Journals / Ege Tıp Dergisi / 2001 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 2

The role of enteroclysis in the evaluation of small bowel lesions

İnce barsak lezyonlarının gösterilmesinde enteroklizisin yeri

Pages
131–135
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We concluded that, enteroclysis is a sensitive technique in the detection and evaluation of the lesions of the small intestines.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Imaging of the lesions of the small intestines has been challenging, Enteroclysis, a technique popularised by Herlinger; has been proposed to detect specifically the small intestinal lesions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this paper; 21 cases presenting to Ege University General Surgery Department with gastrointestinal complaints and symptoms have been studied retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We concluded that, enteroclysis is a sensitive technique in the detection and evaluation of the lesions of the small intestines.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Geriyedönük çalışma · Araştırma teknikleri · Bağırsak

Abstract

Imaging of the lesions of the small intestines has been challenging, Enteroclysis, a technique popularised by Herlinger; has been proposed to detect specifically the small intestinal lesions. In this paper; 21 cases presenting to Ege University General Surgery Department with gastrointestinal complaints and symptoms have been studied retrospectively. Of these 21 patients, operation confirmed; Croishn disease in seven, leiomyoma in six, lymphoma in four, Posttraumatic stenosis in one, postoperative stenosis in one, angiofollicular lymph node hyperplasia (Castleman's disease) in one and adeno carcinoma in one patient. In all cases, enteroclysis has been success ful to locate the lesion and define the nature and extention of the disease. We concluded that, enteroclysis is a sensitive technique in the detection and evaluation of the lesions of the small intestines.

Özet

İnce barsak lezyonlarının radyolojik olarak görüntülenmesi oldukça güçtür. Herlinger'in popularize ettiği enteroklizis yöntemi sayesinde ince barsak lezyonlarının spesifik olarak görüntülenebileceği düşünülmektedir Bu çalışmada gastrointestinal sistem yakınma ve bulguları ile kliniğimize başvuran 21 olgu retrospektif olarak incelenmiştir. Öpere edilen olguların; yedisinde Crohn, altısında düz kas hücreli tümör, dördünde ince barsak lenfoması, birinde posttravmatik darlık, birinde anjiofolliküler lenf nodu hiperplazisi (Castleman hastalığı), birinde postoperatif darlık, birinde adeno karsinom saptanmıştır. Tüm olgularda enteroklizisin anatomik olarak lezyonu lokalize ettiği, lezyonu'n doğası ve yayılımı hakkında bilgi verdiği görülmüştür. Biz enteroklizis tekniğinin ince barsak lezyonlarının tespiti konusunda oldukça duyarlı bir yöntem olduğu düşüncesindeyiz.

🔖

Cite This Article

İLKGÜL, Ö., İÇÖZ, G., KORKUT, M., TERCAN, M., BİLGEN, I., ELMAS, N. (2001). The role of enteroclysis in the evaluation of small bowel lesions. Ege Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 2, 131–135. https://ajindex.com/articles/223085

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Sellink JL. Proceedings: Why enteroclysis of the small intestine? Br J Radiol 1976;49: 288-289
  2. Herlinger H. A modified technique for the double contrast small bovvel enema. Gastrointest Radiol. 1978;3:201-207
  3. Maglinte DD, Hail R, Miller RE, et al. Detection of surgical lesions of small bovvel by enteroclysis. Am J Surg 1984; 147:225-229
  4. Maglinte DD, Burney BT, Miller RE. Technical factors for more rapid enteroclysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1982; 138: 588-591
  5. Nolan DJ, Cadtnan PJ, Jeffree MA. Detailed per-oral small bovvel examination versus enteroclysis. Radiology 1985; 157: 836-837
  6. Barioon TJ, Lu CC, Franken EA, et al. Small bovvel enteroclysis survey. Gastrointest Radiol. 1988; 13:203-206
  7. Caroline DF, Herlinger H, Laufer I, et al. Small bowel enema in the diagnosis of adhesive obstructions. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1984;142:1133-1139
  8. Bartram Cl. The radiological demonstration of adhesions follovving surgery for inflammatory bovvel disease. Br J Radiol 1980; 53: 650-653
  9. Maglinte DDT, Burney BT, Miller RE. Lesions missed on small bovvel follovv-through: Analysis and recommendations. Radiology 1982: 144:737-739
  10. Nolan DJ. Marks CG. The barium infusion in small intestinal obstruction. Clin Radiol 1981; 32: 651-655
  11. Umschaden HW, Szolar D, Gasser J, et al. Small-bowel disease: comparison of MR enteroclysis images with conventional enteroclysis and surgical findings. Radiology 2000; 215:717-725
  12. Balthazar EJ. CT of small bowel obstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;162:255-261
  13. Regan F, Beall DP, Bohlman ME, et al. Fast MR imaging and the detection of small-bovvel obstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170:1465-1469
  14. Mark B, Ever S, Courtney M. Small intestine. Scvvartz SI, ed. Principles of Surgery. 7nci baskı. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1999: 1239- 1240
  15. Altaca G, Sayek i: ince barsak tümörleri. Sayek I, ed. Temel Cerrahi. 2. baskı. Ankara, Güneş Kitabevi. 1993: 748-755
  16. DİSario JA, Burt RW, Vargas H, McWhorter WP. Small-bovvel cancer: epidemiologicai and clinical characteristics from a population-based registry. Am J Gastroenterol 1994; 89: 699-701
  17. Lambert P, Minghim A, Pincus W, et al. Treatment and prognosis of primary malignant small-bovvel tumors. Am Surg 1996;62:709- 715
  18. Olmsted W W, Ros PR, Hjermstad BM, et al. Tumors of the small intestine with liftle or no malignant predisposition: A review of the literatüre and report of 56 cases. Gastrointest Radiol 1987; 12:231-239
  19. Bessette JR, Mag