B, Trimbos-Kemper T, Trimbos J, Emeis J, Kooistra T. Use of fibrinolytic agents in the prevention of post-operative adhesion formation. Fertil Steril 2000
  2. Nair S, Bhat I, Aurora A. Role of proteolytic enzyme in the prevention of post-operative intraperitoneal adhesions. Arch Surg 1974
  3. Kıkırdak T, Uysal E, Korun N. Karın içi yapışıklıkların ön- lenmesinde metilprednizolonun farklı dozlarının etkinliğinin incelenmesi. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2008
  4. Lauder CIW, Garcea G, Strickland A, Maddern GJ. Abdomi- nal adhesion prevention: Stil a sticky subject? Dig Surg 2010
  5. Bulbuller N, Ilhan YS, Kirkil C, Cetiner M, Gogebakan O, Ilhan N. Can angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors prevent postoperativ adhesions? J Surg Res 2005
  6. Batukan C, Ozgun MT, Basbug M, Muderris II. Sidenafil reduces postoperative adhesion formation in a rat uterine horn model. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007
  7. Mollnau H, Wendt M, Szocs K et al. Effects of angiotensin II infusion on the expression and function of NAD(P)H oxidase and components of nitric oxide/cGMP signaling. Circ Res 2002
  8. 58–65. 8.Rybalkin SD, Rybalkina IG, Feil R, Hofmann F, Beavo JA. Regulation of cGMP-specific phosphodiesterase (PDE5) phosphorylation in smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem 2002
  9. 3310–3317. 9.Krause TJ, Zazanis GA, McKinnon RD. Prevention of posto- perative adhesions with the chitin derivate N-O- carboxymethylchitosan. Wound Repair Regen 1996
  10. Morgan HE, Baker KM. Cardiacneural, and endocrine dependence.25. hypertrophy. Mechanical, Circulation 1991
  11. Wolf G, Haberstroh U, Neilson EG. Angiotensin II stimulates the proliferation and biosynthesis of type I collagen in cultured murine mesengial cells. Am J Pathol 1992
  12. Brilla CG, Maisch B, Weber KT. Renin-angiotensin system and myocardial collagen matrix remodeling in hypertansive heart disease. In vivo and in vitro studies on collagen matrix regulation. Coin Invest 1993
  13. Weber KT, Sun Y, Tyagi SC, Clentjens JP. Collagen network of the myocardium: function, structural remodeling and regu- latory mechanisms. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1994
  14. Marshall RP, McAnulty RJ, Laurent GJ. Angiotensin II is mitogenic for human lung fibroblasts via activation of the type I receptor. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000
  15. Mezzano SA, Ruiz-Ortega M, Egido J. Angiotensinrenal fibro