SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 55

Gemi İnşaatında Simülasyon Ortamı Kullanarak Tekil Profil İmalatının İncelenmesi

Investigation of Single Section Part Fabrication in Shipbuilding by Utilizing Simulation Environment

MURAT ÖZKÖK
Pages
79–91
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the other hand, the improvements on edge sweeping and grinding activities have a very little affect on throughput of profile cutting work unit.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Profile preparing process is an important work unit at a shipyard.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In order to preclude these problems, the profile work unit performance has to be satisfactory.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the other hand, the improvements on edge sweeping and grinding activities have a very little affect on throughput of profile cutting work unit.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Profile preparing process is an important work unit at a shipyard. At this station, the specific dimensioned profiles are obtained. In the case of any delay in this work unit, the delivery date may be postponed. In order to preclude these problems, the profile work unit performance has to be satisfactory. In this study, a profile processing work unit of a Turkish Shipyard was considered and the performance analysis was performed by using a simulation software. At the first stage of the study, process analysis of the profile processing work unit was carried out and then the simulation model was created. After that, some scenarios were implemented. It was concluded from these scenarios that the improvements on the operation time of marking-cutting activities increase the production quantity of profile. On the other hand, the improvements on edge sweeping and grinding activities have a very little affect on throughput of profile cutting work unit.

Özet

Profil hazırlama, tersanedeki en önemli işlemlerden biridir. Profil işleme ünitesinde belirli boyutlara sahip profiller hazırlanmaktadır. Bu ünitede gecikme olduğunda, geminin teslim tarihi de gecikebilmektedir. Bu tip problemleri önlemek için profil işleme ünitesinin performansının yeterli olması gerekmektedir. Bu çalışmada bir tersanenin profil kesim ünitesi ele alınmış ve bu ünitenin performans analizi yapılmıştır. Çalışmanın ilk kısmında, profil işleme ünitesinin süreç analizi yapılmış ve simülasyon modeli oluşturulmuştur. Sonrasında, birtakım senaryolar uygulanarak çeşitli sonuçlar elde edilmiş ve değerlendirilmiştir. Bu senaryolar değerlendirildiğinde, markalama-kesim aktiviteleri üzerinde yapılabilecek olan iyileştirmelerin profil üretim miktarını artırdığı, diğer taraftan kenar temizleme ve taşlama işlemleri üzerinde yapılacak olan iyileştirmelerin profil kesim iş ünitesinin çıktı miktarını çok az etkilediği görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZKÖK, M. (2017). Gemi İnşaatında Simülasyon Ortamı Kullanarak Tekil Profil İmalatının İncelenmesi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 55, 79–91. https://ajindex.com/articles/222289

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Xu, J., Huang, E., Chen, C.H., Lee, L.H. 2015. Simulation Optimization: A Review and Exploration in the New Era of Cloud Computing and Big Data, Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 32, No. 3, p. 1-34
  2. Kelton, D., Smith, J.S., Sturrock, D.T. 2011.Simio and Simulation: Modeling, Analysis, Applications, Sewickley PA, E-book Ed., November 30, p.3
  3. Song, Y.J., Lee, D.K., Woo, J.H., Shin, J.G. 2010. System Development and Applications of a Shipyard Layout Design Framework, Journal of Ship Production and Design, Vol. 26, No. 2,, p. 144-154
  4. McLean, C., Shao, G. 2001. Simulation of Shipbuilding Operations, Proceedings of the 2001 Winter Simulation Conference, Arlington, USA, p. 870- 876
  5. Shin, J.G., Lee, K.K., Woo, J.H., Kim, W.D., Lee, J.H., Kim, S.H., Park, J.Y., Yim, H. A. 2004. Modeling and Simulation of Production Process in Subassembly Lines at a Shipyard, Journal of Ship Production, Vol. 20, No. 2, p. 79-83
  6. Kim, H., Lee, S.S., Park, J.H., Lee, J.G. A Model for a Simulation-Based Shipbuilding System in a Shipyard Manufacturing Process, International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 18, No. 6, p. 427-441
  7. Lee, K., Shin, J.G., Ryu, C. 2009. Development of Simulation-Based Production Execution System in a Shipyard: A Case Study for a Panel Block Assembly Shop, Production Planning & Control, Vol. 20, No. 8, p. 750-768
  8. Shin, J.G., Song, Y.J., Lee, D.K., Woo, J.H. 2009. A Concept and Framework for a Shipyard Layout Design Based on Simulation, Journal of Ship Production, Vol. 25, No. 3, p. 126-135
  9. Yasuhisa, O., Kentaro, H. 2005. Digital Manufacturing of Pipe Unit Assembly, Journal of Ship Production, Vol. 21, No. 3, p. 141- 145
  10. Cheng, T.M., Feng, C.W. 2003. An Effective Simulation Mechanism for Construction Operations, Automation in Construction, Vol. 12, p. 227-244
  11. Shin, J.G., Sohn, S.J. 2000. Simulation-Based Evaluation of Productivity For the Design of an Automated Fabrication Workshop in Shipbuilding, Journal of Ship Production, Vol. 16, No. 1, p. 46-59
  12. Cha, J.H., Roh, M.I. 2010. Combined Discrete Event and Discrete Time Simulation Framework and Its Application to the Block Erection Process in Shipbuilding, Advances in Engineering Software, Vol. 41, p. 656-665
  13. Woo, J.H., Song, Y.J., Kang, Y.W., Shin JG. 2010. Development of the Decision-Making System for the Ship Block Logistics Based on the Simulation, Journal of Ship Production and Design, Vol. 26, No. 4, p. 290-3