Journals / Eastern Journal of Medicine / 2017 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3

Hospitalization timeliness of patients with myocardial infarction

Pages
103–109
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is recommended to improve institute of the family physician on the country scale, which will help to conduct continuous surveillance of the population, to increase patient awareness regarding basic symptoms of the disease.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Timely self-help measures and management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) improve the disease outcomes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Only 51% of patients appeal to self-help measures and 28% arrived at hospital within 2 hours after the onset of symptoms. 65% of the patients misunderstand the nature of pain. 28% of patients had pain resistance behavior.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is recommended to improve institute of the family physician on the country scale, which will help to conduct continuous surveillance of the population, to increase patient awareness regarding basic symptoms of the disease.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Timely self-help measures and management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) improve the disease outcomes. Management of AMI is most beneficial if applied within two hours from the onset of symptoms. However, many patients with AMI do not benefit because of seeking medical care late. The aim of research was to study to timeliness of prehospital phase of treatment and investigate the causes of postponement in seeking treatment among patients with AMI. Within the framework of the quantitative research, the beneficiaries were interviewed with a structured questionnaire. The majority of patients did not have necessary pre-hospital self-help measures, and called to the doctor when it was already late. Only 51% of patients appeal to self-help measures and 28% arrived at hospital within 2 hours after the onset of symptoms. 65% of the patients misunderstand the nature of pain. 28% of patients had pain resistance behavior. There is low awareness among the patients about the main symptoms of the disease and importance of call for an emergency in timely manner. Consequently, only a small part has been hospitalized in the first hours. Low development of the primary health care system in Georgia has negative impact on the quality of medical surveillance of the patient. It is recommended to improve institute of the family physician on the country scale, which will help to conduct continuous surveillance of the population, to increase patient awareness regarding basic symptoms of the disease.

🔖

Cite This Article

VERULAVA, T., MAGLAKELİDZE, T., JORBENADZE, R. (2017). Hospitalization timeliness of patients with myocardial infarction. Eastern Journal of Medicine, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3, 103–109. https://ajindex.com/articles/222637

References (12)

  1. Townsend N, Wilson L, Bhatnagar P, Wickramasinghe K, Rayner M, Nichols M. Cardiovascular disease in Europe: epidemiological update 2016. Eur Heart J 2016; 37: 3232-3245
  2. Health Care, Statistical Yearbook. Ministry of Labour, Health and Social Affairs of Georgia. National Center for Disease Control and Public Health 2015
  3. Mendis S, Puska P, Norrving B. Global Atlas on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Control. Geneva: World Health Organization 2011
  4. Smith SC Jr, Benjamin EJ, Bonow RO, et al. AHA/ACCF secondary prevention and risk reduction therapy for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology Foundation endorsed by the World Heart Federation and the Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58: 2432-2446
  5. Chambless L, Keil U, Dobson A, et al. Population versus clinical view of case fatality from acute coronary heart disease: results from the WHO MONICA Project 1985-1990. Multinational MONItoring of Trends and Determinants in CArdiovascular Disease. Circulation 1997; 96: 3849- 3859
  6. Gilbert JA, Clancy M. Patient knowledge of thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. Emerg Med J 2003; 20: 52-53
  7. Cowie MR, Anker SD, Cleland JG, et al. Improving care for patients with acute heart failure: before, during and after hospitalization. European Journal of Heart Failure 2014; 1: 110-145
  8. Cannon CP, Gibson CM, Lambrew CT, et al. Relationship of symptom-onset-to-balloon time and door-to-balloon time with mortality in patients undergoing angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. JAMA 2000; 283: 2941-2947
  9. De Luca G, Suryapranata H, Ottervanger JP, Antman EM. Time delay to treatment and mortality in primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: every minute of delay counts. Circulation 2004; 109: 1223-1225
  10. Magid DJ, Wang Y, Herrin J, et al. Relationship between time of day, day of week, timeliness of reperfusion, and in-hospital mortality for patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. JAMA 2005; 294: 803-812
  11. De Luca G, Suryapranata H, Ottervanger JP, Antman EM. Time delay to treatment and mortality in primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: every minute of delay counts. Circulation 2004; 109: 1223-1225
  12. Avorn J, Knight E, Ganz DA, Schneeweiss S. Therapeutic delay and reduced functional status six months after thrombolysis for acute myo