Journals / Ege Tıp Dergisi / 2000 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 1

Dermatoglyphic signs in patients with colon cancer

Kolon kanserli hastalarda dermatoglifik bulgular

Pages
39–44
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this report it was found that the values of both fingertips and palm patterns were clearly significant, in patients with colon cancer.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between colon cancer and dermatoglyphics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore, fingerprints and palm prints from 27 cases with histologically proven colon cancer were compared to fingerprints and palms from 50 controls with no history of any malignant disease.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this report it was found that the values of both fingertips and palm patterns were clearly significant, in patients with colon cancer.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kolon neoplazmları · Dermatoglifikler · El parmakları

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between colon cancer and dermatoglyphics. Therefore, fingerprints and palm prints from 27 cases with histologically proven colon cancer were compared to fingerprints and palms from 50 controls with no history of any malignant disease. On the fingertips of colon cancer cases, whorl types, total finger ridge count of male patients, were more then those of the control cases. Palmar III loops and t triradii were less, palmar H loops and palmar a-b ridge count of male patients were more. Furthermore, the frequency of the ending of the palmar A line of patients in 5" was more than controls. In this report it was found that the values of both fingertips and palm patterns were clearly significant, in patients with colon cancer. It is concluded that the dermatoglyphic analysis will contribute to the genetic studies performed in colon cancer because of its easy applicability without causing trauma to the patient, rapid results and low cost.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, kolon kanseri ve dermatoglifikler arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırmaktır. Bunun için, kolon kanseri olan 27 olgunun parmak izleri ve avuç içi izleri herhangi bir hastalığı olmayan 50 kontrol olgusu ile karşılaştırıldı. Kolon kanserli olguların el parmak uçlarında düğüm tipleri, erkek hastaların toplam çizgi sayısı kontrollere göre daha fazla, palmar III ilmeği ve t triradiusu daha az, palmar H ilmeği ve erkek hastaların palmar a-b çizgi sayısı daha fazladır. Ayrıca, A temel çizgisinin 5 noktasında sonlanma sıklığının kontrollere göre fazla olduğu görüldü. Çalışmamızda kolon kanserli hastalarda parmak uçları ve avuç içi örnekleri anlamlı bulundu. Dermatoglifik analizlerin hastalarda travma olmaksızın uygulama kolaylığı, hızlı ve ucuz oluşu kolon kanseri ile yapılacak genetik çalışmalara katkıda bulunacağı sonucuna varıldı.

🔖

Cite This Article

POLAT, M. H., CANER, M. (2000). Dermatoglyphic signs in patients with colon cancer. Ege Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 1, 39–44. https://ajindex.com/articles/223141

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (23)

  1. Champe PC, Harvey RA. Biochemistry. Çev: Tokullugil A, Dirican M, Ulukaya E. Biyokimya.2.baskı
  2. Faeron ER.Cho KR. The molecular biology of cancer.ln: Rimoin DL, Connor JM, Pyeritz RF, eds. Emery and Rimoin's principles and practice of medical genetics. 3rcl ed. NewYork:Churchill Livingstone 1996: 405-438
  3. Heim S, Mitelman F. Cancer Cytogenetics. 2nd ed, NewYork: Alan R Liss Inc 1989:265-282
  4. Friedman JM, Dili JF, McGillivary B. Genetics. Çev: Özkınay F, Özkınay C. Genetik. 1 baskı, i izmir.Saray Medikal Yayıncılık San ve TicLtd Şti 1995: 104-130
  5. Beaudet AL, Scriver CR, Siy WS, Valle D. The metabolic and molecular bases of inherited diseases. NewYork:McGraw-HİII,1997
  6. Geleniler TD, Francis SC. Ginsburg D.Principles of Medical Genetics.8nd ed Wİlliams & Wilkins Baltimore 1998.245-272
  7. Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B.Lessons from hereditary colorectal cancer. Celi 1996;87:159-170
  8. Galton F.Fİngerprints. NeWYork: Mac Millan Co, 1892
  9. Babler WJ.Prenatal seleetion and dermatoglyphic patterns. Am J Phys Anthropol 1978;48:21-27
  10. Mulvihill JJ, Smith DW. The genesis of dermatoglyphics. J Pediatr 1979; 75:578-89
  11. Schaumann B, Alter M. Dermatoglyphics in medical disorders. NewYork:Springer-Verlag 1976
  12. Purvis-Smith SG, HoWard RP, Menser MA. Dermatoglyphics defects and rubella teratogenesis JAMA 1969:209:1865-872
  13. Purvis-Smith SG, Menser MA. Genetic and enviromental influences on digital dermatoglyphics in congenital rubella. Pediatr Res 1973;7:215-19
  14. Purvis-Smith SG, Hayes K, Menser MA. Dermatoglyphics in prenatal cytomegalovirus infeetion. Lancet 1972;2:976
  15. Wright HT, Parker CE, MavalWala JD. Unusual dermatoglyphic findings associated with eytomegalic inelusion disease of infaney. Clin Med 1972:116:14-20
  16. HoltSB.The significance of dermatoglyphics in medicine. Clin Pediatr 1973:12:471-84
  17. Preus M, Fraser FC.Dermatoglyphics and syndromes. Am J Dis Child 1972; 124:933-43
  18. Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JR. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co 1982: 487-90
  19. Singh D. Dermatoglyphic study in breast cancer. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 1979;22:27-29
  20. Atasu M, Telatar H. Dermatoglyphics and cancer. Lancet 1968;1:861
  21. Charlton SG.Dermatoglyphics, blood-groups and cancer. Lancet 1970:1:627
  22. Chaube R. Palmar creases and diseases:Cancer and tuberculosis. Açta Genet Med Gemellol 1977; 26:293-95
  23. Fuller IC. İnherited predisposition to cancer? A dermatoglyphic study. Br J Cancer 1968: