Journals / Experimental Biomedical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 4

Evaluation of the resistance patterns of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains to antituberculous drugs

Pages
143–148
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Determination of TB resistance profiles, as well as proper and regular treatment, will contribute to the control of MDRTB.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To determine the resistance profile of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) strains to first-line antituberculous drugs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A total of 138 patients with MTBC growth from 2008-2018 were evaluated retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Determination of TB resistance profiles, as well as proper and regular treatment, will contribute to the control of MDRTB.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008-2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Aim: To determine the resistance profile of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) strains to first-line antituberculous drugs. Methods: A total of 138 patients with MTBC growth from 2008-2018 were evaluated retrospectively. The Ehrlich-Ziehl-Neelsen (EZN) staining method was used for direct smear preparations, the BACTEC MGIT 460 TB system the Lowenstein-Jensen medium for culture planting and the BACTEC NAP test for the diagnosis of MTBC. Susceptibility tests were performed using the BACTEC MGIT 460 TB system with the streptomycin, isoniazid, rifampicin and ethambutol (SIRE) kit in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. Results: Of the total 138 tuberculosis (TB) cases, 44 (31.9%) were female and 94 (68.1%) were male. MTBC was most frequently isolated from pulmonary specimens (90.6%). Acid-resistant bacilli (ARB) positivity was detected in 88 (63.8%) samples by EZN staining for culture-positive samples. In our study, without considering single or multiple drug resistance (MDR), total resistance rates in MTBC strains were determined for, isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RIF), ethambutol (EMB), and streptomycin (SM); 10.1%, 4.3%, 2.9%, and 12.3% respectively. While the susceptibility to all drugs was 82.6%, multiple drug–resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) was 2.9%. Conclusion: These results are important since they are the first data reported from our province regarding the determination of the resistance profile to anti-TB drugs. Resistance rates in our study were very close to the 2016 data average of the Ministry of Health of Turkey. Determination of TB resistance profiles, as well as proper and regular treatment, will contribute to the control of MDRTB.

🔖

Cite This Article

BEHCET, M., KARABORK, S., AVCIOGLU, F., KARAİBRAHİM, A., KURTOGLU, M. G. (2019). Evaluation of the resistance patterns of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains to antituberculous drugs. Experimental Biomedical Research, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 4, 143–148. https://ajindex.com/articles/223514

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Pai M, Behr MA, Dowdy D, Dheda K, Divangahi M, Boehme CC, et al. Tuberculosis. Nat Rev Dis Primer. 2016; 2:16076
  2. Mesfin YM, Hailemariam D, Biadglign S, Kibret KT. Association between HIV/AIDS and multi-drug resistance tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS One. 2014; 9(1):e82235
  3. Özmen E, Aslan A, Uçar M, Aydın H, Yılmaz A. Resistance ratios of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains isolated in Erzurum Regional Tuberculosis Laboratory against major antituberculosis drugs. ANKEM Derg. 2017; 31(2):53-58
  4. Gagneux S. Ecology and evolution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018; 16(4):202-13
  5. Taşbent FE, Doğan M. Resistance rates of mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains to the primary anti-tuberculosis drugs in konya province, Turkey. Türk Mikrobiyol Cem Derg. 2016; 46(4):165-71
  6. Karataş M, Kuyucu T, Sevim T. Evaluation of 1753 patients treated with the diagnosis of tuberculosis. CMJ. 2019; 41(1):34-41
  7. Türkiye’de Verem Savaşı 2018 Raporu. TC. Sağlık Bakanlığı Halk Sağlığı Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara;2018. [cited 2019 Jul 17]. Available from: https://www.toraks.org.tr/userfiles/file/Turk iyede-Verem-Savas-2018-Raporu.pdf
  8. Singh P, Kant S, Gaur P, Tripathi A, Pandey S. Extra-pulmonary tuberculosis: An overview and review of literature. Int J Life Sci Scienti Res. 2018; 4(1):1539-40
  9. Çiftçi F, Bozkanat E, İlvan A, Kartaloğlu Z, Sezer O, Çalışkan T, et al. The year of 2003 treatment results of soldier patients with tuberculosis in a military hospital which has feature of the referance. Turk Thorac J. 2006; 7(1):45-50
  10. Solovic I, Jonsson J, Korzeniewska- Koseła M, Chiotan DI, Pace-Asciak A, Slump E, et al. Challenges in diagnosing extrapulmonary tuberculosis in the European Union, 2011. Euro Surveill. 2013; 18(12):pii=20432
  11. Öncel B, Karahasan A, İlki A, Söyletir G. Sensitivity ratios in Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolates. ANKEM Derg. 2019; 33(1):1-5
  12. Korkmaz G, Balcı İ, Bayram A, Karslıgil T. Major drug susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex: Comparison of bactec and agar proportion methods. Turkish Journal of Infection. 2006; 20 (1):7-14
  13. Abdulmajed O, Koç AN, Gültekin A, Atalay MA, Kılıç H. Comparison of the conventional identification methods in the isolation of mycobacteria strains from the clinical samples and determination of susceptibilities to primary antituberculosis agents. Journal of Health Sciences. 2012; 21(2) 127-35
  14. Aydın F, K