Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 59

KAYA SINIFLAMA SİSTEMLERİNİN REGRESYON VE SİNİR AĞLARI TEKNİĞİ İLE İLIŞKİLENDİRİLMESİ

REGRESSION ANALYSIS AND NEURAL NETWORK FITTING OF ROCK MASS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS

Pages
354–368
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Implementing the Neural Network fitting also overcame the scatter observed in the regression analysis

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Commonly used rock mass classification systems, Rock Mass Rating (RMR), Q-System, and Geological Strength Index (GSI) were used as input for simple regression and Neural-Network fitting.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The necessary data for this study, consisting of 250 sets of rock mass classification ratings, were collected from an excavation of an underground mine opening during a time interval of more than two years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Implementing the Neural Network fitting also overcame the scatter observed in the regression analysis
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Özet: Yaygın olarak kullanılan kaya kütle sınıflama sistemlerinden sınıflaması · Kaya Kütle Puanı

Abstract

Commonly used rock mass classification systems, Rock Mass Rating (RMR), Q-System, and Geological Strength Index (GSI) were used as input for simple regression and Neural-Network fitting. The relationship between the classification systems can be used for the estimation of unknown classification ratings. The necessary data for this study, consisting of 250 sets of rock mass classification ratings, were collected from an excavation of an underground mine opening during a time interval of more than two years. The rock mass data belongs to the Pliocene-aged Deniş formation in Soma region of Manisa/Turkey. The ratings, basic and adjusted RMR, Q, Q', and GSI were chosen for the simple regression. Three of the equations are suggested to be taken into account due to their strong correlation of determination. These equations can be utilized especially if the rating Q is known and the adjusted RMR is intended to be estimated. Additionally, basic RMR rating can be estimated by considering the GSI as an input. Utilization of the Neural Networks resulted in an improved prediction capability with a greater predicted-measured coefficient of determination. Implementing the Neural Network fitting also overcame the scatter observed in the regression analysis

Özet

seçilmiştir. Bunlar arasından en yüksek determinasyon katsayısına sahip olan üç eşitliğin dikkate alınması önerilmektedir. Eşitlikler, özellikle Q puanı bilindiğinde ve düzeltilmiş RMR’nin kestirilmesinde faydalanılabilir. İlave olarak, Temel RMR puanı GSI kullanılarak kestirilebilmektedir. Sinir Ağı en iyileme uygulaması, iyileştirilmiş bir kestirim imkanını daha yüksek determinasyon katsayısı ile sağlamıştır. Sinir ağları en iyileme uygulaması, regresyonlardaki gözlemlenen saçınımın üstesinden gelinmesini de sağlamıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖGE, İ. F. (2018). KAYA SINIFLAMA SİSTEMLERİNİN REGRESYON VE SİNİR AĞLARI TEKNİĞİ İLE İLIŞKİLENDİRİLMESİ. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 59, 354–368. https://ajindex.com/articles/222498

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Terzaghi, K., 1946. Introduction to tunnel geology. Rock tunnelling with steel supports, pp.17-99. [2] Lauffer, H., den Gebirgsklassifizierung Stollenbau. Geologie und Bauwesen, 24(1), pp.46-51. für Deere, D.U., Hendron, A.J., Patton, F.D. and Cording, E.J., 1966, January. Design of surface and near-surface construction in rock. In The 8th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS). American Rock Mechanics Association. Bieniawski, Z.T., 1989. Engineering rock mass classifications: a complete manual for engineers and geologists in mining, civil, and petroleum engineering. John Wiley & Sons. Bieniawski, Z.T., 1996. Milestones in rock engineering: the Bieniawski jubilee collection. Balkema. Ünal, E., Özkan, İ. and Ulusay, R., 1992. Characterization of weak, stratified and clay-bearing rock masses. In Rock Characterization: ISRM Symposium, Eurock'92, Chester, UK, 14–17 September 1992 (pp. 330- 335). Thomas Telford Publishing. [7] Goel, R.K. and Singh, B., mass 2011. Engineering classification: tunnelling, foundations and landslides. Elsevier. Lowson, A.R. and Bieniawski, Z.T., 2013. Critical Assessment of RMR based Tunnel Design Practices: a Practical Engineer’s Approach. RETC 2013.
  2. Washington, DC USA. Barton, N., Lien, R. and Lunde, J., 1974. Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Rock pp.189-236. Norvegian Geotechnical Institute, 2013. Using the Q-system Rock Mass Classification and Support Design. Oslo 2013. Available online at: www.ngi.no. Accessed 15 December 2014
  3. Suorineni, F.T., Kaiser, P.K. and Henning, J.G., 2008. Safe rapid drifting Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 23(6), pp.682-699.
  4. Suorineni, F.T., 2009, Rock mass classification for pre-excavation support planning and at-face excavation assessment. In. CIM-CARMA2009 Conference, 01 - 01 January 2009. [13] Palmström, A., 2000. Recent developments in rock support estimates by the RMi. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Tunnelling Technology, 6(1), pp.1-19.
  5. Aydan, Ö., Ulusay, R. and Tokashiki, N., 2014. A new rock mass quality rating system: rock mass quality rating (RMQR) and its application to the estimation of geomechanical characteristics of rock masses. Rock mechanics engineering, 47(4), pp.1255-1276.
  6. Hoek, E. and Brown, E.T., 1997. Practical estimates of rock mass strength. International Journal of Sciences, 34(8), pp.1165-1186.
  7. Hoek, E., Carranza-Torres, C. and Corkum, B., 2002. Hoek-Brown failure edition. Proceedings Tac, 1, pp.267-273. of NARMS- [17] Cai