SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ege Tıp Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 2

Intracellular trafficking and cell behaviour characteristics

Hücre içi trafik ve hücre davranış özellikleri

BERRİN ÖZDİL BAY
HÜSEYİN AKTUĞ
ÇEVİK GÜREL
KUBİLAY DOĞAN KILIÇ
Gökçe Ceren KUŞÇU
Yasemin ADALI
Pages
102–110
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of this review is to clarify concepts of cell shape, differentiation capacity, cytoskeleton, cell motility and polarity in terms of cell division mechanisms which are important in the discovery of cell behavior.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Cell behavior, differentiation and cell division pattern is vital for living organisms.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Cellular differentiation and diversification is directly and indirectly affected by cell skeleton, cell polarity, intracellular and extracellular signals, cell shape and movement from the early embryonic stage.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of this review is to clarify concepts of cell shape, differentiation capacity, cytoskeleton, cell motility and polarity in terms of cell division mechanisms which are important in the discovery of cell behavior.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Cell behavior, differentiation and cell division pattern is vital for living organisms. Cellular differentiation and diversification is directly and indirectly affected by cell skeleton, cell polarity, intracellular and extracellular signals, cell shape and movement from the early embryonic stage. Atypical cell behavior is observed in embryogenesis and occasionally in oncogenesis. Intracellular traffic in the basis of this behavior and the assessment of extrinsic information to the cell are still needed to be investigated. The aim of this review is to clarify concepts of cell shape, differentiation capacity, cytoskeleton, cell motility and polarity in terms of cell division mechanisms which are important in the discovery of cell behavior.

Özet

Hücre davranışı ve farklılaşmasının yanı sıra hücre bölünme modeli de canlılar için hayati önem taşımaktadır. Hücresel farklılaşma ve hücre çeşitliliği, doğrudan ve dolaylı olarak erken embriyonik aşamada hücre iskeleti, hücre polaritesi, hücre içi ve hücre dışı sinyaller gibi biyolojik süreçlerin yanı sıra, hücre şekli ve hareketinden de etkilenir. Atipik hücre davranışı, embriyogenezde ve bazen onkogenezde gözlenmektedir. Hücre içi trafik, hücrenin dışarıdan gelen sinyallere verdiği cevaplar ve hücre davranışı yönünden daha kapsamlı değerlendirilmelidir. Bu derlemenin amacı: hücre davranışının anlaşılmasında önemli yer tutan; hücre bölünme mekanizmaları açısından hücre şekli, hücrenin farklılaşma kapasitesi, hücre iskeleti, hücre motilitesi ve hücre polaritesi kavramlarını birbirleri ile ilişkilendirerek açıklamaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAY, B. Ö., AKTUĞ, H., GÜREL, Ç., KILIÇ, K. D., KUŞÇU, G. C., ADALI, Y. (2017). Intracellular trafficking and cell behaviour characteristics. Ege Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 2, 102–110. https://ajindex.com/articles/222712

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Shahriyari L, Komarova NL. Symmetric vs. asymmetric stem cell divisions: An adaptation against cancer? PloS One. 2013;8(10):e76195
  2. Yatabe Y, Tavare S, Shibata D. Investigating stem cells in human colon by using methylation patterns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2001;98(19):10839-44
  3. Horvitz HR, Herskowitz I. Mechanisms of asymmetric cell division: Two Bs or not two Bs, that is the question. Cell 1992;68(2):237-55
  4. Glotzer M. Cleavage furrow positioning. J Cell Biol 2004;164(3):347-51
  5. Cowan CR, Hyman AA. Asymmetric cell division in C. elegans: Cortical polarity and spindle positioning. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2004;20:427-53
  6. Neumuller RA, Knoblich JA. Dividing cellular asymmetry: asymmetric cell division and its implications for stem cells and cancer. Genes Dev 2009;23(23):2675-99
  7. Lechler T, Fuchs E. Asymmetric cell divisions promote stratification and differentiation of mammalian skin. Nature 2005;437(7056):275-80
  8. Smart IH. Variation in the plane of cell cleavage during the process of stratification in the mouse epidermis. Br J Dermatol 1970;82(3):276-82
  9. Fuchs E, Raghavan S. Getting under the skin of epidermal morphogenesis. Nat Rev Genet 2002;3(3):199-209
  10. Watt FM. Role of integrins in regulating epidermal adhesion, growth and differentiation. EMBO J 2002;21(15):3919-26
  11. Blanpain C, Lowry WE, Pasolli HA, Fuchs E. Canonical notch signaling functions as a commitment switch in the epidermal lineage. Genes Dev 2006;20(21):3022-35
  12. Le Roy H, Zuliani T, Wolowczuk I, et al. Asymmetric distribution of epidermal growth factor receptor directs the fate of normal and cancer keratinocytes in vitro. Stem Cells Dev 2010;19(2):209-20
  13. Williams SE, Beronja S, Pasolli HA, Fuchs E. Asymmetric cell divisions promote notch-dependent epidermal differentiation. Nature 2011;470(7334):353-8
  14. Ray S, Lechler T. Regulation of asymmetric cell division in the epidermis. Cell Div 2011;6(1):12
  15. Teixido-Travesa N, Villen J, Lacasa C, et al. The gammaTuRC revisited: A comparative analysis of interphase and mitotic human gammaTuRC redefines the set of core components and identifies the novel subunit GCP8. Mol Biol Cell 2010;21(22):3963-72
  16. Cooper GM. The Cell: A Molecular Approach. 2nd ed, ASM Press; Boston:2000
  17. Paluch E, Heisenberg C-P. Biology and physics of cell shape changes in development. Curr Biol 2009;19(17):R790-9
  18. Lange JR, Fabry B. Cell and tissue mechanics in