Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi / 2002 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3

The evaluation of the efficacy of prophylactic antiepileptic drug treatment in preventing seizure recurrence in patients with febrile convulsion

Febril konvülsiyonlu olgularda antiepileptik ilaç profilaksisinin nöbet tekrarını önlemedeki etkinliğinin değerlendirilmesi

Pages
161–166
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Prophylactic antiepileptic drug treatment is recommended for patients with risk factors for recurrent seizures.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Febrile convulsions are the most frequent seizure type in children.
📊
Key Findings & Data:But approximately one third of children with a first febrile seizure experience a recurrence and 2-10% of children who have febrile seizures subsequently develop epilepsy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Prophylactic antiepileptic drug treatment is recommended for patients with risk factors for recurrent seizures.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Nöbetler · febril · Tekrarlama

Abstract

Objective: Febrile convulsions are the most frequent seizure type in children. They usually have a good prognosis. But approximately one third of children with a first febrile seizure experience a recurrence and 2-10% of children who have febrile seizures subsequently develop epilepsy. It has been reported that, prophylactic treatment with antiepileptic drugs significantly reduced the risk of, febrile seizure recurrence. Prophylactic antiepileptic drug treatment is recommended for patients with risk factors for recurrent seizures. But the choice of the antiepileptic drug for prophylactic treatment is at present in debate. In this study, it was aimed to compare the efficacy 'of the antiepileptic 'drugs, including phenobarbital valproate and rectal diazepam in preventing febrile -, seizure recurrences retrospectively by patients who experience risk factors for future febrile seizures. Results Eightynine patients with risk factors for febrile seizures were prescripted prophylactic antiepileptic drug. However, it has been detected that 21 (23.59%) of them were not taken the drug optimally. Of the remaining 68 patients, 22 (32.35%) were prescripted phenobarbital 21 (30.88%) valproate and 25 (36.76%) intermittent rectal diazepam prophylaxis. Of the patients, who were not taken any prophylactic treatment, 56.18% experienced recurrent febrile seizures. In contrast, only 17.65% of patients treated with prophylactic antiepileptic drugs experienced recurrent febrile seizures. The difference was statistically significant. Although there was no significant difference between the efficacy of antiepileptic drugs used, rectal diazepam has been found more efficacious in preventing febrile seizure recurrence. Conclusion: We conclude that, patients with risk factors have to be treated with prophylactic antiepileptic drugs. Between the antiepileptic drugs, intermittent prophylactic treatment with rectal diazepam has been found more efficacious with less side effects.

Özet

Amaç: Febril konvülsiyonlar çocuklardaki en sık nöbet tipidir. Prognozları genellikle iyidir. Ancak üçte bir olguda ilk nöbetten sonra tekrar ve %2-10 olguda ileride epilepsi gelişimi söz konusudur. Antiepileptik ilaçlarla profilaktik tedavinin febril konvülsiyonların tekrarlama riskini anlamlı olarak azalttığı bildirilmiştir. Nöbet tekrarı açısından risk faktörü taşıyan olgularda profilaktik antiepileptik ilaç tedavisi önerilmektedir. Ancak profilakside hangi ilacın tercih edileceği halen tartışmalı bir konudur. Bu çalışmada rekürren febril konvülsiyon açısından risk faktörü taşıyan hastalarda febril nöbetleri önlemede profılaksi amacıyla kullanılan fenobarbital, valproat ve rektal diazepamın etkinlikleri retrospektif olarak karşılaştırılmıştır. Bulgular: Risk faktörü taşıyan 89 febril konvülziyonlu olguya profilaktik antiepileptik ilaç tedavisi verilmiştir. Bunlardan 21'inin (%23.59) profilaktik ilacı çeşitli nedenlerle optimal olarak kullanmadığı gözlenmiştir. Kalan olguların 22'si (%32.35) fenobarbital, 21'i (%30.88) valproik asit ve 25'i (%36.76) intermittent rektal diazepam profîlaksisi almıştır. Profilaktik tedavi almayan olgularda nöbet tekrar oranı %56.18 iken, profilaksi alanlarda bu oran %17.65 olarak saptanmıştır. Bu fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmuştur. Kullanılan antiepileptik ilaçlar arasında nöbet tekrarını önleme bakımından istatistiksel anlamlı fark bulunmamakla beraber rektal diazepamın nöbet tekrarını önlemede diğer ilaçlara göre daha etkili olduğu gözlenmiştir. Sonuç: Risk faktörü taşıyan olgulara profilaktik antiepileptik tedavi verilmesinin yararlı olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır. Antiepileptik ilaçlar arasında etkinliğinin fazla ve uygulanmasının daha güvenli olması nedeniyle intermittent rektal diazepam kullanımının uygun olduğu düşünülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

KURUL, S., DİRİK, E. (2002). The evaluation of the efficacy of prophylactic antiepileptic drug treatment in preventing seizure recurrence in patients with febrile convulsion. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3, 161–166. https://ajindex.com/articles/222513

References (18)

  1. Shinnar S. Febrile seizures. In: Swaiman KF, Smith SA (eds): Pediatric Neurology, third edition. St. Louis, Mosby Inc, 1999;676-682
  2. American Academy of Pediatrics. Provisional Comitee on Quality Improvement. Practice parameter: the neurodiagnostic evaluation of the child with a simple febrile seizure. Pediatrics 1996; 97: 769-778
  3. Annegers JF, Blakely SA, Hauser WA, et al. Recurrence of febrile convulsions in a population-based cohort. Epilepsy Res 1990; 5: 209-216
  4. Bethune P, Gordon KG, Dooley JM, et al. Which child will have a febrile seizure? Am J Dis Child 1993; 147: 35-39
  5. Berg AT, Shinnar S. Complex febrile seizures. Epilepsia 1996; 37:126-133
  6. Topçu M. Febril konvülsiyonlar. Katkı Pediatri Dergisi 1994; 6: 458-463
  7. Annegers JF, Hauser WA, Shirts SB, et al. Facrors prognostic of unprovoked seizures after febrile convulsions. N EnglJ Med 1987; 316: 493-498
  8. Berg AT, Shinnar S, Hauser WA, et al. Predictors of recurrent febrile seizures: a prospective study of the circumstances surrounding the initial febrile seizure. N EnglJ Med 1992; 327: 1122-1127
  9. Offringa M, Bossuyt PMM, Lubsen J, et al. Risk factors for seizure recurrence in children with febrile seizures: a pooled analysis of individual patient data from five studies. J Pediatr 1994; 124: 574-584
  10. Offringa M, Moyer VA. Evidence based management of seizures associated with fever. BMJ 2001; 323: 1111- 1114
  11. Gordon KE, Dooley JM, Camfield PR, et al. Treatment of febrile seizures: the influence of treatment efficacy and side-effect profile on value to parents. Pediatrics 2001; 108:1080-1083
  12. Newton RW. Randomised controlled trials of phenobarbitone and valproate in febrile convulsions. Arch Dis Child 1988; 63: 1189-1191
  13. Akman DG. Confidence intervals for the number needed to treat. BMJ 1998; 317: 1309-1312
  14. Knudsen FU, Paerregaard A, Andersen R, et al. Long term outcome of prophylaxis for febrile convulsions. Arch Dis Child 1996; 74: 13-19
  15. Olson JE, Scher MS, Holtzman D. Effects of anticonvulsants on hyperthermia-induced seizures in the rat pup. Epilepsia 1984; 25: 96-99
  16. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on drugs. Behavioral and cognitive effects of anticonvulsant therapy. Pediatrics 1995; 96: 538-540
  17. McKmlay I, Newton R. Intention to treat febrile convulsions with rectal diazepam, valproate or pheno-barbitone. Dev Med Child Neurol 1989; 31: 617-625
  18. Dreifuss FE, Langer DH, Moline KA, et al. Valproic acid hepatic fatalities.