SavedAdd your journal

Journals / EKEV Akademi Dergisi / 2020 / Sayı: 83

“MOBBING” ACCORDING TO ADMINISTRATORS AND TEACHERS WORKING AT NON-FORMAL EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS

SÜLEYMAN KARATAŞ
Reyhan ŞEKERCİ
Tayfun YÖRÜK
Pages
601–614
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the research result; Many of the administrators and teachers stated that there are various examples of such behaviors even if they are not exposed to daunting actions, and they stated that more research, legal regulation, precautionary and preventive intervention studies should be done on this subject.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to reveal the opinions of managers and teachers working in non-formal education about mobbing.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study group of the research consists of 10 participants, 5 administrators and 5 teachers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the research result; Many of the administrators and teachers stated that there are various examples of such behaviors even if they are not exposed to daunting actions, and they stated that more research, legal regulation, precautionary and preventive intervention studies should be done on this subject.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Non-Formal Education · Mobbing · Administrator

Abstract

The aim of this study is to reveal the opinions of managers and teachers working in non-formal education about mobbing. In this research, in which qualitative research method was used, the participants were determined by sampling easily accessible sampling methods. The study group of the research consists of 10 participants, 5 administrators and 5 teachers. The research is one of the qualitative research patterns in the science pattern. Therefore, a semi-structured interview form was prepared to collect data and the interview technique was used. The data were analyzed by content analysis technique. All the data obtained in the research were coded, various dimensions and themes suitable for these dimensions were determined in accordance with the purpose of the research, percentages and frequencies related to themes were calculated. According to the research result; Many of the administrators and teachers stated that there are various examples of such behaviors even if they are not exposed to daunting actions, and they stated that more research, legal regulation, precautionary and preventive intervention studies should be done on this subject.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARATAŞ, S., ŞEKERCİ, R., YÖRÜK, T. (2020). “MOBBING” ACCORDING TO ADMINISTRATORS AND TEACHERS WORKING AT NON-FORMAL EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS. EKEV Akademi Dergisi, Sayı: 83, 601–614. https://ajindex.com/articles/223442

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Acar, A.B. and Dündar, G. (2008). Investigation of the relationship between frequency of mobbing exposure at workplace and demographic features, Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Business Administration, 37 (2), 111-120.
  2. Balci, A. (2004). Research in social sciences. Ankara:
  3. Pegem Publishing. Cemaloglu, N. and Ertürk, A. (2008). Aspect of intimidation exposed by teachers and school principals, Bilig, 46, 67-86.
  4. Celik, C. (2009). Physical attack at work (Bullying), Adana: Nobel Publishing. CicekSaglam, A. (2008). Teacher views on mobbing (Emotional violence) in primary schools, Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 32,133-14.
  5. Civilidag, A., &Sargin, N. (2011). Farklı ortaöğretim kurumlarında çalışan öğretmenlerde psikolojiktaciz (Mobbing): Antalya ili örneği. Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(3), 11-22.
  6. Demirel, Y. (2009). A Study on the comparison of psychological harassment behavior among public institutions. TİSK Academy. Dikmetas E., Top M., Ergin G. (2011). Investigation of burnout and mobbing levels of assistant physicians, Turkish Journal of Psychiatry; 22 (3), 137-49.
  7. Filizöz, B., Ay F. A. (2011). A Research on the relationship between mobbing and burnout in organizations, e-journal of New World Sciences Academy, 1306-3111. Groeblinghoff. D & Becker M. (1996). A case study of mobbing and theclinical treatment of mobbing victims, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 277-294.
  8. Gün H. (2010). Psychological harassment in work environment, Ankara:
  9. Laser Publishing. Karasar, N. (2009). Scientific research method. Ankara:
  10. Nobel Publishing. Karavardar, G. (2010). The relationship between psychological intimidation and some personality traits, e-journal of New Word Sciences Academy, p.1308-7444.
  11. Koc, M. and Urasoglu B., H. (2009). Mobbing in secondary school teachers: analysis of gender age and high school type variables, International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 1(1), 64 - 80. Kus, E. (2003). Quantitative-qualitative research techniques. Ankara:
  12. Anı Publishing. Kus, E. (2007). Quantitative-qualitative research techniques. (2nd Ed.)Ankara:
  13. Anı Publishing. Mason J. (2002). Qualitative researching. (2nd Ed.) London: Sage Publications Ltd. Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K. And Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13-22.
  14. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation