SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2

Şizofreni hastalarının bakımıyla ilgilenenlerde yük ve ilişkili özellikler

Burden and Burden-related Features in Caregivers of Schizophrenia Patients

Aslı ÖZLÜ
Mustafa YILDIZ
Tamer AKER
Pages
147–153
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Caregivers using nonfunctional coping styles, should be helped to change their attitudes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Burden, social support and coping methods in caregivers of patients and the relationship between these variables were cross-sectionally evaluated in this study.Method: Demographic form, Zarit Caregiver Burden Scale, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support and Ways of Coping Inventory were administered to the caregivers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: The mean burden score of caregivers participated in the study was 60.45 points.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Caregivers using nonfunctional coping styles, should be helped to change their attitudes.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Burden, social support and coping methods in caregivers of patients and the relationship between these variables were cross-sectionally evaluated in this study.Method: Demographic form, Zarit Caregiver Burden Scale, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support and Ways of Coping Inventory were administered to the caregivers. The correlation of specified load levels with respect to the disease and characteristics of the caregivers were investigated. Results: The mean burden score of caregivers participated in the study was 60.45 points. By gender, burden in female caregivers was higher than men. The burden of employed caregivers was higher than unemployed. Statistically significant negative correlation between monthly income and burden was found. Helplessness and fatalistic attitudes were statistically correlated with burden.Conclusion: Caregivers who are not able to use effective coping styles have heavier burdens. Caregivers using nonfunctional coping styles, should be helped to change their attitudes.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, şizofreni hastalarının bakıcılarında hastalığa bağlı yük, sosyal destek, baş etme yolları ve bu değişkenler arası ilişki kesitsel olarak değerlendirildi.Yöntem: Bakıcılara Demografik Form, Zarit Bakıcı Yük Ölçeği, Çok Boyutlu Algılanan Sosyal Destek Ölçeği ve Baş Etme Yolları Ölçeği uygulandı. Belirtilen yük düzeyinin hastalık ve bakım verenin özellikleri ile ilişkisi incelendi. Bulgular: Çalışmaya katılan bakıcıların yük ölçeğinden aldıkları puan ortalamaları 60.45’dir. Cinsiyete göre bakıldığında kadın bakıcılarda yük, erkek bakıcılara göre; çalışan bakıcıların yükü, çalışmayanlara göre daha yüksek bulunmuştur. Kişi başına düşen aylık gelir ile yük arasında olumsuz yönde ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki bulundu. Çaresizlik ve kaderci yaklaşımın yük ile ilişkili olduğu bulundu.Sonuç: Hastalıkla etkin başa çıkma yollarını kullanamayan bakıcıların yükleri daha yüksek olmaktadır. Eğer bakıcılar hastalıkla baş etmede işlevsel olmayan yollar kullanıyorsa, değiştirilmesi yönünde yardımcı olunmalıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZLÜ, A., YILDIZ, M., AKER, T. (2015). Şizofreni hastalarının bakımıyla ilgilenenlerde yük ve ilişkili özellikler. Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2, 147–153. https://ajindex.com/articles/222552

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Atkinson JM, Coia DA. Families Coping With Schizophrenia: A Practitioner’s Guide to Family Groups. First Ed., Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons, 1995
  2. Jenkins JH, Schumacher JG. Family burden of schizophrenia and depressive illness. Specifying the effects of ethnicity, gender and social ecology. Br J Psychiatry 1999; 174:31-38
  3. Magliano L, Fiorillo A, De Rosa C, Malangone CM, Maj M; National Mental Health Project Working Group. Family burden in long term disease: a comparative study in schizophrenia vs. physical disorders. Soc Sci Med 2005; 61:313-322
  4. Magliano L, Marasco C, Fiorillo A, Malangone C, Guarneri M, Maj M; Working Group of the Italian National Study on Families of Persons with Schizophrenia. The impact of professional and social network support on the burden of families of patients with schizophrenia in Italy. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2002;106:291-298
  5. Gulseren L. Schizophrenia and the family: difficulties, burdens, emotions, needs. Turk Psikiyatri Derg 2002; 13:143-151. (Turkish
  6. Schene AH. Objective and subjective dimensions of family burden. Towards an integrative framework for research. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1990; 25:289-297
  7. Wolthaus JE, Dingemans PM, Schene AH, Linszen DH, Wiersma D, Van Den Bosch RJ, Cahn W, Hijman R. Caregiver burden in recent-onset schizophrenia and spectrum disorders: the influences of symptoms and personality traits. J Nerv Ment Dis 2002; 190:241-247
  8. Magliano L, Fadden G, Madianos M, de Almeida, JM, Held T, Guarnari M, Marasco C, Tosini P, Maj M. Burden on the families of patients with schizophrenia: results of the BIOMED I study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1998; 33:405-412
  9. Pickett SA, Cook JA, Cohler BJ, Solomon ML. Positive parent/adult child relationship: impact of severe mental ilness and caregiving burden. Am J Orthopsychiatry 1997; 67:220-230
  10. Caqueo-Urízar A, Gutiérrez-Maldonado J. Burden of care in families of patients with schizophrenia. Qual Life Res 2006; 15:719-724
  11. Zahid MA, Ohaeri JU. Relationship of family caregiver burden with quality of care and psychopathology in a sample of Arab subjects with schizophrenia. BMC Psychiatry 2010; 10:71
  12. Kadri N, Manoudi F, Berrada S, Moussaoui D. Stigma impact on Moroccan families of patients with schizophrenia. Can J Psychiatry 2004; 49:625-659
  13. Schulze B, Rössler W. Caregiver burden in mental illness: review of measurement, findings and interventions in 2004-2005. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2005; 18:684-6